Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Inserting links in a chain that came with "gold link"?

Started by x · · Last activity · 4 posts · 744 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 January 2004
Last activity
19 January 2004
Original author
x
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
744
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A few weeks ago, I just made my second audition for the 2003 Darwin awards by breaking a chain as I
    stomped uphill on an SS.

    Thinking back, I believe I had played around with that chain a little - taking links out, then
    putting them back in as I tried different chainwheel sizes.

    I heard somebody in another thread opine that the newer, smaller chains are not all that tolerant of
    chain tools.

    Could that have been the root cause? If so, would you trash a chain and buy a new one rather than
    add links back in?
    --
    PeteCresswell

  2. most modern chains have the rivet [wholly or partially] "mushroomed" after assembly. removal of one
    of these rivets either enlarges the link plate rivet hole or breaks off the mushroomed bit on the
    rivet as the chain tool forces it out. consequently, reinsertion is most inadvisable.

    if you must add back a length of chain, use another connector link for sram-type chain or a new
    rivet pin for shimano.

    new chain is even better.

    jb

    (Pete Cresswell) said:

    A few weeks ago, I just made my second audition for the 2003 Darwin awards by breaking a chain as
    I stomped uphill on an SS.

    Thinking back, I believe I had played around with that chain a little - taking links out, then
    putting them back in as I tried different chainwheel sizes.

    I heard somebody in another thread opine that the newer, smaller chains are not all that tolerant
    of chain tools.

    Could that have been the root cause? If so, would you trash a chain and buy a new one rather than
    add links back in?

  3. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    A few weeks ago, I just made my second audition for the 2003 Darwin awards by breaking a chain as
    I stomped uphill on an SS. Thinking back, I believe I had played around with that chain a little -
    taking links out, then putting them back in as I tried different chainwheel sizes. I heard
    somebody in another thread opine that the newer, smaller chains are not all that tolerant of chain
    tools. Could that have been the root cause? If so, would you trash a chain and buy a new one
    rather than add links back in?

    Modern chain is very sensitive to rivets pressed not quite properly, as you discovered.

    If you _must_ add or rejoin links,(something we avoid ) carefully feel the rivet height with your
    fingers so the replaced rivet is identical to the adjacent ones. Fingers are much more accurate than
    eyes for very small distances.

    Next time, size your chain, cut it once and then use the snaplink.

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  4. On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:57:20 -0600, A Muzi <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Next time, size your chain, cut it once and then use the snaplink.

    I agree. I keep a worn chain and links for it around for sizing. I like the chains to be minium
    lenght to wrap big/big. I size using the 'sizing' chain. When that works, I cut once on new chain
    and always use a removable link.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.