General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Aerobic Conditioning for Mountain Climb (LONG)

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 10 posts · 415 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 June 2006
Last activity
16 June 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
415
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am not a runner, but this group seems to have great information about
    aerobic conditioning and heart rate training. I'm hoping someone can
    offer relevant advice.

    I've been training for a guided summit attempt on Mount Rainier in
    about seven weeks. I'm in pretty good condition for my age (62), but I
    have no illusions about the difficulty of this climb: 9,000 feet of
    gain over a 24-hour period with a 40 pound pack, all at altitude and
    mostly over ice and snow. I have done some high altitude hiking, but
    nothing like this. I would appreciate any thoughts about the most
    appropriate type of aerobic conditioning to do in these last few weeks.

    For the past several months, I have been trying to take training hikes
    about twice a week. These are fairly strenuous (for me), typically
    involving 2,000 - 4,000 feet of gain in two to four miles, or about
    1,000 feet per mile, carrying a 40 - 50 pound pack. My rate of ascent
    is around one hour per 2,000 feet of gain. At that pace, my heart rate
    stays between 140 - 160, averaging around 150 (my maximum heart rate is
    naturally high, I think around 190; my resting heart rate is around
    55). I descend fairly slowly to protect my knees and strengthen my
    legs, so my heart rate during the descent stays around 120.

    I also do the Stairmaster three or four times a week for about 30 - 45
    minutes each, usually with a pack. I typically push myself pretty hard,
    keeping my heart rate above 160 for most of each session. Finally, I
    work out with weights for one hour three times a week. I don't monitor
    my heart rate then, but I know it stays elevated for much of that time.
    I work on all major muscle groups.

    My question is whether I should be increasing the intensity of my
    workouts (I don't think I have any more hours to give). I am able to
    push my heart rate up to the mid-160s, and hold it there for an hour or
    longer. From what I've read, I would guess my AT or LT is around 165. I
    can push my heart rate higher, say 175, but it gets pretty
    uncomfortable after 5 or 10 minutes. I won't be racing anybody when I
    do the climb; I just want to be able to reach the summit and return
    safely, without injury (and have a good time). I was thinking about
    trying to work some kind of interval training into one or two of my
    exercise sessions each week. The idea would be to push my heart rate up
    over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it drop back below 140 for a
    couple of minutes, and repeat this pattern. I've heard that this is a
    good and quick way to increase aerobic capacity. I've also read,
    however, that it may not be that helpful if your goal is endurance --
    i.e., to maintain a hard pace for hours at a time. Any advice on this
    would be welcome. Also, I'd be interested to know whether, from what
    I've described, anyone can tell me how close I am to being ready. I
    don't expect to be the fittest or fastest person on the mountain, but
    I'd sure like to know whether I'm seriously behind where I need to be
    by this time.

    I do plan to get some altitude in shortly. I'm told that the effect of
    altitude varies from person to person. I hiked the Inca Trail two years
    ago (the second day has nearly 4000 feet of gain, up to about 13,800
    feet) without problem. However, I didn't carry much weight, and I also
    had a couple of days to acclimate.

    Sorry for the long post, but people have said they need detail to give
    a useful response.

  2. [email hidden] wrote:

    hi caseydoug

    It seems to me that you are VERY serious about your training (and yes you
    have a high heartrate; higher than me and I'm only 43!)....
    What (I think) you need is the long "hard" (medium hard) work where you
    simulate your "race" to get used to / and endurance... And you do that!
    You need strength and you train that! The stairmaster have an error on the
    angel off your foot so if you can crank up a treadmill to lets say 20-25 %
    and walk on that it would be better!

    You talk about some intervals. That will give you the ability to go closer
    to your AT for a longer time. DO you really need to go that close to your
    max??? I don't think so.

    Your rate off ascent 2000 ft/hour w. 40 pounds seems to me as VERY good. I
    run 3000- 3500 when I race mountainraces WITHOUT a backpack and only for a
    few hours!!!!! Ups and I am 20 year younger!

    As I see it you are very determined; well prepared so what I would do if I
    was you is just enjoy your training and remember to enjoy your stay in the
    mountains/on the trails!!!

    And last do a proper taper (ex. train 50% 2 weeks prior to the day and 25%
    or less the last week up to the day)

    I have forwarded your request to a friend off mine (mountaineer and runner)
    maybe you will get an email from him if he got time...

    Good Luck from Denmark!!

    martin

  3. Quoted message said:

    I am not a runner, but this group seems to have great information about
    aerobic conditioning and heart rate training. I'm hoping someone can
    offer relevant advice.

    Sounds like you have a lot of good training under your belt. I think
    you are in better shape than when I climbed Rainier a few years back
    with two friends. I was ~35 YO.

    The biggest training mistake I made was overdoing it a week before
    leaving. Hiking 20 miles at a hard pace up and down mtns with a heavy
    pack, trying to keep up with someone stronger. I strained something
    that I never quite recovered from in time for the trip.

    If I had a do over I would get a very solid aerobic base and increasing
    hike times as the date neared, but no overdoing it as far as intensity.

    Last year planning for a trip out west and a rim to rim grand canyon
    hike. I would hike our local 1000 ft foot molehill with a weighty pack.
    I kept adding repeats until I was doing the loop 7 times in a row to
    get me similar elevation/distance to the rim-to-rim hike. It made Rim
    to Rim easy (8.5 hours South to North rim), but I was fried on MT.
    Whitney. Though I never do well at altitude.

    I would say at this point no real increases in intensity, but really
    try to increase time on feet as much as possible at least once per
    week. Once a week even lower the pack weight a bit and go longer for
    more distance/elevation. Just try to get closer to actual distance you
    will cover in a day.

    I only wish I could be that strong in 10 years, let alone 20. More
    power to you.

  4. Quoted message said:

    I am not a runner, but this group seems to have great information about
    aerobic conditioning and heart rate training. I'm hoping someone can
    offer relevant advice.

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    I do plan to get some altitude in shortly. I'm told that the effect of
    altitude varies from person to person. I hiked the Inca Trail two years
    ago (the second day has nearly 4000 feet of gain, up to about 13,800
    feet) without problem. However, I didn't carry much weight, and I also
    had a couple of days to acclimate.


    Hi,

    Quoted message said:

    From my experience climbing Mt. Shasta altitude is something that you


    can't train for. When I climbed Mt. Shasta I was in very good running
    shape. However above 12,000 feet I was stopping for breath every three
    or so steps. Once you have the strength to hike with a full pack uphill
    then you are in shape. Strength is good but how you react is unknown
    and is difficult to account for.

    Keep in mind that on the day you go for the summit that you won't have
    a full pack so going from a full pack to a mostly empty one is a great
    help. Also if you can, get lots of calories in before you start the
    final climb. I got rather nauseaous on the way up and couldn't eat
    until I returned below 10,000 feet. Another thing is the mental factor.
    one of the aspects of going up in altitude is an increase in apathy.
    There were many times I felt that going to the summit wasn't worth the
    effort, it really played with my mind.

    Concentrate on getting into a rhythm and keeping a steady pace. Keep an
    eye on those around you and try to find someone going the same pace.
    Even if that person is way ahead of you try to match their pace to keep
    going. And don't worry when somebody goes past you, as long as you keep
    steady you'll get there.

    Good luck and hope the weather is good for you.

    Andy

  5. caseydoug said:

    Sorry for the long post, but people have said they need detail to give
    a useful response.

    No need to apologize! You hit the detail that people would need to give
    you a decent response! And this frequently reflects the level of
    experience and/or knowledge of the poster, i.e. you know how to ask the
    question. I plugged your hr values into a zone calculator and your
    descriptions of the efforts were right on for the type training you were
    doing. Basic endurance plus some shorter, higher efforts.

    It sounds like you've done a lot of good training and have a decent
    strength and aerobic base. (A lot better condition than I am.) Others
    have also made comments. You also have 7 wks left to train AND recover
    to be in peak condition for the climb. (note: some of my comments are
    things you may already know, but wanted to make a complete response for
    others following the thread or responding to other responders.)

    One thing you might consider is longer climbs, that might better
    simulate the endurance aspect, i.e. time on legs. I know you indicated
    that it's hard to train more, but maybe instead of 2x a week for your
    climbs, make it one long one (or reps), or maybe back to back - or drop
    a weight workout or one longer climb every 2 wks - whatever works for
    you. You mentioned 9000 ft in 24 hrs so wasn't sure if this was a 1-day
    summit push or an overnighter.

    Also, be very aware of your recovery times in your workouts so you don't
    get injured. Since you've been doing this a few months and have a hiking
    background, you've probably got a handle on this, but use caution when
    extending either the duration or the intensity (intervals). This might
    be new territory for you - or maybe not because of your past experience.

    I was looking for information on the routes to get an idea of slope and
    maybe if it was a one-day push or whatever and found this:
    http://www.rmiguides.com/rainier/conditioning.html
    (looks like this might be what you had been following?)

    "Be able to carry a 40-pound pack for five hours on 20-degree snow slopes.
    Be able to ascend steadily for 5,000 feet (slopes up to 40 degrees) in
    seven hours"

    I'm sure you're aware that 20 degree slopes are almost twice as steep as
    20% slopes (what you've been using), so it's good you've been doing some
    additional strength. This is where a Stepmill (wasn't sure if you were
    using Stepmill or one of the other stepping devices) works much better
    than a tm, which usually only go to 15% in US. On snow slopes, you may
    be following in someone's kicked steps, so the steppers may be more
    appropriate than tm on a couple counts (flat footing as well as greater
    strength requirement). Or might you be snowshoeing on smooth surface -
    which is another ball game?

    If you're presently at 2000ft/hr with pack, which I think is really
    good, your 4000 ft climbs are probably about 2 hr up (and maybe 1-1.5 hr
    down?). So this suggests that longer climbs might be helpful. In order
    to accommodate this, you might need to reduce something else.

    The longer climbs will also get you drinking and eating as needed. You
    may not be getting that much of "finding what works for you" on the
    shorter efforts. Hydration at altitude and cooler temperatures is really
    important as is energy (carbs) - and there's a real tendency to overlook
    drinking in cooler temperatures. And don't forget electrolytes.

    Regarding your question on intervals, RMI suggests
    "(3) If you are using a step mill, step moderately (at the high end of
    your aerobic training range) for ten minutes. Every five minutes
    thereafter, increase your pace for 1 to 1½ minutes, then return to
    moderate intensity."

    They suggest upper end of aerobic zone (LT), which makes sense to me.

    You wanted to try:
    "I was thinking about trying to work some kind of interval training into
    one or two of my exercise sessions each week. The idea would be to push
    my heart rate up over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it drop back
    below 140 for a couple of minutes, and repeat this pattern. I've heard
    that this is a good and quick way to increase aerobic capacity. I've
    also read, however, that it may not be that helpful if your goal is
    endurance"

    You're suggesting going beyond LT zone for a couple minutes. This also
    has advantages. When moving with a pack at 14,000 feet on snow,
    everything is hard.

    However, whether it makes more sense to train for over-LT efforts or
    whether to be stronger and more efficient and having larger aerobic
    base, hence spending less time near LT, I would bet *my* training time
    on going for the strength endurance. But I'm slow, so I'm not one to
    listen to. However, their recommendation is to keep it aerobic - hard
    breathing is ok, but keep it below gasping level.

    From their page:
    "We have had success with interval training when we have a minimum of
    three months of training time. "

    Not sure if they mean 3 months total or 3 months remaining.

    Regardless, you probably don't want to increase the endurance aspect AND
    the intensity at the same time. If you have to make your long climbs
    every 2 wks to make room for them, then maybe you could do an interval
    workout in the other week, BUT be sure to allow recovery time - both
    within a week, between weeks, and before the big event.

    One thing you didn't mention with your weights is whether you were doing
    traditional weights (2 legs with barbell or whatever) or something more
    hiking specific, like 1 leg squats, etc. Their balance and agility
    suggestions are also good, esp. for traversing snow. (I live and run
    year round in Alaska, so I spend a lot of time on snow.)

    Regarding altitude acclimation, I've been in lowlands the last couple
    decades (have spent time in CO mtns either hiking or field research
    above treeline), but from what I've read among experienced runners, you
    may not be able to train for it, it varies among people, and it varies
    among different times. You might check with your guide and see what
    their suggestions are.

    Oh, be sure to carry your camera where you can get to it readily!!

    And have fun! Sounds like a great adventure to enjoy.

    Dot

    --
    "Success is different things to different people"
    -Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

  6. Dot said:
    caseydoug said:

    Sorry for the long post, but people have said they need detail to give
    a useful response.

    No need to apologize! You hit the detail that people would need to give
    you a decent response! And this frequently reflects the level of
    experience and/or knowledge of the poster, i.e. you know how to ask the
    question. I plugged your hr values into a zone calculator and your
    descriptions of the efforts were right on for the type training you were
    doing. Basic endurance plus some shorter, higher efforts.

    It sounds like you've done a lot of good training and have a decent
    strength and aerobic base. (A lot better condition than I am.) Others
    have also made comments. You also have 7 wks left to train AND recover
    to be in peak condition for the climb. (note: some of my comments are
    things you may already know, but wanted to make a complete response for
    others following the thread or responding to other responders.)

    One thing you might consider is longer climbs, that might better
    simulate the endurance aspect, i.e. time on legs. I know you indicated
    that it's hard to train more, but maybe instead of 2x a week for your
    climbs, make it one long one (or reps), or maybe back to back - or drop
    a weight workout or one longer climb every 2 wks - whatever works for
    you. You mentioned 9000 ft in 24 hrs so wasn't sure if this was a 1-day
    summit push or an overnighter.

    Also, be very aware of your recovery times in your workouts so you don't
    get injured. Since you've been doing this a few months and have a hiking
    background, you've probably got a handle on this, but use caution when
    extending either the duration or the intensity (intervals). This might
    be new territory for you - or maybe not because of your past experience.

    I was looking for information on the routes to get an idea of slope and
    maybe if it was a one-day push or whatever and found this:
    http://www.rmiguides.com/rainier/conditioning.html
    (looks like this might be what you had been following?)

    "Be able to carry a 40-pound pack for five hours on 20-degree snow slopes.
    Be able to ascend steadily for 5,000 feet (slopes up to 40 degrees) in
    seven hours"

    I'm sure you're aware that 20 degree slopes are almost twice as steep as
    20% slopes (what you've been using), so it's good you've been doing some
    additional strength. This is where a Stepmill (wasn't sure if you were
    using Stepmill or one of the other stepping devices) works much better
    than a tm, which usually only go to 15% in US. On snow slopes, you may
    be following in someone's kicked steps, so the steppers may be more
    appropriate than tm on a couple counts (flat footing as well as greater
    strength requirement). Or might you be snowshoeing on smooth surface -
    which is another ball game?

    If you're presently at 2000ft/hr with pack, which I think is really
    good, your 4000 ft climbs are probably about 2 hr up (and maybe 1-1.5 hr
    down?). So this suggests that longer climbs might be helpful. In order
    to accommodate this, you might need to reduce something else.

    The longer climbs will also get you drinking and eating as needed. You
    may not be getting that much of "finding what works for you" on the
    shorter efforts. Hydration at altitude and cooler temperatures is really
    important as is energy (carbs) - and there's a real tendency to overlook
    drinking in cooler temperatures. And don't forget electrolytes.

    Regarding your question on intervals, RMI suggests
    "(3) If you are using a step mill, step moderately (at the high end of
    your aerobic training range) for ten minutes. Every five minutes
    thereafter, increase your pace for 1 to 1½ minutes, then return to
    moderate intensity."

    They suggest upper end of aerobic zone (LT), which makes sense to me.

    You wanted to try:
    "I was thinking about trying to work some kind of interval training into
    one or two of my exercise sessions each week. The idea would be to push
    my heart rate up over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it drop back
    below 140 for a couple of minutes, and repeat this pattern. I've heard
    that this is a good and quick way to increase aerobic capacity. I've
    also read, however, that it may not be that helpful if your goal is
    endurance"

    You're suggesting going beyond LT zone for a couple minutes. This also
    has advantages. When moving with a pack at 14,000 feet on snow,
    everything is hard.

    However, whether it makes more sense to train for over-LT efforts or
    whether to be stronger and more efficient and having larger aerobic
    base, hence spending less time near LT, I would bet *my* training time
    on going for the strength endurance. But I'm slow, so I'm not one to
    listen to. However, their recommendation is to keep it aerobic - hard
    breathing is ok, but keep it below gasping level.

    From their page:
    "We have had success with interval training when we have a minimum of
    three months of training time. "

    Not sure if they mean 3 months total or 3 months remaining.

    Regardless, you probably don't want to increase the endurance aspect AND
    the intensity at the same time. If you have to make your long climbs
    every 2 wks to make room for them, then maybe you could do an interval
    workout in the other week, BUT be sure to allow recovery time - both
    within a week, between weeks, and before the big event.

    One thing you didn't mention with your weights is whether you were doing
    traditional weights (2 legs with barbell or whatever) or something more
    hiking specific, like 1 leg squats, etc. Their balance and agility
    suggestions are also good, esp. for traversing snow. (I live and run
    year round in Alaska, so I spend a lot of time on snow.)

    Regarding altitude acclimation, I've been in lowlands the last couple
    decades (have spent time in CO mtns either hiking or field research
    above treeline), but from what I've read among experienced runners, you
    may not be able to train for it, it varies among people, and it varies
    among different times. You might check with your guide and see what
    their suggestions are.

    Oh, be sure to carry your camera where you can get to it readily!!

    And have fun! Sounds like a great adventure to enjoy.

    Dot

    --
    "Success is different things to different people"
    -Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

    These are enormously helpful comments. I am very appreciative (and
    impressed). Let me respond to a couple of the suggestions or questions.

    First, yes I am going with RMI. I read their materials a while back,
    but I must confess that I either overlooked or forgot some of the
    points raised by Dot, including their suggestions on interval training.
    And no, I had not caught that they were describing the slope in degrees
    rather than percent. It is my understanding that the total climb
    involves 9,000 feet in about eight miles (hence an average of around
    20%, but apparently with some slopes that are much steeper). RMI
    requires a one-day training course, held at Paradise (5400'😉. I will be
    doing that the day before we start the climb. Then the first day of the
    climb, we leave Paradise early and hike to Camp Muir (10,000'😉, about
    halfway in both distance and elevation gain. I'm told this takes about
    five hours. The second day begins at 1:00 or 2:00 a.m., reaching the
    summit (14,410'😉 in the morning, and then decending all the way back to
    Paradise by that afternoon.

    All of you seem to agree that I need to increase the duration of my
    training hikes. The challenge will be to find hikes that are not too
    far away, so that I don't spend all day getting there. A staple of my
    training has been Mount Si, which is about 3500 feet over four miles,
    and is very close to home. I could do that hike twice in one day,
    perhaps lightening my pack for the second trip. I also want to do one
    or two training hikes from Paradise to Camp Muir. That will not only
    increase my volume, but will give me more experience at altitude. I may
    not be able to condition myself for the altitude, but it would be
    helpful to know beforehand how I am going to respond. If nothing else,
    it will give me a basis for taking Diamox prophylactically.

    Thank you for the suggestion about tapering, Roeret. I did not know
    about that. I did learn the hard way about overdoing it. My first time
    out this season, I carried 40 pounds up Mount Si. It was fine going up,
    but my knees killed me on the way down, and for several days
    thereafter. I lowered the weight for my next hike, and then increased
    it gradually on subsequent hikes, but I still get some pain on the
    descent. Knee braces, walking sticks, and ice have been my friends.

    I found the suggestions from those of you who have done hard climbs to
    be very helpful. Fortunately, I will be doing this with a friend, so I
    will have someone to pace and encourage me. Unfortunately, he is much
    bigger, stronger, and half my age, which means he is a faster hiker
    even though he trains less (carrying 20% of your body weight is easier
    than carrying 30%). :>😉 It's hard not to worry about whether I can
    maintain an adequate pace if I have to strain while others make it look
    easy.

    Dot, you asked about the stair machine. I actually own a Stairmaster
    Freeclimber 4400 PT. It was a great investment, mostly because I can
    and do use it a lot, without having to go to the gym. This is the one
    where the footpads go up and down (not the escalator type). On the
    climb, we will be using crampons, not snowshoes, so I think the machine
    is a reasonably good training device for this. The RMI materials
    suggest a training range of 65% - 85% of HRMax, which for me would be
    124 - 162. For interval training, they suggest spending 10 minutes at
    the high end of that range, and then pushing above the range for
    repeated short periods. So I think my earlier proposal of getting up to
    170 is in line with RMI's suggestion. I'll try it and see how it makes
    me feel. I do know that I experience significant "heart rate drift"
    after about an hour, which means I should be doing intervals only on
    shorter workouts.

    You also asked about my resistance training. It's pretty traditional
    with respect to chest, back, shoulders, triceps, and biceps. With legs,
    however, I am doing lots of lunges, bench stepping, calves, etc.,
    usually holding dumbells. Also lots of core strengthening.

    I feel quite encouraged by what you have said. Also, resolved to do
    longer hikes. Thanks again, all, for the time and effort that went into
    those comments.

  7. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Dot said:

    caseydoug wrote:

    <All of you seem to agree that I need to increase the duration of my
    training hikes. The challenge will be to find hikes that are not too
    far away, so that I don't spend all day getting there. A staple of my
    training has been Mount Si, which is about 3500 feet over four miles,
    and is very close to home. I could do that hike twice in one day,>

    I also agree that you need a more sustained effort. 3,500 over 4 miles
    is a good push and yes you could do it twice but think about trying
    three. You need not just a sustained effort but to get used to moving on
    tired legs. You might want to try the third without the pack or lighten
    it for the first time and then add the pack the next time you do this
    workout. Another option is to do it twice say Sat and then once on
    Sunday. It's another flavor of back-2-back. Obviously you don't want to
    do these too B2B's too frequently.

    I have a hill that is 3,000 over 5 miles and do 4 reps but I'm running
    100 miles with 14k of accumulated up and down. I am out there a little
    longer race day but we both have to get used to moving on tired legs.
    In my case I run some of the ups an run all the down so my time for the
    effort would be less.

    Sure the object is to get into ideal condition such that the climb is
    very easy but we know that is not an easy or possible task short of
    training in the course and for the entire length.

    Quoted message said:

    Thank you for the suggestion about tapering, Roeret. I did not know
    about that.

    A good two maybe three week taper. You want to be fully recovered come
    D-day.

    -DougF

  8. Quoted message said:

    Dot wrote:

    These are enormously helpful comments. I am very appreciative (and
    impressed). Let me respond to a couple of the suggestions or questions.

    First, yes I am going with RMI. I read their materials a while back,
    but I must confess that I either overlooked or forgot some of the
    points raised by Dot, including their suggestions on interval training.
    And no, I had not caught that they were describing the slope in degrees
    rather than percent.


    In a past life, I used degrees as well as pct, so am conscious of the
    difference. I can relate to the difference in going mostly "up" vs going
    mostly "forward", esp. with a pack.

    It is my understanding that the total climb

    Quoted message said:

    involves 9,000 feet in about eight miles (hence an average of around
    20%, but apparently with some slopes that are much steeper).

    That would be my guess.

    RMI

    Quoted message said:

    requires a one-day training course, held at Paradise (5400'😉. I will be
    doing that the day before we start the climb. Then the first day of the
    climb, we leave Paradise early and hike to Camp Muir (10,000'😉, about
    halfway in both distance and elevation gain. I'm told this takes about
    five hours. The second day begins at 1:00 or 2:00 a.m., reaching the
    summit (14,410'😉 in the morning, and then decending all the way back to
    Paradise by that afternoon.

    This might suggest back-to-back days for your long training climbs.
    Sometimes it's easier to keep going one day than it is to get going a
    second day on tired legs. Also, with the early morning starts, you
    should have firm snow for climbing.

    Quoted message said:


    All of you seem to agree that I need to increase the duration of my
    training hikes. The challenge will be to find hikes that are not too
    far away, so that I don't spend all day getting there. A staple of my
    training has been Mount Si, which is about 3500 feet over four miles,
    and is very close to home. I could do that hike twice in one day,
    perhaps lightening my pack for the second trip. I also want to do one
    or two training hikes from Paradise to Camp Muir. That will not only
    increase my volume, but will give me more experience at altitude. I may
    not be able to condition myself for the altitude, but it would be
    helpful to know beforehand how I am going to respond. If nothing else,
    it will give me a basis for taking Diamox prophylactically.

    These are all good ideas. And, yes, with hills that size (greater than
    1-2000ft), I think repeats work almost as well as continuous climbs. At
    least with me, my legs are tired from the downhill, and it's harder to
    go back up than it is to keep going.

    Quoted message said:


    Dot, you asked about the stair machine. I actually own a Stairmaster
    Freeclimber 4400 PT. It was a great investment, mostly because I can
    and do use it a lot, without having to go to the gym. This is the one
    where the footpads go up and down (not the escalator type).

    Super, and that's going to be more specific than a tm.

    On the

    Quoted message said:

    climb, we will be using crampons, not snowshoes, so I think the machine
    is a reasonably good training device for this. The RMI materials
    suggest a training range of 65% - 85% of HRMax, which for me would be
    124 - 162. For interval training, they suggest spending 10 minutes at
    the high end of that range, and then pushing above the range for
    repeated short periods. So I think my earlier proposal of getting up to
    170 is in line with RMI's suggestion.

    Yes, peaking at 170 makes sense to me since that's about 90% max and a
    little above where you think your LT is. Besides learning to tolerate
    those levels, it will also teach you to recognize the effects of getting
    there. I suspect you don't want to push above LT at altitude since it
    could be really hard to catch your breath again.

    If you haven't seen this, I find a chart like this helps with deciding
    what intensity to use (look at % effort and perceived exertion
    (breathing) columns.
    http://www.coachbenson.com/ebtcorr.pdf
    The "% effort" column is the heart rate reserve % (Karvonen)
    (max hr - rest hr) * (% effort) + rest hr
    If you get much above 170, you're probably going into Benson's zone 6.

    I'll try it and see how it makes

    Quoted message said:

    me feel. I do know that I experience significant "heart rate drift"
    after about an hour, which means I should be doing intervals only on
    shorter workouts.

    Hard workouts should generally be short workouts anyway.

    Quoted message said:


    You also asked about my resistance training. It's pretty traditional
    with respect to chest, back, shoulders, triceps, and biceps. With legs,
    however, I am doing lots of lunges, bench stepping, calves, etc.,
    usually holding dumbells. Also lots of core strengthening.

    Those are good leg workouts for this type thing, esp. when the steepness
    may be greater than what you have to train on. They also help with balance.

    With some longer climbs in there, you should be well on your way. Good
    luck.

    Dot

    --
    "Success is different things to different people"
    -Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

  9. Dot said:
    Quoted message said:

    Dot wrote:

    These are enormously helpful comments. I am very appreciative (and
    impressed). Let me respond to a couple of the suggestions or questions.

    First, yes I am going with RMI. I read their materials a while back,
    but I must confess that I either overlooked or forgot some of the
    points raised by Dot, including their suggestions on interval training.
    And no, I had not caught that they were describing the slope in degrees
    rather than percent.


    In a past life, I used degrees as well as pct, so am conscious of the
    difference. I can relate to the difference in going mostly "up" vs going
    mostly "forward", esp. with a pack.

    It is my understanding that the total climb

    Quoted message said:

    involves 9,000 feet in about eight miles (hence an average of around
    20%, but apparently with some slopes that are much steeper).

    That would be my guess.

    RMI

    Quoted message said:

    requires a one-day training course, held at Paradise (5400'😉. I will be
    doing that the day before we start the climb. Then the first day of the
    climb, we leave Paradise early and hike to Camp Muir (10,000'😉, about
    halfway in both distance and elevation gain. I'm told this takes about
    five hours. The second day begins at 1:00 or 2:00 a.m., reaching the
    summit (14,410'😉 in the morning, and then decending all the way back to
    Paradise by that afternoon.

    This might suggest back-to-back days for your long training climbs.
    Sometimes it's easier to keep going one day than it is to get going a
    second day on tired legs. Also, with the early morning starts, you
    should have firm snow for climbing.

    Quoted message said:


    All of you seem to agree that I need to increase the duration of my
    training hikes. The challenge will be to find hikes that are not too
    far away, so that I don't spend all day getting there. A staple of my
    training has been Mount Si, which is about 3500 feet over four miles,
    and is very close to home. I could do that hike twice in one day,
    perhaps lightening my pack for the second trip. I also want to do one
    or two training hikes from Paradise to Camp Muir. That will not only
    increase my volume, but will give me more experience at altitude. I may
    not be able to condition myself for the altitude, but it would be
    helpful to know beforehand how I am going to respond. If nothing else,
    it will give me a basis for taking Diamox prophylactically.

    These are all good ideas. And, yes, with hills that size (greater than
    1-2000ft), I think repeats work almost as well as continuous climbs. At
    least with me, my legs are tired from the downhill, and it's harder to
    go back up than it is to keep going.

    Quoted message said:


    Dot, you asked about the stair machine. I actually own a Stairmaster
    Freeclimber 4400 PT. It was a great investment, mostly because I can
    and do use it a lot, without having to go to the gym. This is the one
    where the footpads go up and down (not the escalator type).

    Super, and that's going to be more specific than a tm.

    On the

    Quoted message said:

    climb, we will be using crampons, not snowshoes, so I think the machine
    is a reasonably good training device for this. The RMI materials
    suggest a training range of 65% - 85% of HRMax, which for me would be
    124 - 162. For interval training, they suggest spending 10 minutes at
    the high end of that range, and then pushing above the range for
    repeated short periods. So I think my earlier proposal of getting up to
    170 is in line with RMI's suggestion.

    Yes, peaking at 170 makes sense to me since that's about 90% max and a
    little above where you think your LT is. Besides learning to tolerate
    those levels, it will also teach you to recognize the effects of getting
    there. I suspect you don't want to push above LT at altitude since it
    could be really hard to catch your breath again.

    If you haven't seen this, I find a chart like this helps with deciding
    what intensity to use (look at % effort and perceived exertion
    (breathing) columns.
    http://www.coachbenson.com/ebtcorr.pdf
    The "% effort" column is the heart rate reserve % (Karvonen)
    (max hr - rest hr) * (% effort) + rest hr
    If you get much above 170, you're probably going into Benson's zone 6.

    I'll try it and see how it makes

    Quoted message said:

    me feel. I do know that I experience significant "heart rate drift"
    after about an hour, which means I should be doing intervals only on
    shorter workouts.

    Hard workouts should generally be short workouts anyway.

    Quoted message said:


    You also asked about my resistance training. It's pretty traditional
    with respect to chest, back, shoulders, triceps, and biceps. With legs,
    however, I am doing lots of lunges, bench stepping, calves, etc.,
    usually holding dumbells. Also lots of core strengthening.

    Those are good leg workouts for this type thing, esp. when the steepness
    may be greater than what you have to train on. They also help with balance.

    With some longer climbs in there, you should be well on your way. Good
    luck.

    Dot

    --
    "Success is different things to different people"
    -Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

    Well, I went out today and hiked Mount Si twice, back to back. I
    lightened my pack to 32 pounds for the first run, and took maybe five
    or six more off for the second. I also resolved to go at a somewhat
    easier pace -- my heart rate took longer to reach 140, then stayed
    around 145 or lower for the first run.

    Interesting results. The first ascent felt really good. Either the
    lighter pack or the less intense pace allowed me to enjoy this hike
    more than I have enjoyed other training hikes. Also, I was surprised
    when I reached the top in 15 minutes faster than the last time I did
    this. At the beginning of the second ascent, I felt as good as I did on
    the first. Then, about halfway up, my legs started to feel heavy, and
    my hips felt tired, just as Doug Freese predicted. After another mile
    or so, I started feeling better again. Maybe I just started ignoring
    the discomfort. Anyway, on this second hike, my heart rate got higher
    (low 150s), but the cardio was never an issue. I had plenty of aerobic
    capacity for this, but my legs did complain. The second hike took about
    15 minutes longer than the first. On the way down, I experienced some
    of the same knee pain I did the first time out, which I thought I had
    put behind me. I'm icing them now.

    So your advice was apt: I will definitely need to continue these longer
    hikes, which I hope will condition my legs, hips, and knees. But first
    I need some recovery time. Fortunately, I'm going out of town for a few
    days to see my grandchildren, and there are no mountains in Brooklyn.
    :>😉

  10. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Interesting results. The first ascent felt really good. Either the
    lighter pack or the less intense pace allowed me to enjoy this hike
    more than I have enjoyed other training hikes. Also, I was surprised
    when I reached the top in 15 minutes faster than the last time I did
    this. At the beginning of the second ascent, I felt as good as I did
    on
    the first. Then, about halfway up, my legs started to feel heavy, and
    my hips felt tired, just as Doug Freese predicted. After another mile
    or so, I started feeling better again. Maybe I just started ignoring
    the discomfort. Anyway, on this second hike, my heart rate got higher
    (low 150s), but the cardio was never an issue. I had plenty of aerobic
    capacity for this, but my legs did complain. The second hike took
    about
    15 minutes longer than the first. On the way down, I experienced some
    of the same knee pain I did the first time out, which I thought I had
    put behind me. I'm icing them now.

    Please be very careful of these sustained downhills especially with a
    backpack. The downs and the constant breaking are very hard on the
    quads and knee joint. If in your effort you will need the same downhill
    strength then by all means go both ways but be very careful with the
    first few times. If you don't need the downhill strength. It would
    almost be helpful to climb up and ride down and then repeat the up. Also
    pay attention to form on the downs. Unless the slope is very step try
    not to let your knees lock on every step. Locking the knees at every
    step places extraordinary pressure on the knee and quad muscles. Try if
    possible to keep your knees always partially bent to avoid locking.

    In any case, don't be surprised if you quads are very tender for a few
    days. I work with over achievers that want to get into ultra races.
    Because they are age group winners or faster they are classically strong
    on hills. The first time I take them on the 1,400 up over 2.5 miles they
    often run up like a bunch of rabbits. After the first time I often get,
    your were right, my quads are toast. We do these runs every other week
    to allow recovery.

    In essence I'm suggesting you be careful with how you ramp up your
    efforts, especially the downhills.

    Good luck!

    -DougF

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.