General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

AMA considers two important proposals

Started by Zee · · Last activity · 3 posts · 577 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 June 2004
Last activity
19 June 2004
Original author
Zee
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
577
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Would number 1 have prevented the statin and paxil fiascos,
    for example? And the very idea of number 2 is laughable:
    imagine some drug ho sitting in on your medical
    consulation...

    Medical group to debate firms' influence on doctors

    By Lindsey Tanner Associated Press

    CHICAGO - Drug companies' influence on medical research and
    on doctors themselves will be under the microscope as the
    nation's largest group of physicians gathers for its annual
    meeting this week.

    Proposals facing the American Medical Association include

    1. ...a measure seeking to make all drug-study results
    public, even unpublished research funded by
    pharmaceutical companies that might reflect poorly on
    their products.

    The measure stems partly from concern over unpublished data
    linking some antidepressants to suicidal behavior in
    children. Government officials are investigating the
    potential link.

    2....Another measure would strengthen a policy the AMA
    adopted last year on ``shadowing,'' the practice of drug-
    company representatives sitting in on patients' visits
    with their doctors.

    Critics say the practice is an attempt to influence what
    medicines are prescribed. Drug companies say the practice is
    educational, but they sometimes pay hundreds of dollars a
    day to the doctors for these visiting rights -- money the
    new measure says doctors should refuse.

  2. [email hidden] (Zee) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Would number 1 have prevented the statin and paxil
    fiascos, for example? And the very idea of number 2 is
    laughable: imagine some drug ho sitting in on your medical
    consulation...

    Medical group to debate firms' influence on doctors


    \

    Ahhhhh, the ever elusive debate on the giagantic billion
    dollar drug industry and it's powerful influence on what
    goes on in the examination room. Humm, I recently went to my
    electrophysiolgist-cardiologist for a visit and since I need
    a new pacer assist device a bossy [censored] of a
    representative from a pacer company actually came into the
    examining room as if he were either a nurse or a doctor
    without asking my permission.

    He then wanted to interrogate my pacer!

    I told him NO, he didn't have the right to suck what was
    left of my battery and B) I would call him if I was
    interested in his companies device (I'm pretty loyal to my
    own company at the moment).

    Anyway, I just thought "What gall this [censored] has!"

    Oh, and I really like the time Medtronics took me and a
    medical employee for a steak dinner and Broadway play just
    so they could talk about their latest device. Hummmmm. They
    like influencing those who are on the front lines who will
    share their opinions with the patient or make suggestions.
    It's such bribery.

  3. "Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Zee) wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Would number 1 have prevented the statin and paxil
    fiascos, for example? And the very idea of number 2 is
    laughable: imagine some drug ho sitting in on your
    medical consulation...

    Medical group to debate firms' influence on doctors


    \

    Ahhhhh, the ever elusive debate on the giagantic billion
    dollar drug industry and it's powerful influence on what
    goes on in the examination room. Humm, I recently went to
    my electrophysiolgist-cardiologist for a visit and since I
    need a new pacer assist device a bossy [censored] of a
    representative from a pacer company actually came into the
    examining room as if he were either a nurse or a doctor
    without asking my permission.

    He then wanted to interrogate my pacer!

    I told him NO, he didn't have the right to suck what was
    left of my battery and B) I would call him if I was
    interested in his companies device (I'm pretty loyal to my
    own company at the moment).

    Anyway, I just thought "What gall this [censored] has!"

    Oh, and I really like the time Medtronics took me and a
    medical employee for a steak dinner and Broadway play just
    so they could talk about their latest device. Hummmmm.
    They like influencing those who are on the front lines who
    will share their opinions with the patient or make
    suggestions. It's such bribery.

    Yes. There should be an ethics rule that you can't accept
    anything worth over $5 from a drug company if you are in a
    position to recommend their products.

    Bill

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.