can anyone direct me to a manufacturer for this? seems 6 degrees is the norm, I would prefer not to use an adjustable shim system but...
(some ppl call this a 0 degree rise because when paired with a 73/74 degree head angle the stem looks parallel to the ground)
By my recollection, 0º rise stems dropped out of fashion (as far as manufacturers were concerned) about 8+ years ago ... undoubtedly, due to a lack of consumer demand because they required a higher spacer stack for a given handlebar placement relative to the the rest of the bike.
So, you're probably SOL if you want a CF stem with 0º rise.
Not carbon tho. Lots of $ for no real advantage, IMO.
Yup. What he said.
Also, a 0° stem is also called a 90° stem. It is NOT, however, parallel to the ground. A 17° or 73° stem can be made parallel to the ground. There seems to be two ways that are used to measure rise/drop of stems: the first is measured from a line perpendicular to the steering axis, and the second is measured from the steering axis clockwise toward the line perpendicular to the steering axis.
Do ya'll know if that Ritchey WCS 4-axis uses shims to acheive my desired 17 degree configuration?
wasnt this all easier before there were threadless systems, a 73 degree road stem was easily identified through direct measurement or 'by eye' track stems of 65, 63 or 58 were a little tougher to differentiate but a protractor could always do the job... ;-)
Do ya'll know if that Ritchey WCS 4-axis uses shims to acheive my desired 17 degree configuration?
wasnt this all easier before there were threadless systems, a 73 degree road stem was easily identified through direct measurement or 'by eye' track stems of 65, 63 or 58 were a little tougher to differentiate but a protractor could always do the job... ;-)
No, it doesn't require shims. As it happens, they are quite good stems.