Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

rotor cranks

Started by ari · · Last activity · 3 posts · 867 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
11 April 2004
Last activity
11 April 2004
Original author
ari
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
867
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From reading their site (www.rotorcranks.com), it looks like one of the
    crank arms is arranged at 1 o'clock while the other is in the
    traditional 6 o'clock.

    If I had a shimano octalink splined BB/cranks, could'nt I just install
    one of the arms incorrectly in order to achieve the same effect? The
    rotor cranks are >$500 and I have no idea why, what am I missing.

  2. "ari" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8c1ec.400$fS6.317@okepread01...

    Quoted message said:

    From reading their site (www.rotorcranks.com), it looks like one of the
    crank arms is arranged at 1 o'clock while the other is in the
    traditional 6 o'clock.

    If I had a shimano octalink splined BB/cranks, could'nt I just install
    one of the arms incorrectly in order to achieve the same effect? The
    rotor cranks are >$500 and I have no idea why, what am I missing.

    It looks like they switch twice each time each pedal rotation so that your
    top foot is always slightly past 12:00 when your bottom foot is at 6:00.
    I'm not sure it's as far ahead as 1:00, but let's say it is. If you fixed a
    regular set of cranks to achieve the 1&6 position when one foot was up, they
    would be at a 11&6 position when the other foot was up, causing a loss in
    power.

    --
    Scott Ehardt
    http://www.scehardt.com

  3. ari may have said:

    From reading their site (www.rotorcranks.com), it looks like one of the
    crank arms is arranged at 1 o'clock while the other is in the
    traditional 6 o'clock.

    If I had a shimano octalink splined BB/cranks, could'nt I just install
    one of the arms incorrectly in order to achieve the same effect? The
    rotor cranks are >$500 and I have no idea why, what am I missing.

    No, the idea behind the rotor cranks is that the pedals do not work
    precisly in synch at all; as the BB shaft rotates, each crank's
    position relative to it *changes*, increasing the mechanical advantage
    of the leg where it supposedly can be beneficial to do so, and
    speeding the return of the foot to the power production point in the
    cycle. That's the theory. In practice, they're heavy, and they're
    not proven to be sufficiently beneficial to make me have the least
    interest in them. In particular, I have yet to see any definitive
    information regarding how much friction loss there is within the
    system itself; this could easily outweigh any supposed advantage.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.