Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

1990 trek 2500 pro road bike

Started by steveabull · · Last activity · 7 posts · 2,069 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
28 June 2004
Last activity
28 June 2004
Original author
steveabull
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,069
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. does anyone have any experiance with this bike? It has a carbon frame and it is in mint cond. Which trek bike would compare to it as far as quality goes today? It has shimano ultegra 600 parts, and dura ace hubs Also im 6'3" with a 34" inseam it is a 60cm bike do you think it will fit me thanks.

  2. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by steveabull
    does anyone have any experiance with this bike? It has a carbon frame and it is in mint cond. Which trek bike would compare to it as far as quality goes today? It has shimano ultegra 600 parts, and dura ace hubs Also im 6'3" with a 34" inseam it is a 60cm bike do you think it will fit me thanks.

    I owned one back in 1995. (It came stock with DA components). Mine was a 58cm, I'm 5'11" with a 33½" inseam for what it's worth...

  3. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by steveabull
    does anyone have any experiance with this bike? It has a carbon frame and it is in mint cond. Which trek bike would compare to it as far as quality goes today? It has shimano ultegra 600 parts, and dura ace hubs Also im 6'3" with a 34" inseam it is a 60cm bike do you think it will fit me thanks.

    It may have been a near top of the line bike 14 years ago if everythng is original. Stuff has changed alot in 14 years. buy it for what it's worth to you if it fits. That pants inseam or bicycle inseam??Makes a difference.I'm 6' with a 35+" bicycle inseam.

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by steveabull
    does anyone have any experiance with this bike? It has a carbon frame and it is in mint cond. Which trek bike would compare to it as far as quality goes today? It has shimano ultegra 600 parts, and dura ace hubs Also im 6'3" with a 34" inseam it is a 60cm bike do you think it will fit me thanks.

    Mine was 100% DURA ACE 8 speed, inlcuding a DURA ACE Stem with hidden handlebar clamp bolt.
    Very nice bicycle, but will not compare to today's TREK OCLV in ride, weight, or ability to handle wider/taller tires.

    Make sure it fits you!
    It sounds like it would be small for you.
    34" inseam usually means that your pubic bone is about 36".... but you need to know.

  5. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by steveabull
    does anyone have any experiance with this bike? It has a carbon frame and it is in mint cond. Which trek bike would compare to it as far as quality goes today? It has shimano ultegra 600 parts, and dura ace hubs Also im 6'3" with a 34" inseam it is a 60cm bike do you think it will fit me thanks.

    Whoa!

    600 parts and DURA ACE hubs,,,... is it 7 or 8 speed?
    If it is 7 speed, it would likely have the very unique DURA ACE hub that is UG and has a unique freehub body.
    What is the Over Locknut Dimension of th rear drop-outs with no wheel mounted?
    Could you get a serial number and check with TREK to see more of this bicycle's history?

  6. How would the bike compare to the recreational series bikes the 1000 to 1500 bikes

  7. The older bike is a better bike. ..especially if it is in excellent condition. Although stuff has changed alot...the older high end stuff is still much better than the low end stuff out there today.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.