Cancer can be cured by natural means...

"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Cellular Medicine in Cancer

Cellular Medicine provides a new perspective in the
developmental steps of cancer and its metastasis and new
safe, effective therapeutic options.

Let's look at the lies that have to be used to make Dr
Rath's concoctions look good..

Quoted message said:

Choices and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: For decades,
standard treatment for cancer has consisted of surgery,
radiation and chemotherapy. Radiation and chemotherapy,
the most

frequently

Quoted message said:

used therapies,

Surgery is far and away the most frequently used medical
treatment, but it suits the quacks to refer to
treatments that are only used in more life-threatening
or difficult cancers..

Quoted message said:

not only are ineffective in providing a cure,

The BIG LIE. Chemotherapy has a high cure rate with
lymphoma, leukemias, childhood cancers and even with
metastatic testicular cancer. It significantly increases the
long term cure rate when added to surgery in breast and
colon cancer.

Quoted message said:

but also indiscriminately attack all cells - healthy and
cancerous,

It attacks mainly rapidly dividing cells, ones that are
easily replaced after treatment,

Quoted message said:

causing cellular damage and destruction of the body's
connective tissue, the defense

against

Quoted message said:

cancer metastasis.

Not true, but so what? Chemotherapy is almost exclusively
used in patients who have already metastasised, are
likely to have already metastasised, or who have already
had the primary tumour removed so that further metastases
cannot occur.

Quoted message said:

Both radiation and chemotherapy trigger the development of
new cancers and damage the immune system and body organs.

Not so relevant if a patient has a cancer that untreated (or
treated by ineffective methods) will lead to death. Also,
the incidence of additional second cancers after
chemotherapy is a very small percentage at twenty or thirty
years, much less than the gain in cure rate survival when
chemotherapy is used as an adjuvant to surgery. How is it
preferable to let the first cancer kill you off?

Quoted message said:

In addition, these interventions activate enzymes that
facilitate the release of cancer cells from a localized
area to spread to other organs.

Simply repeating the claim that they facilitate metastasis.
See above.

Quoted message said:

At Matthias Rath Research, we have achieved a breakthrough
in cancer research by defining the cellular mechanisms
involved in cancer proliferation and metastasis and
developed a natural means of controlling these mechanisms.

I say this is [censored].

Quoted message said:

Efficient control of the spread of a disease by collagen-
dissolving enzyme blocks has been successful with several

diseases.

Quoted message said:

This is especially important in diseases for which
orthodox medicine has

no

Quoted message said:

preventive or healing therapies yet. A combination of
natural nutrients formulated to support the body in
curbing metastasis and reversing tumor growth, has been
shown to be effective against a variety of human cancer
cell lines, without adverse effects on normal cells.

Rath offers not a scrap of clinical evidence in support this
claim. The testimonials on his site are even of a shameful
quality for a doctor purporting to be a serious cancer
researcher.

Instead he offers numerous tissue culture experiments which
may show nothing more than that his preparation is toxic to
any kind of cell if added to the culture medium. Certainly
he has not shown that the proliferation of normal cells in
tissue culture is not affected in the same way. Add enough
of any chemical to a tissue culture and the cells will
complain, as innumerable other cancer quacks have
discovered, to their great glee.

Why should I not conclude that this is all a cynical beat-
up, designed merely to sell his products?

Peter Moran.

It wasn't a dark and stormy night when Orac said:

Indeed. I could add bleach at varying concentrations to my
tissue culture flasks, and quite easily "prove" that it is
toxic to tumor cells at very low concentrations. That
doesn't mean bleach is a good therapy for cancer.

LOL! I'd offer you my prolactinoma(sorry, haven't got
anything more interesting) for use in your experiment but
it's in my head at the moment. <g>

Vashti

"Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:40d0c379$0$336$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

causing cellular damage and destruction of the body's
connective tissue, the defense

against

Quoted message said:

cancer metastasis.

Not true, but so what? Chemotherapy is almost exclusively
used in patients who have already metastasised, are
likely to have already metastasised, or who have already
had the primary tumour removed so that further metastases
cannot occur.

I missed something at first reading of this. Of course, Rath
is looking for a niche in the 'alternative' market where a
some unfortunate cancer sufferers are being seduced into NOT
having any proper medical treatment of their primary cancer.
So they do remain in permanent dread of metastases.

I have now many examples where such patients have had to
watch their cancers growing and growing, and ulcerating and
bleeding, and becoming ever more painful, while they
desperately to cling to "the faith", trying an ever
expanding combination of "alternatives".

It is interesting that despite the evidence of their own
senses, such patients rarely do ever realise they have been
sold an extremely evil bill of goods, or at least I have
never seen one admit to this.

In a few cases their choice has been reasonably rational,
when the prognosis with conventional treatment was pretty
hopeless anyway, but even those may have been denied useful
palliation.

Peter Moran .

In article
<[email hidden]
.au>,

Peter Moran said:

Rath offers not a scrap of clinical evidence in support
this claim. The testimonials on his site are even of a
shameful quality for a doctor purporting to be a serious
cancer researcher.

Instead he offers numerous tissue culture experiments
which may show nothing more than that his preparation is
toxic to any kind of cell if added to the culture medium.
Certainly he has not shown that the proliferation of
normal cells in tissue culture is not affected in the same
way. Add enough of any chemical to a tissue culture and
the cells will complain, as innumerable other cancer
quacks have discovered, to their great glee.

Indeed. I could add bleach at varying concentrations to my
tissue culture flasks, and quite easily "prove" that it is
toxic to tumor cells at very low concentrations. That
doesn't mean bleach is a good therapy for cancer.

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do
|you inconvenience me with questions?"

a guy called in on coastocoastam.com talk show.......he says
his friend is in prison in plymouth or dartmouth mass by us
gov. for discovering cheap cure for cancer that would cost
med prof billions lost $.......he says cure is : in a
blender put raw almonds,raw garlic,raw onions.....make
paste... eat daily.....guy sounded for real...

Quoted message said:

a guy called in on coastocoastam.com talk show.......he
says his friend is in prison in plymouth or dartmouth mass
by us gov. for discovering cheap cure for cancer that would
cost med prof billions lost $.......he says cure is : in a
blender put raw almonds,raw garlic,raw onions.....make
paste... eat daily.....guy sounded for real...

I hope you like wearing prison stripes and showering with
other guys. You are *SO* Busted!