I need info on the specs and changes in the subject model years. Drive train, components, frame
geometry, frame composition, wheels, etc. I am particularly interested in the differences in the
model years. Trek was unable (or unwilling) to provide this info for 1999-2002 years. I appreciate
all input. Thanks a bunch.
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Trek 2300 Years 1999 - 2003
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 5 March 2004
- Last activity
- 18 April 2004
- Original author
- Tekbuf
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 3,919
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
(TekBuf) said:
I need info on the specs and changes in the subject model years.
Ask your LBS if they have Bike-a-Log. This would make your task quite easy.
Barry
-
I bought a 1998 TREK 2300 in year 2000. I considered buying a 2000 model when I got my 1998. Let's see, the TREK 2300 has always been a 100% ultegra bicycle with an ICON carbon fork in 1998, and TREK carbon fork in later years. In 1999-2002, it was alpha aluminum, in 2003, it became 100% ZR9000 Aluminum, substantially lighter.
In 1999, I believe it had the same generic wheels as my 2300, e.g. Shimano Ultegra hubs with Mavic CXP22 rims. Starting in 2000, it had bontrager low-spoke exotic wheels. Stem is ICON. Headset on mine was a Tange. Otherwise, the Ultegra gruppo was complete. Seat was TREK / Selle San Marco or Bontrager (Trek house brand atop probably selle san marco). Handlebars are ICON. That covers about 90% of the components. The bike didn't change much from 2000-2002. The alpha aluminum frameset, with its triangular downtube, sure was ugly, though.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.