Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Seatposts: Usable Lengths?

Started by Petecresswell · · Last activity · 29 posts · 1,356 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 April 2004
Last activity
7 May 2004
Original author
Petecresswell
Posts
29
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,356
Views / 30 days
4

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–29 of 29
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    Sounds to me like I should re-spec the frame to have a
    22" seat tube


    instead of

    Quoted message said:

    21.

    Heck, why not longer? With the seatpost lengths you mention,
    I can't imagine you'll have any difficulty with standover
    clearance.

    --
    Dave dvt at psu dot edu

  2. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Wow, I guess that will require a pile of spacers between
    the headset and the stem. That is if your steering tube is
    300mm long like the new ones I've seen. Not a problem if
    it's steel and you are OK with the look. Are you talking
    about a suspension fork? They kick the front end up so you
    could reduce the number of spacers on top. Anyhow, the
    setup sounds a bit contrived. Either I'm missing something
    or you are getting the frame for the right price. No
    matter. I wish you good luck and I sincerely hope you enjoy
    your bike.

    The steering tube will be 6.4" which, on my hardtail, allows
    mountint a stem at the very top of an uncut fork with a max
    spacer stack of 1.25".

    "Contrived" in that I've got right-bell-curve dimensions:
    37.5" inseam, size 15 feet...and so-forth.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  3. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    I can understand 3 ft long seatposts and vertical stems on
    an off the shelf frame, but custom?

    There's an upper limit on steering tubes.

    As far as the seatpost goes, seems to me like it's one of
    those "you pays your money and you takes your choice"
    things. More seatpost/lower standover....less
    seatpost/greater standover.

    My current bike is an Ellsworth ISIS with one of those "Y"
    frames....max standover...and it's saved my butt a couple of
    times, so I'm prejudiced in favor of minimum
    standover....but I just don't want to get into a situation
    where I need some kind of designer seatpost fo achieve it.
    If Thompson's 410 will do the job, I'll be happy with
    that...and it sounds like that's the case.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  4. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    RE/

    Quoted message said:

    I can understand 3 ft long seatposts and vertical stems on
    an off the shelf frame, but custom?

    There's an upper limit on steering tubes.

    In your previous post you mention 1.25" of spacers. Why not
    1.25" more of headtube instead of spacers? It doesn't sound
    like you're interested in lowering your bars, and even if
    you wanted to couldn't you get a flatter stem?

    Quoted message said:

    As far as the seatpost goes, seems to me like it's one of
    those "you pays your money and you takes your choice"
    things. More seatpost/lower standover....less
    seatpost/greater standover

    My current bike is an Ellsworth ISIS with one of those "Y"
    frames....max standover...and it's saved my butt a couple
    of times, so I'm prejudiced in favor of minimum
    standover....

    Either you're a lot more hardcore than you let on in a.m-b
    or I think you're favoring standover clearance too much.

    Greg

  5. Quoted message said:

    Either you're a lot more hardcore than you let on in a.m-b
    or I think you're favoring standover clearance too much.

    There's a third option: really, really clumsy....

    Also, the shorter the seat tube, the more chance I can lend
    the bike to a normal person...-)

  6. "PeteCresswell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Either you're a lot more hardcore than you let on in
    a.m-b or I think you're favoring standover clearance
    too much.

    There's a third option: really, really clumsy....

    Also, the shorter the seat tube, the more chance I can
    lend the bike to a normal person...-)

    Well, there is a lot to say for that!

    Greg

  7. "PeteCresswell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I need 32" from the seatpost's clip to the center of the
    BB spindle.

    A frame I'm thinking about is only 21".

    Anybody know what length post I'd need to get a full 12"
    (an extra inch just for margin of error...) of actual,
    usable extension from the top of the seat tube to the clip
    where the saddle rails lie?

    Seems like post specs are something like LOA...but
    not quite.

    My saddle-to-BB dimension is right about the same as yours
    and I've been using a RaceFace XY 400 mm seatpost on a 21"
    Schwinn Homegrown Full Suspension frame for several years
    now with no problems. (My weight has been as high as 260lbs
    in that time period too.) This frame uses a pretty small
    26.8mm dia. post and up until I got the RF XY, I bent every
    other post I tried (original, Kalloy, Ritchey Comp, Titec
    XC) within six months. I've got plenty of seatpost down
    inside the frame. The XY posts also have a pretty large 1"
    offset and one of the easiest saddle angle/horizontal
    adjustments I've used.

    I would have used a Thomson post on the above bike but I
    needed as much offset as I could get and their setback post
    was only available in a 250mm for a 26.8" dia. I can say
    that the only seatpost a friend of mine, who's about 6' 6"
    and 245 lbs, did not bend on the 19" aluminum hardtail he
    was riding for a few years was a straight Thomson 410mm post
    (it's a 26.8" too.) I finally convinced him he needed a
    larger frame when I came across a new Specialized 23"
    aluminum hardtail frame and built it up for him to try. We
    used a Titec Knock post on that bike - it seems pretty
    strong and is available in a 390 mm length.

  8. [email hidden] (PeteCresswell) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [...] Anybody know what length post I'd need to get a full
    12" (an extra inch just for margin of error...) of actual,
    usable extension from the top of the seat tube to the clip
    where the saddle rails lie?

    Seems like post specs are something like LOA...but
    not quite.

    So in conclusion, a seatpost should be inserted at least 4
    inches and completely past the top tube welds? Yes? No? Same
    rules for a 150lb rider as a 250? Same rules for off-road as
    on-road? Thanks.

  9. galt-<< So in conclusion, a seatpost should be inserted at
    least 4 inches and completely past the top tube welds? Yes?
    No? >><BR><BR>

    Minimum-twice the top tube width below the bottom of
    the top tube.

    So a 1.5cm top tube, 3cm below the bottom of the top tube.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.