Is the conventional approach to core training for cycling, which focuses on exercises like planks and Russian twists, truly effective in improving efficient gear shifting, or is it just a byproduct of improved overall bike handling skills, and if so, should we be focusing on more functional, bike-specific exercises to target the specific muscles and movements involved in gear shifting.
Many professional cyclists and coaches swear by traditional core exercises as a key component of their training regimen, claiming that a strong core is essential for maintaining a stable position on the bike, generating power, and shifting gears smoothly. However, some have begun to question whether these exercises are truly addressing the specific demands of gear shifting, or if they are simply general exercises that happen to have some carryover benefits.
For example, research has shown that the primary muscles involved in gear shifting are the quadriceps, hamstrings, and hip flexors, which are responsible for controlling the movement of the pedals and the bikes position on the road. If this is the case, then shouldnt our core training programs be focused more on exercises that target these specific muscle groups, such as leg press, deadlifts, and step-ups, rather than traditional core exercises like planks and Russian twists.
Furthermore, some have suggested that the key to efficient gear shifting lies not in the strength or endurance of the muscles, but rather in the coordination and timing of the movement. If this is the case, then shouldnt we be focusing on more functional, bike-specific exercises that mimic the actual movement patterns involved in gear shifting, rather than traditional strength training exercises.
I would love to hear from other cyclists and coaches on this topic - do you think that traditional core exercises are still relevant for improving efficient gear shifting, or should we be taking a more functional, bike-specific approach to training.