On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:03:18 +0100, "Doki" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
"Helen Deborah Vecht" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]>typed
Quoted message said:A friend has been analysing Stats 19 forms (accident returns).
Apparently
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:"serious" injuries include anything from a bruised elbow to a coma
leading
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:to death after a period of more than 30 days. The medical attention
required for slight injuries apparently incudes "a cup of tea."
Quoted message said:Well, it amused me anyway :-)
Once upon a time (IIRC) 'serious' was defined as an injury resulting in
48 hours in hospital. Seemed fair to me...
I've read that when the Police / Ambulance attend an accident, they have to
record it then as serious or not. So it's not always the world's best data.
Serious injury:
An injury for which a person is detained in hospital as an
"in-patient", or any of the following injuries whether or not they are
detained in hospital: fractures, concussion, internal injuries,
crushings, burns (excluding friction burns), severe cuts and
lacerations, severe general shock requiring medical treatment and
injuries causing death 30 or more days after the accident.
As you can see, a paramedic could treat somebody at the scene yet it
could still be defined as a serious injury.
The police define what is serious and what is slight. There have been
allegations that they are pressured by the government to shift more
and more injuries from the "serious" category to "slight", because in
the "KSI" figures (which mean everything in road safety) serious
inuries account for 90% of the figures, and one less serious makes a
big difference.
Gareth