Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

long-cage trade-off's?

Started by Dw · · Last activity · 8 posts · 621 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 June 2004
Last activity
11 June 2004
Original author
Dw
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
621
Views / 30 days
2

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by going
    to a long cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog?

  2. "dw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance
    by going to a long cage rear DR to accommodate a big
    rear cog?

    Little if any, in my experience. My needs are such that on
    my road bikes I will often run an XT (long-cage MTB) rear
    derailleur and cassette to be able to climb the mountains
    that surround us. So, I have bikes with Dura Ace short cage,
    Ultegra long cage and XT MTB long cage derailleurs. While
    there might be some mild 'performance' differences, at worst
    they are minor and affect nothing.

  3. (dw) may have said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance by
    going to a long cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear cog?

    If you go from a high-end short-cage to a cheap long-cage,
    of course.

    The question is too broad as posed. You might get a better
    answer if you added info detailing from which short-cage to
    which long-cage you intended to swap.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via
    e-mail. Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature. Words
    processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  4. dw said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance
    by going to a long cage rear DR to accommodate a big
    rear cog?

    I don't think it makes a dime's worth of difference,
    especially these days with Hyperglide-type cogs. The shift
    takes place as the cog gates come around, and is not
    derailer dependent.

    Matt O.

  5. Werehatrack said:

    On 7 Jun 2004 08:07:38 -0700, [email hidden] (dw) may
    have said:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance
    by going to a long cage rear DR to accommodate a big
    rear cog?


    I believe that campy long-cage derailleurs may have
    different slant angles from the medium and short-cage
    derailleurs. The pulley cage is said to be incompatible in
    the small parts catalogs. I saw a Chorus derailleur from the
    early 1990's where you could actually adjust the
    parallelogram slant. With early suntour derailleurs you
    could also do this.

    I would imagine that with a long-cage derailleur on a
    corncob sprocket, you may have to do some "overshift",
    especially if the chain is stretched and flexible, in order
    to complete the shift. This is pure imagination and i
    haven't verified it in practice.

    I think the main advantage of a short-cage derailleur is
    weight savings, not only in the derailleur itself, but also
    in the chain. Also, perhaps your chain life is extended
    (especially with indexed gears) because you may be able to
    still index-shift with a flexible chain and a short-cage
    derailleur. Is it good to be able to use a worn chain
    longer? Maybe not.

    Anyway, i don't buy short cage derailleurs any more. the
    advantages just aren't worth the costs of a knee surgery.

    - Don Gillies San Diego, CA

  6. dvwlt-<< On a road bike, do you give up shifting performance
    by going to a long cage rear DR to accommodate a big rear
    cog? >><BR><BR>

    Nope-

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  7. Not really. It's the top pulley that does the shifting, and
    it's the same distance from the cog teeth and derailer body
    regardless of how far the other one. The only thing the
    lower pulley does is take up the slack on the chain.

    Using an inadequate derailer for your gearing will result in
    much worse shifting, trust me. There are times when I have
    had no other choice.

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear
    for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner geocities.comczcorner

  8. Chris-<< Not really. It's the top pulley that does the
    shifting, and it's the same distance from the cog teeth and
    derailer body regardless of how far the other one. The only
    thing the lower pulley does is take up the slack on the
    chain. >><BR><BR>

    Well said!!

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.