Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Virgin SS RR - short and sweet!

Started by Zilla · · Last activity · 11 posts · 414 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
27 June 2004
Last activity
1 July 2004
Original author
Zilla
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
414
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ok on an earlier post I mentioned I built this.
    I ended up with a 34t(f) and 18t(r) combo.

    http://home.bellsouth.net/p/pwp-foutsc

    I went to my favorite "beginner" trails since it was
    after all my first time on an SS, and the first ride
    for the SS above. (Actually it's my first ride on a
    hardtail too, with bar ends at that.)

    I was able to do one loop on the whole trail system
    in around 45 mins, which normally takes me 30-35
    mins. on my FS. I was in a way test riding the bike
    and myself so I purposely went slow. I had to be off
    the seat a lot more, WAY more, say 90%, on this bike.
    I had learn to absorb the bumps with my arms and
    legs. On descents that I normally bomb on, I was
    hitting the brakes. On climbs that I normally just sit
    on, I had to stand up, and push AND pull (advantage
    of clipless pedals). I liked having the bar ends for
    this reason. I missed one climb since I was "thinking"
    rather than just reacting the first time. The next time
    I came across it was no problem. I was (surprisingly)
    able to clear a couple of logs, and log triangles too.
    The 34t/18t combo seems to work well with me too
    since I'm able to spin on flats and descents and
    climb on hills (albeit small hills on this trail system).

    I only took a short ride since I didn't want to push the
    bike and myself too much. More so, I have now have to
    it for the next ride. I may have to move the rear cog
    on spacer in for better chain alignment for example.
    Also, I have to cable-tie my front brake housing further
    down on the fork since it was rubbing the knobbies
    on my tire and it was driving me crazy. I'm NOT more
    tired than any other ride though; my legs and knees
    are fine.

    So far I like the bike. I feel like it keeps me honest
    with my abilities. I was surprised that I was able to
    do some moves on it (clear logs) but was NOT
    surprised that I wasn't able to clear one of the
    climbs.

    BTW, why NOT have a triple front (except for weight
    of course)? The big ring acts as a bash guard, and
    the granny ring acts as a "fall to" ring. In one ocassion,
    the (7-spd chain) came of the middle ring and went
    on the granny gear. Otherwise it would just have been
    on the frame.

    --
    - Zilla
    Cary, NC
    (Remove XSPAM)

  2. Zilla said:


    BTW, why NOT have a triple front (except for weight
    of course)? The big ring acts as a bash guard, and
    the granny ring acts as a "fall to" ring. In one ocassion,
    the (7-spd chain) came of the middle ring and went
    on the granny gear. Otherwise it would just have been
    on the frame.

    Way to get after it!

    There's really no prob leaving the triple on there...except
    for looks.

    G

  3. Zilla said:

    Ok on an earlier post I mentioned I built this.
    I ended up with a 34t(f) and 18t(r) combo.

    http://home.bellsouth.net/p/pwp-foutsc

    I went to my favorite "beginner" trails since it was
    after all my first time on an SS, and the first ride
    for the SS above. (Actually it's my first ride on a
    hardtail too, with bar ends at that.)

    I was able to do one loop on the whole trail system
    in around 45 mins, which normally takes me 30-35
    mins. on my FS.

    Uh, oh. In no time you'll be doing it in 25 Minutes and then it will be too
    late. You'll be hooked. Don't say I didn't warn you.

    Matt

  4. Zilla said:

    ... I missed one climb since I was "thinking"
    rather than just reacting the first time. The next time
    I came across it was no problem. ...

    Yes, you sometimes have to be mentally ready for them
    rather than reaching for the shifter. This gets more
    natural quickly.

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, why NOT have a triple front (except for weight
    of course)? The big ring acts as a bash guard, and
    the granny ring acts as a "fall to" ring. In one ocassion,
    the (7-spd chain) came of the middle ring and went
    on the granny gear. Otherwise it would just have been
    on the frame.

    Leaving it on is fine - the extra weight isn't that much
    unless the big ring is steel. Personally I like the
    minimalist aspect of a singlespeed with as few extras as
    necessary. If you use non-Hyperglide chainring and cog,
    the chain will stay on a little better. (Expensive
    boutique items aren't necessary - inexpensive rings
    w/o ramps and cut teeth also work.) If it's a recurring
    problem a chain watcher like the 'N Gear Jump Stop
    will help.

    If you aren't careful I'll put up a picture of the
    Homeliest Singlespeed Ever ...

  5. Zilla said:

    BTW, why NOT have a triple front (except for weight
    of course)? The big ring acts as a bash guard,

    But normally, the ring is covered with a chain anyway, so you even if you
    do clank it, you're not going to kill teeth.

    Quoted message said:

    the granny ring acts as a "fall to" ring. In one ocassion,
    the (7-spd chain) came of the middle ring and went
    on the granny gear. Otherwise it would just have been
    on the frame.

    Because, unlike your bike, SS bikes tend to not have any chain slack. The
    chances of the chain bouncing off to the inside are minimal, to say the
    least. And besides, you still have to get off and put the chain back on
    anyway, so what difference does it make?

  6. bomba said:
    Zilla said:

    BTW, why NOT have a triple front (except for weight
    of course)? The big ring acts as a bash guard,

    But normally, the ring is covered with a chain anyway, so you even if
    you do clank it, you're not going to kill teeth.

    Yes this makes sense. But doesn't this kill the chain?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    the granny ring acts as a "fall to" ring. In one ocassion,
    the (7-spd chain) came of the middle ring and went
    on the granny gear. Otherwise it would just have been
    on the frame.

    Because, unlike your bike, SS bikes tend to not have any chain slack.
    The chances of the chain bouncing off to the inside are minimal, to
    say the least. And besides, you still have to get off and put the
    chain back on anyway, so what difference does it make?

    Ok..

    --
    - Zilla
    Cary, NC
    (Remove XSPAM)

  7. "Zilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok on an earlier post I mentioned I built this.
    I ended up with a 34t(f) and 18t(r) combo.

    http://home.bellsouth.net/p/pwp-foutsc

    I went to my favorite "beginner" trails since it was
    after all my first time on an SS, and the first ride
    for the SS above. (Actually it's my first ride on a
    hardtail too, with bar ends at that.)

    Good place to cut your teeth.

    Quoted message said:


    I was able to do one loop on the whole trail system
    in around 45 mins, which normally takes me 30-35
    mins. on my FS. I was in a way test riding the bike
    and myself so I purposely went slow. I had to be off
    the seat a lot more, WAY more, say 90%, on this bike.
    I had learn to absorb the bumps with my arms and
    legs. On descents that I normally bomb on, I was
    hitting the brakes. On climbs that I normally just sit
    on, I had to stand up, and push AND pull (advantage
    of clipless pedals). I liked having the bar ends for
    this reason. I missed one climb since I was "thinking"
    rather than just reacting the first time. The next time
    I came across it was no problem. I was (surprisingly)
    able to clear a couple of logs, and log triangles too.
    The 34t/18t combo seems to work well with me too
    since I'm able to spin on flats and descents and
    climb on hills (albeit small hills on this trail system).


    No kidding. Sure engages far more of the rider, and lots more
    standing, reefing with your arms, screaming, spitting and hollering to
    get up hills on a SS.

    Quoted message said:

    I only took a short ride since I didn't want to push the
    bike and myself too much. More so, I have now have to
    it for the next ride. I may have to move the rear cog
    on spacer in for better chain alignment for example.
    Also, I have to cable-tie my front brake housing further
    down on the fork since it was rubbing the knobbies
    on my tire and it was driving me crazy. I'm NOT more
    tired than any other ride though; my legs and knees
    are fine.

    So far I like the bike. I feel like it keeps me honest
    with my abilities.

    Interesting comment. SS sure tests your skill and ability to work the
    trail, to squeeze every ounce out of yourself and the terrain.

    I was surprised that I was able to

    Quoted message said:

    do some moves on it (clear logs) but was NOT
    surprised that I wasn't able to clear one of the
    climbs.

    BTW, why NOT have a triple front (except for weight
    of course)? The big ring acts as a bash guard, and
    the granny ring acts as a "fall to" ring. In one ocassion,
    the (7-spd chain) came of the middle ring and went
    on the granny gear. Otherwise it would just have been
    on the frame.

    I have 2 on my SS. Big one is a ground down bash guard, and middle
    once carries the chain. No little one. And gonna scrap the bash
    guard in about a week.
    The "why not" answer is the beauty and simplicity of "no shifting
    options", you just ride and don't have to think about it.

    paladin

  8. "Zilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok on an earlier post I mentioned I built this.
    I ended up with a 34t(f) and 18t(r) combo.


    Wow, what a great idea! Have you thought about pulling the engine out of
    your car, to simplify all the thought that must go into turning it on,
    shifting, accelerating, and other confusions that take away from the pure
    enjoyment of driving a car ? ;-)

    Dan V

  9. Dan VO2lker says:

    Quoted message said:

    Wow, what a great idea! Have you thought about pulling the engine out of
    your car, to simplify all the thought that must go into turning it on,
    shifting, accelerating, and other confusions that take away from the pure
    enjoyment of driving a car ? ;-)

    I knew optimism was the wrong choice... ;-P

    Steve

  10. Dan Volker said:

    "Zilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok on an earlier post I mentioned I built this.
    I ended up with a 34t(f) and 18t(r) combo.


    Wow, what a great idea! Have you thought about pulling the engine out
    of your car, to simplify all the thought that must go into turning
    it on, shifting, accelerating, and other confusions that take away
    from the pure enjoyment of driving a car ? ;-)

    Dan V

    No but I learned to drive just on 2nd gear on an
    old car! I guess that's single-speeding?

    --
    - Zilla
    Cary, NC
    (Remove XSPAM)

  11. Dan Volker said:

    "Zilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok on an earlier post I mentioned I built this.
    I ended up with a 34t(f) and 18t(r) combo.


    Wow, what a great idea! Have you thought about pulling the engine out
    of your car, to simplify all the thought that must go into turning
    it on, shifting, accelerating, and other confusions that take away
    from the pure enjoyment of driving a car ? ;-)

    Dan V

    Hehehehe,
    Dan you are one committed masochist. I really thought you'd had your fill
    of the single-speed wars. I gotta respect your perseverance if nothing
    else.

    Tom

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.