Simon Mason said:
"Pyromancer" <[email hidden]> wrote
in messageQuoted message said:
Arrghh - yes, that drives me up the wall! Whenever I know
I'll be stopped for more than a minute or so I switch the
engine off (and if the jam is on a slope, leave it off
and roll slowly down using the footbrake), but everyone
else just seems to sit there, idling away, engines
turning over at 900-ish RPM, burning fuel to no purpose
and pumping out huge quantities of exhaust.I do the same, but you have to be careful with modern
brakes that are servo assisted since once the engine is
off, you need a lot more foot pressure to keep the car
still. Also, if you leave your ignition on you will dazzle
rear traffic with the high intensity brake lights.In The Netherlands there is a sign before bridges and
railway lines that says "bridge up?, motor off!". It
might even be an offence there to idle your engine to
excess IIRC.
I think it is in the UK as well:
From the CCN:
Legislation introduced on 2nd February 1998 made it an
offence to cause unnecessary emissions by leaving a
vehicle's engine running unnecessarily whilst stationary.
This extended an existing offence of causing unnecessary
noise by the same means. Enforcement is predominantly by the
police and the offence carries a maximum fine on conviction
of £1,000. In addition, regulations in December 1997 enabled
seven local authorities – Birmingham, Bristol, Canterbury,
Glasgow, Middlesbrough, Swansea and Westminster – to issue
fixed penalty notices in relation to any vehicle with an
engine running unnecessarily whilst stationary. The fixed
penalty is £20. It is proposed that these powers by extended
more widely in England and Wales.
Apparently Scotland's ahead of the game:
edinburghnews.scotsman.comindex.cfmOpen ↗
Never heard of anyone getting done, though.