General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

3000 to steeplechase

Started by K.Soza · · Last activity · 4 posts · 880 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 July 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
K.Soza
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
880
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. for a man, how much time do you take off roughly, over
    barriers....as a % even...say, my time is 9 min for the flat
    3000, what should it be over the barriers?? cheers for any
    replies FRED

  2. K.Soza GY@haddockandchips said:

    for a man, how much time do you take off roughly, over
    barriers....as a % even...say, my time is 9 min for the
    flat 3000, what should it be over the barriers??

    On record times, the difference is 35-40 seconds. That
    scales to 45 seconds or so at your pace. But that's a tough
    goal, because it assumes that you're no more affected by the
    barriers than the top athletes.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflord

  3. Donovan Rebbechi <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On record times, the difference is 35-40 seconds.

    That is not to say that every top class steeplechaser
    can run the 3000m 35s faster or that no steeplechaser
    can run his main event less than 35s slower than he does
    the 3000m:-)

    (OTOH not every steeplechasers PBs or SBs on both are o
    equal quality or reflect his true potential.)

    Quoted message said:

    That scales to 45 seconds or so at your pace. But that's a
    tough goal, because it assumes that you're no more
    affected by the barriers than the top athletes.

    The faster you run, the easier it is to get airborne over
    the hudles and the less extra energy is required. This may
    or not be so, though:-)

    When female runners were finally allowed to compete in the
    steeplechase, their times were AFAIK in the region of 70-90s
    slower than their 3000m times. The gap has narrowed down
    among the international top, but it´s still in that ballpark
    for instance among Finnish women who only compete about once
    a year (for the title). (Note that the hurdles are 15cm
    lower than in the male event.)

    It would be a safe - and I hope not impolite:-) - guess to
    say that a 9min male runner shouldn´t expect to be less than
    60s slower in the steeplechase. At least not in his first
    season at it.

    Anders (who´s heard that the steeplechase is usually the
    event with least - as in: by showing up you´re in the points
    - number of participants at Masters´ Champ´s)

  4. Anders Lustig said:


    Anders (who´s heard that the steeplechase is usually the
    event with least - as in: by showing up you´re in the
    points - number of participants at Masters´ Champ´s)

    ; ) One of the local collegiate runners made NCAA nationals
    in steeplechase. The story on tv was that he saw people
    running steeplechase, and it looked like they were running
    slow enough for him. He apparently has trouble with mental
    focus in 5k, but with barriers every 100m in steeplechase,
    it keeps his attention focused 🙂 (that was from an
    interview with him on tv, so sound bites might be taken out
    of context a little, but he looked like he would've been
    using a "😉" if writing on r.r)

    Dot

    --
    "Success is different things to different people" -Bernd
    Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.