UK and Europe · Public discussion

The Protective Tablets for Senior Citizens Bill

Started by Eric Martlew · · Last activity · 5 posts · 571 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
28 April 2004
Last activity
29 April 2004
Original author
Eric Martlew
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
571
Views / 30 days
5

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Every day in Britain tens of thousands die needlessly for
    want of a simple medical treatment: aspirin. The benefits of
    aspirin are well known: in a study funded by the independent
    Bayer Dogystatistichesinstitut, and reported in the New
    England Journal of Medicine, it was found that a daily dose
    of aspirin reduced incidence of heart attacks by 85%.
    Scurrilous rumours have been circulated that this was
    arrived at by comparing a case group of geriatric smokers
    with a control group made up of twenty-year-olds, but
    nothing could be further from the truth. The controls were
    aged 21-25.

    Accordingly, I will be bringing a Bill before Parliament to
    make it an offence to cause or permit any person over the
    age of 40 to fail to take at least one aspirin per day.

    I know that the benefits can be realised because the Aspirin
    Promotion Initiative Trust (APIT) have conducted extensive
    trials in Reading, funded by the Department of Health, and
    assure me that there have been "significant" reductions in
    heart attacks. The study finished three years ago and has
    been extended to a number of other areas, so some actual
    figures should be available any day now. TV vet Arma
    Celebritygetmeouttahere says: "I support this Bill entirely.
    Aspirin is a vital ingredient in health; I am so confident
    that the policy is right that I am marketing my own range of
    aspirin with added oxygen. All dead people are found to have
    a lack of oxygen in the brain, so this additional safety
    feature will further enhance the massive protective effect
    of the aspirin itself."

    Anti-aspirin campaigners have said that this will be
    unenforceable because it will be impossible to decide who is
    responsible for an individual forty-year-old. This is errant
    nonsense. In the case of parents, it is the children's job.
    For other people it might be their doctor, geriatric nurse,
    prison warder, pharmacist, bus driver or the woman they met
    at a party last week. The Police, having nothing better to
    do, will track down and prosecute for attempted murder any
    person who fails to ensure people get their aspirin
    (needless to say they will only do so when appropriate). Or
    it may not be necessary to enforce it at all: I have a
    letter here from a Mrs Kray stating that if only there had
    been an aspirin law, she would have been able to force her
    sons Ronnie and Reggie to take their aspirin. As it was they
    merely broke the pharmacist's legs. Both have now died of
    heart attacks.

    This is an idea whose time has come. Western Australia led
    the way, with their law being passed in 1994. New Zealand
    followed in 1996, some US states and Canada have followed
    suit. Although these laws have not resulted in reductions in
    heart attacks, we are confident that it is simply because
    people are taking the aspirin wrongly.

    100% of people who die suffer from an arrested heart, and
    aspirin, correctly taken, prevents 85% of heart attacks, so
    this Bill will save over half a million lives every year.
    The Department of Health has opposed this Bill - but they
    would, woudln't they? After all, if people stop dying,
    they'll be out of a job!

    I know you will support this Bill. Otherwise you are a
    granny murdering [censored] in tweed.

    Eric Martlew, MP

  2. In "]news:[email hidden],
    Eric Martlew <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    Scurrilous rumours have been circulated that this was
    arrived at by comparing a case group of geriatric smokers
    with a control group made up of twenty-year-olds, but
    nothing could be further from the truth. The controls were
    aged 21-25.

    Accordingly, I will be bringing a Bill before
    Parliament to make it an offence to cause or permit any
    person over the age of 40 to fail to take at least one
    aspirin per day.

    Quite right, I'm 26 and I've been taking 3 grams of aspirin
    (derivatives) a day for three years, and I've never ever had
    a heart attack, so everyone should take it.

    Hear, hear, at last someone's talking some common sense,

    Good luck with this most astute bill, Eric

    Ambrose

  3. Eric Martlew said:

    Every day in Britain tens of thousands die needlessly for
    want of a simple medical treatment: aspirin. The benefits
    of aspirin are well known: in a study funded by the
    independent Bayer Dogystatistichesinstitut, and reported
    in the New England Journal of Medicine, it was found that
    a daily dose of aspirin reduced incidence of heart attacks
    by 85%. Scurrilous rumours have been circulated that this
    was arrived at by comparing a case group of geriatric
    smokers with a control group made up of twenty-year-olds,
    but nothing could be further from the truth. The controls
    were aged 21-25.

    Accordingly, I will be bringing a Bill before
    Parliament to make it an offence to cause or permit any
    person over the age of 40 to fail to take at least one
    aspirin per day.

    Yet another mis-inspired Bill Mr Martlew. Research in
    Australia and New Zealand following the introduction of MAL
    has shown absolutely no change in the rate of heart attacks
    in that age group Researchers believe that since the
    introduction of the MAL, over forties have believed
    themselves to be immune from heart disease and so ceased to
    take exercise and adversely changed their diet counteracting
    any benefit from the MAL. There has also been a dramatic
    rise in gastric disorders as a consequence of long term
    aspirin consumption although cardiologists deny this.

    Dr O Beasoz

  4. [email hidden] (Eric Martlew) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I know you will support this Bill. Otherwise you are a
    granny murdering [censored] in tweed.

    Well done, Eric. Nice to see you making sense for a change.

    --
    Dave...

  5. "Eric Martlew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Re. the benefits of aspirin:

    Quoted message said:

    Accordingly, I will be bringing a Bill before
    Parliament to make it an offence to cause or permit any
    person over the age of 40 to fail to take at least one
    aspirin per day.

    Whilst a good idea I think it will be too difficult to
    police. Wouldn't it be far simpler to add aspirin to tap
    water following the precedent by fluoridation?
    --
    Regards, Pete

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.