Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

A chart for risk

Started by Greens · · Last activity · 37 posts · 1,014 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 October 2007
Last activity
21 October 2007
Original author
Greens
Posts
37
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,014
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 37
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg

    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about "dangerous"
    activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort of way. It is safe
    for work and not gross or anything.

  2. Greens said:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg
    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about "dangerous"
    activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort of way. It is safe
    for work and not gross or anything.

    Since life is fatal, inexorably, may as well ride now!
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  3. A Muzi said:
    Greens said:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg
    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about "dangerous"
    activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort of way. It
    is safe for work and not gross or anything.

    Since life is fatal, inexorably, may as well ride now!

    No, wait.....

    According to that chart, riding around in a car powered by fireworks
    should still be 34 times as safe as riding a bicycle.....
    ~

  4. Greens said:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg

    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about "dangerous"
    activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort of way. It
    is safe for work and not gross or anything.

    Pretty chart.

    {pause}

    Pretty USELESS, that is!

    Bill "engage in middle activity to prevent first COD" S.

  5. "Greens" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg

    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about "dangerous"
    activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort of way. It is
    safe for work and not gross or anything.

    What isn't discussed is how less active people like cyclists are to die from
    the most serious of risks - heart disease.

    Jeff

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  6. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Greens said:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg
    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about
    "dangerous" activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort
    of way. It is safe for work and not gross or anything.

    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Since life is fatal, inexorably, may as well ride now!

    DougC said:

    No, wait.....
    According to that chart, riding around in a car powered by fireworks
    should still be 34 times as safe as riding a bicycle.....

    Funny.
    If you believe that, go ahead.
    As far as 'riding' versus 'death' observe the 'heart failure' section.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  7. "Jeff" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Greens" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg

    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about "dangerous"
    activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort of way. It is
    safe for work and not gross or anything.

    What isn't discussed is how less active people like cyclists are to die
    from the most serious of risks - heart disease.

    Jeff

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

    Heart disease is number the number one cause of death as listed on that
    chart. Of course heart disease tends to kill an older person. Sooner or
    later something has to take you out and that's why cancer, stroke and heart
    disease are at the top.

    "The average age for a first heart attack is 65.8 years for men and 70.4
    years for women."

    "In 2003, the average age of
    bicyclists killed was 35.8 years,

    and the average age of those

    injured was 26.5 years."

    One way to look at it is by number of years lost. I think the average male
    lives to 70. If he dies by that first heart attack, he only loses 4.2 years
    off his average life expectancy. The average cyclist loses 34.2 years.
    That's nearly half a lifetime vs. 4.2 years. The death of the cyclist is
    therefore more disruptive and tragic. Chances are his kids aren't fully
    grown.

    Considering all the exercise, how much longer is a cyclist going to live if
    he doesn't get hit by a car*? From what I remember he can expect to live 3
    years longer than a couch potato so he risks the loss of half a lifetime to
    gain 3 years and a higher level of fitness throughout life.

    *After all cyclists die of cancer and heart disease too.

  8. Greens said:

    Considering all the exercise, how much longer is a cyclist going to live if
    he doesn't get hit by a car*? From what I remember he can expect to live 3
    years longer than a couch potato so he risks the loss of half a lifetime to
    gain 3 years and a higher level of fitness throughout life.

    It's not a one to one exchange. You are talking about trading a remote
    possibility for a definite probability.

    But I don't think it works like that anyway. I think people who ride
    bikes (or excerice regularly in other ways) live longer because of who
    they are and the types of choices they make, not so much because they
    happen to exercise. I think exercise is more of an indicator than a
    cause.

    Joseph

  9. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Greens" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/dying.jpg
    If you remember that discussion we had some time ago about "dangerous"
    activities. This chart maps out the stats in a vivid sort of way. It is
    safe for work and not gross or anything.

    Quoted message said:

    "Jeff" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    What isn't discussed is how less active people like cyclists are to die
    from the most serious of risks - heart disease.

    Greens said:

    Heart disease is number the number one cause of death as listed on that
    chart. Of course heart disease tends to kill an older person. Sooner or
    later something has to take you out and that's why cancer, stroke and heart
    disease are at the top.
    "The average age for a first heart attack is 65.8 years for men and 70.4
    years for women."
    "In 2003, the average age of bicyclists killed was 35.8 years,
    and the average age of those injured was 26.5 years."
    One way to look at it is by number of years lost. I think the average male
    lives to 70. If he dies by that first heart attack, he only loses 4.2 years
    off his average life expectancy. The average cyclist loses 34.2 years.
    That's nearly half a lifetime vs. 4.2 years. The death of the cyclist is
    therefore more disruptive and tragic. Chances are his kids aren't fully
    grown.
    Considering all the exercise, how much longer is a cyclist going to live if
    he doesn't get hit by a car*? From what I remember he can expect to live 3
    years longer than a couch potato so he risks the loss of half a lifetime to
    gain 3 years and a higher level of fitness throughout life.

    *After all cyclists die of cancer and heart disease too.

    `"In 2003, the average age of bicyclists killed was 35.8 years"
    I'm overdue?
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  10. Greens said:

    "In 2003, the average age of
    bicyclists killed was 35.8 years,

    and the average age of those

    injured was 26.5 years."

    Is that averaging in the fatalities that occur before the age of 12? My
    guess is that the distribution is clustered in the childhood years, with
    an extremely long tail into the post-retirement years and that the long
    tail is what raises the average out of childhood.

    No point lumping in cautious, skilled adult cyclists with incautious,
    unskilled children (who engage in many types of dangerous riding the
    rest of us wouldn't go near). Do you have an average-age-killed figure
    limited to adult, experienced cyclists?

    Mark J.

  11. Mark said:


    Is that averaging in the fatalities that occur before the age of 12? My
    guess is that the distribution is clustered in the childhood years, with
    an extremely long tail into the post-retirement years and that the long
    tail is what raises the average out of childhood.

    Taken alone, an "average" is about the most useless statistic ever
    developed.

  12. ..

    air/space crashes and bicycle accidents? something wrong there

    anyway, yawl making an unfounded assumption here - excercise is not
    proven to increase lifespan
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life.
    as an alternative to excercise yields longer life one could say
    drinking water yields longer life or nutrition, of course yields ...
    but excercise itself does not.
    caws the total group would excercise but not....
    Jim Beatty smoked!
    Pistol Pete...

  13. datakoll aka gene daniels said:

    ...
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life....

    That would only make life SEEM longer. Time drags when your not having fun.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    Beer - It's not just for breakfast anymore!

  14. Tom Sherman said:
    datakoll aka gene daniels said:

    ...
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life....

    That would only make life SEEM longer. Time drags when your not having fun.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    Beer - It's not just for breakfast anymore!

    I ride so fast my internal clock slows down.

    Joseph

  15. aka Joseph Santaniello said:
    Tom Sherman said:
    datakoll aka gene daniels said:

    ...
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life....


    That would only make life SEEM longer. Time drags when your not having fun.

    I ride so fast my internal clock slows down.

    Does your increased mass compensate for the shorter distance?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    Beer - It's not just for breakfast anymore!

  16. Tom Sherman said:
    aka Joseph Santaniello said:
    Tom Sherman said:

    datakoll aka gene daniels wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > ...
    > there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    > of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    > lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life....
    That would only make life SEEM longer. Time drags when your not having fun.

    Quoted message said:

    I ride so fast my internal clock slows down.

    Does your increased mass compensate for the shorter distance?

    I suppose that explains a lot!

    But at least my kit is blue so the guys trying to hold my wheel don't
    lose sight of me as I move south in the visible spectrum.

    Joseph

  17. In article
    <[email hidden]>
    ,

    datakoll said:

    .

    air/space crashes and bicycle accidents? something wrong there

    anyway, yawl making an unfounded assumption here - excercise is not
    proven to increase lifespan
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life.
    as an alternative to excercise yields longer life one could say
    drinking water yields longer life or nutrition, of course yields ...
    but excercise itself does not.
    caws the total group would excercise but not....
    Jim Beatty smoked!
    Pistol Pete...

    You continue to mention CHO. I do not recognize CHO
    as an official chemical formula or as a common usage
    among chemists. What is it supposed to be?

    --
    Michael Press

  18. On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:37:40 -0700, Michael Press <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>
    ,

    datakoll said:

    .

    air/space crashes and bicycle accidents? something wrong there

    anyway, yawl making an unfounded assumption here - excercise is not
    proven to increase lifespan
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life.
    as an alternative to excercise yields longer life one could say
    drinking water yields longer life or nutrition, of course yields ...
    but excercise itself does not.
    caws the total group would excercise but not....
    Jim Beatty smoked!
    Pistol Pete...

    You continue to mention CHO. I do not recognize CHO
    as an official chemical formula or as a common usage
    among chemists. What is it supposed to be?

    Dear Michael,

    http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?Acronym=cho&string=exact

    CHOeers,

    Carl Fogel

  19. Quoted message said:
    datakoll said:

    air/space crashes and bicycle accidents? something wrong there
    anyway, yawl making an unfounded assumption here - excercise is not
    proven to increase lifespan
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life.
    as an alternative to excercise yields longer life one could say
    drinking water yields longer life or nutrition, of course yields ...
    but excercise itself does not.
    caws the total group would excercise but not....
    Jim Beatty smoked!
    Pistol Pete...

    Michael Press said:

    You continue to mention CHO. I do not recognize CHO
    as an official chemical formula or as a common usage
    among chemists. What is it supposed to be?

    Genespeak for 'alcohol'

    http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/alcohol/alcohol_chemistry.shtml
    says, more descriptively, "C2H6O"
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  20. Quoted message said:
    datakoll said:

    air/space crashes and bicycle accidents? something wrong there
    anyway, yawl making an unfounded assumption here - excercise is not
    proven to increase lifespan
    there are significant statistical exceptions to this in a small group
    of early age exercisers, also people tending to exhibit many other
    lifesaving virtues, no CHO, thru life.
    as an alternative to excercise yields longer life one could say
    drinking water yields longer life or nutrition, of course yields ...
    but excercise itself does not.
    caws the total group would excercise but not....
    Jim Beatty smoked!
    Pistol Pete...

    Michael Press said:

    You continue to mention CHO. I do not recognize CHO
    as an official chemical formula or as a common usage
    among chemists. What is it supposed to be?

    Genespeak for 'alcohol'

    http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/alcohol/alcohol_chemistry.shtml
    says, more descriptively, "C2H6O"
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.