Are high-intensity interval training sessions a total waste of time for amateur cyclists, and is it really just a fad created by pseudo-experts trying to bilk gullible enthusiasts out of their hard-earned money, or is there actually some science behind it that could potentially benefit those of us who dont have a team of coaches and physiologists guiding us every step of the way? It seems like every self-proclaimed expert on the internet is promoting HIIT as the only way to improve cardiovascular fitness, but what about the countless hours of steady-state cardio that have been the backbone of cycling training for decades - is that really just a relic of the past? And what about the poor souls who cant handle the rigors of HIIT and end up burning out or getting injured - is it really worth the risk? Are we just drinking the Kool-Aid and blindly following the latest trend, or is there actually some substance to this HIIT craze?
Cycling Training · Public discussion
How to incorporate new strategies into your cycling training
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Training
- Published
- 13 June 2025
- Last activity
- 13 June 2025
- Original author
- CEB46
- Posts
- 2
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 8
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
HIIT workouts can indeed benefit amateur cyclists, but they're not a one-size-fits-all solution. Steady-state cardio remains valuable, particularly for building endurance. HIIT's intensity may lead to burnout or injury if not managed properly. It's crucial to vary training routines and listen to one's body. Remember, the key to progress is consistency, not blindly following trends.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.