rec.sport.unicycling archive · Public discussion

hopping consistancy

Started by Muniracer · · Last activity · 2 posts · 474 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling archive
Published
2 April 2004
Last activity
2 April 2004
Original author
Muniracer
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
474
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. this is mainly for ryan, kris, benps, joey, jeff, and all
    you big jumpers out there...

    what kind of consistancy do you guys get on your high hops?
    and how does lowering the height affect this?

    For example,

    I can hop 73-74cm maybe 7% or 8% 69cm maybe 33% 66cm maybe
    66% 63cm and under almost 100%

    also, how precise? meaning on how small a landing platform
    can you jump onto and stay on most of the time?

    me: 73cm about a 50cm wide platform 69cm about a 40cm wide
    platform 66cm about a 35 cm wide platform 63cm and under
    about a 25-30cm wide platform

    thanks

    --
    muniracer - Hell On Wheel

    The Hell on Wheel Unicycle Gang owns you!!

    unicyclist.comalbuq25
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    muniracer's Profile: unicyclist.com4339
    View this thread: unicyclist.com31276

  2. I'm no Ben Plotkin-Swing, but: I find I'm 75-100% consistent
    on all hops at 64 cm, depending on the day and space for
    prehop (sans the prehop and that consistency drops to about
    50-60%). Past that, it depends on location. I have all hops
    up to 62 cm consistent in the 90% ranges. I find that when
    going above 64 cm, I have a bad consistency of about 5-15%.

    As for takeoff and landing area, that depends. On hops up to
    60cm, I find that I really don't need more than a 4x6
    landing area in observation, but mentally I find I need at
    least a 6x8 landing surface. As for takeoff, the takeoff
    point can be as skinny for me a 3", but it has to be at
    least 6" long on the axis parallel to the obstacle, because
    of my forward-backward inaccuracy in my setups. Once I get
    to about 64cm, I find I need about a 9x9" takeoff on a good
    day, and a 12x14" landing, just for my mental security, even
    if I only use about an 8x9" area.

    On jumps off extremely skinny stuff, my accuracy and
    consistency are bad. I max out at about 14" (25% consistency
    at best) on a good day when going off the thin edge of a
    2x4, partially because of my lateral inaccuracies causing me
    to not know where the preloaded tire is going to send me,
    along with the fact that I've been running a very low tire
    pressure lately (18psi on a 19x2.5). When doing a hop I can
    raise my consistency slightly by angling my tire relative to
    the 2x4 a bit, but evern then I need a large landing area
    and my consistency still doesn't break 30% on hops over 12".
    I need to work on it.

    As for gaps, I find I can gap 1m to a 2x4 and immediately go
    another 1m to a 12x18" object with a high consistency, but
    when I fall, I fall hard. I find my lack of front-back
    accuracy hurts me when I try to gap over 3' to an 8x18"
    object, which is what I practice on.

    As for crankgrabs, my stats are awful. I can't pedalgrab to
    rubber, and I'm very shakey on crankgrabs. I find I need at
    least a 12x12 area to go to rubber on a crank grab, although
    I can pedalgrab a 30" object with as little as a 6x6 top on
    it. But then, I immediately go back down. Not to jack a
    thread, but does anyone have any miracle advice for
    pedalgrabs? I can't do them. If you wish to know, i hop with
    the exact same orientation as Kris (I think). I prefer to
    jump to the left, I have my right foot back, and I hold with
    my right hand.

    Hope this helps with whatever purpose you had in mind...

    P.S. I my opinion, accuracy is much more important than
    height. I'd much rather be able to jump 22" 100% of the
    time onto a 3x3" surface, than be able to do 30" 75% of
    the time onto a 2'x2' surface, mainly because most
    trials lines are hard because of accuracy, not size of
    the moves.

    --
    gerblefranklin - Trials Unicyclist

    Don't you think it's a cruel irony that acting like a G.I. Joe in the
    army can get you a Medal, while playing with one can get you thrown out?
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gerblefranklin's Profile: unicyclist.com4295
    View this thread: unicyclist.com31276

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.