Whats the point of even discussing lactate threshold if its just a vague concept that doesnt actually translate to real-world performance gains, and why do coaches and riders still cling to it as a benchmark when zone 1 is the only metric that actually matters for building a strong aerobic base and increasing endurance.
Isnt it time to acknowledge that lactate threshold is nothing more than a myth perpetuated by the cycling industry to sell training plans and gadgets, and that the only thing that actually matters is the ability to sustain a high pace over a long period of time, which is directly correlated to zone 1 fitness.
Why do so many riders waste their time doing high-intensity interval training to try and boost their lactate threshold, when the overwhelming evidence suggests that this type of training is not only ineffective, but also leads to injury and burnout.
Whats the logic behind using lactate threshold as a benchmark for fitness when its so highly variable and dependent on a multitude of factors, including diet, sleep, and stress levels, and why do coaches and riders not focus more on the one metric that is actually consistent and reliable, which is zone 1.
Isnt it time to throw out the outdated and discredited concept of lactate threshold and focus on what actually works, which is building a strong aerobic base through zone 1 training, and why do so many riders and coaches still cling to this myth.