Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

DIY rear derailleur / Chain length Help

Started by Arrowz · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,577 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
7 March 2003
Last activity
8 March 2003
Original author
Arrowz
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,577
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. in all my brilliance I decided to buy a 9 speed shimano cassette, mtb, I think it is an XT. Then I
    bought a long cage sram 9.0sl with the matching shifter. The whole idea was to be able to run the
    long cage "downhill" type derailleur so help with the chain slap, I'm tall, so that crankset is
    waaaayyy out there.

    Now of course, the derailleur didn't come with any hint as to the range of motion. So I checked my
    mountain bike and winged it. What I ended up doing was putting the chain on granny gear in the front
    and the 9th sprocket in back (theoretically shortest chain need). At this point, I set the chain
    length so that the derailleur idler gears are straight up and down.

    The problem is, even in the middle gear in the front, the derailleur is maxed/straight horizontal in
    3rd. If I downshift to 2nd, it overlaps the cassette and everything gets stuck. Now it seems like
    the obvious solution is to make the chain longer, since I'll probably never use the granny gear over
    4th or so anyway, it seems pretty silly that I did that.

    Now, before I go chain breaking and trial-and-erroring, do you guys have a rule of thumb you use for
    this sort of thing? Should I instead measure from the top end, i.e. biggest chainring, highest
    sprocket? Which way would the derailleur idler gears point at the longest possible chain need?

    I'm pretty good at remembering not to shift below 3, but still, I want it to work!

    alan

  2. arrowz <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    Should I instead measure from the top end, i.e. biggest chainring, highest sprocket? Which way
    would the derailleur idler gears point at the longest possible chain need?

    largest sprocket to largest chainring. The derailleur arm should be less than parallel with the
    ground. The more the better, provided that when you shift two the smallest diameter gears (front and
    back) there is some chain tensioning done by the derailleur.

    or look at sheldonbrown.comderailer adj.html

    Quoted message said:


    I'm pretty good at remembering not to shift below 3, but still, I want it to work!

    alan

  3. Alan;

    There should be no reason you can't use every possible combination of chainring/cog on a bent,
    provided you're not "cheating" by using chainrings that exceed the max. capacity of the derailleur
    (I have my Wishbone set up this way).

    ANYTHING that doesn't cause the derailleur cage to collapse completely
    (i.e. allow the chain to actually rub against itself) when in the granny ring/small cog will work.

    Yes, you need to add some links.

    To further explain "cheating:" You can come up with chainring/cassette combinations that result in
    unusable gears, but the flip side is that you get a wider gear range. On my Wishbone the crankset is
    (IIRC) 56-36-26, or something like that. The granny might be 28. The cassette is 11-30. I have a
    gear range of (IIRC) 24 - 125 gear inches.

    BUT I can only use the two largest cogs when in the granny. If I try to upshift the rear, the rear
    derailleur wraps up fully. So I have to first upshift the front.

    Hope this makes sense....

    Andy D.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.