"Bigbazza" <[email hidden]> wrote in
:"]news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:I can only 'blame' King George 3rd...for letting you all
get away from us....He definately should have not charged
the tax on the shipment of 'Tea' to you're Boston Folks to
have their 'Boston Tea Party'
Although it has become known as the primary reason, taxation
was one of the causes but not the sole cause of the
Revolution. Reports at the time were much more focussed on
the "intolerable" Quebec Act (1774) which gave the Ohio
region to Quebec and also made obvious the fact that King
George tolerated the practice of "popery". He was even
accused by the revolting of having gone soft on Rome, as
though that were a bad thing.
solon.orgPreConfedOpen ↗
eration/qa_ 1774.html
college.hmco.comah 07Open ↗
3000 _quebecact.htm
A resolution was passed by the Continental Congress (October
1774) criticizing several Acts by Geo. Rex (actually
Parliament) among which the act "establishing the Roman
Catholic Religion in the province of Quebec" and other
measures aimed at the French-speaking subjects of the King.
historycarper.comdarotfcc.htmOpen ↗
A few days later (26 October 1774) the Continental Congress
wrote a letter to the inhabitants of Quebec calling upon
them to join, in a spirit of brotherhood, the upcoming
revolt against London. They wrote another in May 1775,
presumably during or after the Second Continental Congress
in Philadelphia.
encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.comTimeline%20of%20QOpen ↗
uebec% 20history%20(1774%20to%201790)
The duplicity of this approach was not lost on us and the
suggestion was properly rejected. The result was that the
French fought on the side of the crown of England in 1775
and later in 1812, thus preventing the US from gaining a
firm foothold in the Saint-Laurent basin.
--
Certainty of death. Small chance of success. What are we
waiting for?
Gimli, son of Gloín