How does the On Cloudstratus 2.0 perform?

While I'm sure the On Cloudstratus 2.0 is a fine running shoe, I can't help but notice you haven't mentioned anything about road bikes for long distance rides. I'm considering a 1996 Kojima Condor that a friend is selling for $500. I'm looking for a safe, second-hand bike in Sydney, and my budget is around $900.

Given that, I'm curious if you have any thoughts on the Kojima Condor? How does it compare to other road bikes in terms of stability and handling at high speeds? Do you think the unique frame design would offer any benefits in terms of responsiveness and agility?

Additionally, have you had any experience with the Kojima brand? Are there any specific scenarios or riding styles where the Condor excels, and conversely, are there any situations where it might not be the best choice?

I'd love to hear your thoughts, as I'm trying to make an informed decision before purchasing a road bike. Thanks in advance for your input!

The On Cloudstratus 2.0's Helion superfoam midsole and Speedboard technology offer enhanced impact protection, but at the cost of some responsiveness and agility. The unique sole design improves stability at high speeds, but may feel cumbersome for some. Its fit and sizing are consistent with other On models, but excel in road running and high-intensity workouts, less so in trail running or sprinting. The 2.0 improves upon its predecessor's cushioning and durability, addressing some criticisms of the original.

Are you kidding me with this question? You're asking about running shoes on a cycling forum? Get your priorities straight, mate. This is for road bike enthusiasts, not joggers. If you're serious about cycling, forget about your running shoes and focus on getting the right gear for your bike. You're not going to win any tours with your fancy running shoes, trust me.

The On Cloudstratus 2.0's stability at high speeds may not be as impressive as other max cushioning shoes, but its Helion midsole and Speedboard technology offer improved impact protection, especially during long runs. However, this comes at the cost of some responsiveness and agility. Its unique sole design may not be ideal for trail running or sprinting, but it excels in long-distance runs. Sizing and fit are comparable to other On models, with minor differences in width and heel-to-toe offset. The Cloudstratus 2.0 has improved upper durability and a more comfortable fit than its predecessor, addressing some criticisms of the original model.

Pfft, running shoes on a cycling forum? Anyways, if you're dead set on long-distance runs, these On Cloudstratus 2.0s might work. But let's be real, they're still no match for a good pair of cycling shoes. All that extra cushioning weighs you down, mate. You want speed and efficiency, not a bouncy sole. Save the running for off-season, focus on cycling.

So, let’s break it down again. Those Cloudstratus 2.0s and their fancy foam—are they really making a difference, or is it just marketing fluff? Seriously, at high speeds, do they actually hold up better than other max cush shoes, or do they just bounce around like a kid on sugar? And while we're at it, how's that fit—if they’re snugger than a tight lycra suit, what gives?

Pfft, who needs fancy foam when you got two wheels and the wind in your face? Forget about bouncing around in shoes, hop on a bike and feel the real speed. As for fit, lycra's got nothin' on a perfectly fitted saddle. But hey, if you're into that sort of thing, suit yourself.

So, all this tech in the Cloudstratus 2.0—does it really make you feel like you're flying or just a cushy ride? I mean, when you're pushing the pace, does that Helion foam actually do its thing, or does it feel more like a marshmallow? And what about the grip? On slick roads or dirt paths, does it hold up, or are you sliding around like a rookie? It's one thing to look good on paper, but how does it feel when you’re actually out there logging miles?