FAO: DRCEE PHD

Quoted message said:

Subject: FAO: DRCEE PHD
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 5/20/04 4:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

news.bbc.co.uk3729487.stmOpen ↗ You might
find this intereting. Anth

Thanks for thinking of me.

The earliest references that I have is to Bechamp's research
and scientifically published articles. Somehow he was able
to see the minute critters. He viewed them living and not
dead as most microscopists would have tried. Pasteur refused
to allow his workers to be trained and shown what Bechamp
was seeing. What his illumination source was, what his
magnification was, and how he accomplished it is amazing.
Bechamp was not only able to see them but he was able to
culture them and analyze them by their protien ( albumen )
coating. It seems that every organ and tissue had different
"microzymas" in their makeup.

Notice that once again, modern scientists have not
reproduced what Bechamp was able to do in 1870. They still
try to view the universe in a dead state rather than a
living state with their electron microscopes.

Keep in mind that Bechamp was able to culture living forms
from chalk that was over 200 million years old. Yep, we are
immortal in some ways because our microzymas continue to
live on after we die.

DrC PhD

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: FAO: DRCEE PHD From: "Anth"
[email hidden] Date: 5/20/04 4:44 AM
Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: <8vmdnTftCKR48jHdRVn-
[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

news.bbc.co.uk3729487.stmOpen ↗ You might
find this intereting. Anth

Thanks for thinking of me.

The earliest references that I have is to Bechamp's
research and

scientifically

Quoted message said:

published articles. Somehow he was able to see the minute
critters. He viewed them living and

not

Quoted message said:

dead as most microscopists would have tried. Pasteur
refused to allow his workers to be trained and shown what
Bechamp was seeing. What his illumination source was, what
his magnification was, and how he accomplished it is
amazing. Bechamp was not only able to see them but he

was

Quoted message said:

able to culture them and analyze them by their protien (
albumen )

coating. It

Quoted message said:

seems that every organ and tissue had different
"microzymas" in their

makeup.

I was thinking of actuallty getting myself a decent
darkfield and seeing if I could see these things under it.
Of course they are expensive so I will have to do a bit of
saving up. Note that Rife quotes that the organisms are seen
as dried up blobs under an electron, which is what you see
here. If you want to give me a hand with this and what
Bechamp did then that would be nice.

Quoted message said:

Notice that once again, modern scientists have not
reproduced what Bechamp

was

Quoted message said:

able to do in 1870. They still try to view the universe in
a dead state

rather

Quoted message said:

than a living state with their electron microscopes.

Would be nice to see if these organisms do actually mover
about i.e. are 'life'

Quoted message said:

Keep in mind that Bechamp was able to culture living forms
from chalk that

was

Quoted message said:

over 200 million years old. Yep, we are immortal in
some ways because our microzymas continue to live on
after we die.

Quoted message said:

DrC PhD

Anth

In article <[email hidden]>,

Anth said:

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040520205852.29731.00001758@mb-
m05.aol.com...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: FAO: DRCEE PHD From: "Anth"
[email hidden] Date: 5/20/04 4:44 AM
Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: <8vmdnTftCKR48jHdRVn-
[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

news.bbc.co.uk3729487.stmOpen ↗ You
might find this intereting. Anth

Thanks for thinking of me.

The earliest references that I have is to Bechamp's
research and

scientifically

Quoted message said:

published articles. Somehow he was able to see the minute
critters. He viewed them living and

not

Quoted message said:

dead as most microscopists would have tried. Pasteur
refused to allow his workers to be trained and shown what
Bechamp was seeing. What his illumination source was,
what his magnification was, and how he accomplished it is
amazing. Bechamp was not only able to see them but he

was

Quoted message said:

able to culture them and analyze them by their protien (
albumen )

coating. It

Quoted message said:

seems that every organ and tissue had different
"microzymas" in their

makeup.

I was thinking of actuallty getting myself a decent
darkfield and seeing if I could see these things under it.

Why not contact a local university and see if you can't get
access to one of their microscopes? If your ideas were at
all intriguing to them, I bet you could work out something,
and quite possibly with better equipment than you could
afford to buy yourself.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

I'm not sure how I would go about doing something like this?
Would I have to pay them money to do this or even would they
let a lay man have access to their labs? It would be a good
idea though. Anth

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Anth

Quoted message said:

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040520205852.29731.00001758@mb-
m05.aol.com...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: FAO: DRCEE PHD From: "Anth"
>[email hidden] Date: 5/20/04 4:44 AM
>Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: <8vmdnTftCKR48jHdRVn-
>[email hidden]>

>news.bbc.co.uk3729487.stmOpen ↗ You
>might find this intereting. Anth

Thanks for thinking of me.

The earliest references that I have is to Bechamp's
research and

scientifically

Quoted message said:

published articles. Somehow he was able to see the
minute critters. He viewed them living

and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

not

Quoted message said:

dead as most microscopists would have tried. Pasteur
refused to allow

his

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

workers to be trained and shown what Bechamp was
seeing. What his illumination source was, what his
magnification was, and how

he

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

accomplished it is amazing. Bechamp was not only able
to see them but

he

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

was

Quoted message said:

able to culture them and analyze them by their protien
( albumen )

coating. It

Quoted message said:

seems that every organ and tissue had different
"microzymas" in their

makeup.

I was thinking of actuallty getting myself a decent
darkfield and seeing

if

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I could see these things under it.

Why not contact a local university and see if you can't
get access to one of their microscopes? If your ideas were
at all intriguing to them, I bet you could work out
something, and quite possibly with better equipment than
you could afford to buy yourself.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

In article <[email hidden]>,

Anth said:

I'm not sure how I would go about doing something like
this? Would I have to pay them money to do this or even
would they let a lay man have access to their labs? It
would be a good idea though.

I don't know what it'd cost either, but it wouldn't hurt to
ask. If they were interested, it might not cost anything.

You'd want to be nice and clear about what you were hoping
to accomplish and how, so as to make the best possible first
impression.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Quoted message said:

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Anth

Quoted message said:

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040520205852.29731.00001758@mb-
m05.aol.com...
> >Subject: FAO: DRCEE PHD From: "Anth"
> >[email hidden] Date: 5/20/04 4:44 AM
> >Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: <8vmdnTftCKR48jHdRVn-
> >[email hidden]>
>
> >news.bbc.co.uk3729487.stmOpen ↗ You
> >might find this intereting. Anth
>
> Thanks for thinking of me.
>
> The earliest references that I have is to Bechamp's
> research and
scientifically
> published articles. Somehow he was able to see the
> minute critters. He viewed them living

and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

not
> dead as most microscopists would have tried. Pasteur
> refused to allow

his

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> workers to be trained and shown what Bechamp was
> seeing. What his illumination source was, what his
> magnification was, and how

he

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> accomplished it is amazing. Bechamp was not only able
> to see them but

he

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

was
> able to culture them and analyze them by their protien
> ( albumen )
coating. It
> seems that every organ and tissue had different
> "microzymas" in their
makeup.

I was thinking of actuallty getting myself a decent
darkfield and seeing

if

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I could see these things under it.

Why not contact a local university and see if you can't
get access to one of their microscopes? If your ideas
were at all intriguing to them, I bet you could work out
something, and quite possibly with better equipment than
you could afford to buy yourself.

[email hidden] (DRCEEPHD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

My original thought for my life was to develop medicines
that would benefit millions of humans rather than to be a
doctor who could only benefit mere thousands.

I now realize that this thought is as false as modern
medicine's cures.

<snip for brevity only>

Quoted message said:

Unfortunately, I am in the same boat. Great desires, real
zeal, but few bucks.

Don't those "mere thousands" of humans who reap the benefits
of what you do appreciate it enough to pay you? [Although I
don't recall you posting what it is you actually do --
perhaps I missed it?] Even if you work for an organization
of some sort & those many people you help don't pay *you*
directly -- surely your employer values your work enough to
either compensate you handsomely or provide you with the
equipment & supplies you'd need for such important work?

Skilled, dependable, responsible nurses, OTOH, are often
not valued by their employers -- they often pay us more
than they want to only because they know it's more
expensive not to.