I never said single trial. If I try this and nothing comes out then the argument that it's just the combination of the oils etc making the stones is bunkum. If something comes out and I mail it off to a lab I can have it analysed. To my knowledge I have no stones. I have posted the ideal way to test it, which I cannot do because I don't have access to a scanner. Anth
<Rich.@.> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Anth said:
If nothing comes out then it's bunkum.
You will conclude it is bunkum if a single trial fails???
What if you have no stones to come out??
What if it only works 95% of the time and you are the 5% it does not work??
Not much of a scientist are you Anth??
Aloha,
Rich
Quoted message said:
Anth
"Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:orac- [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, "Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote:
> Anth , What you need to realise is that those who ridicule the alternative approaches are not > going to be swayed no matter what you or anyone
else
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
says
Quoted message said:
> . I have done the flush many times and I know it works as does my
doctor
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
,
Quoted message said:
HOW do you know it "works"? Did you have an ultrasound of the liver and gallbladder before the treatment confirming that you actually had stones? Do you have ultrasound studies done before and after the
flushes
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
that shows a decrease in the number of stones? Did you actually find stones in your stool and submit them for analysis to show that they actually are stones? If the answer to the last two questions is "no," you don't know the flush "works." You only think or assume it does.
[Snip]
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I never said single trial. If I try this and nothing comes out then the argument that it's just the combination of the oils etc making the stones is bunkum. If something comes out and I mail it off to a lab I can have it analysed.
To
Quoted message said:
my knowledge I have no stones. I have posted the ideal way to test it, which I cannot do because I don't have access to a scanner. Anth
<Rich.@.> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Anth said:
If nothing comes out then it's bunkum.
You will conclude it is bunkum if a single trial fails???
What if you have no stones to come out??
What if it only works 95% of the time and you are the 5% it does not work??
Not much of a scientist are you Anth??
Aloha,
Rich
Quoted message said:
Anth
"Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:orac- [email hidden]... > In article <[email hidden]>, "Bew"
<qw@nonamewhatsover>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> wrote: > > > Anth , What you need to realise is that those who ridicule the
alternative
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> > approaches are not going to be swayed no matter what you or anyone
else
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
says > > . I have done the flush many times and I know it works as does my
doctor
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
, > > HOW do you know it "works"? Did you have an ultrasound of the liver
and
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> gallbladder before the treatment confirming that you actually had stones? Do you have > ultrasound studies done before and after the
flushes
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> that shows a decrease in the number of stones? Did you actually find stones in your stool and > submit them for analysis to show that they actually are stones? If the answer to the last two > questions is "no," you don't know the flush "works." You only think or assume it does. > > [Snip] > > -- > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." > | > |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with > |questions?"
Not if you don't have any stones in the first place. If there are no stones there, then even if the flush WERE efficacious, you would expect nothing to come out. Without an ultrasound of the gallbladder BEFORE any flushes, to document the presence of stones, you have no way of knowing if the flushes do what it is claimed that they do.
Quoted message said:
"Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:orac- [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article said:
Anth , What you need to realise is that those who ridicule the alternative approaches are not going to be swayed no matter what you or anyone else
says
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
. I have done the flush many times and I know it works as does my doctor
,
Quoted message said:
HOW do you know it "works"? Did you have an ultrasound of the liver and gallbladder before the treatment confirming that you actually had stones? Do you have ultrasound studies done before and after the flushes that shows a decrease in the number of stones? Did you actually find stones in your stool and submit them for analysis to show that they actually are stones? If the answer to the last two questions is "no," you don't know the flush "works." You only think or assume it does.
[Snip]
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
Argument :- The flush doesn't work - what comes out is a chemical reaction in the body with the oils. Now I do the flush and nothing comes out either that argument is wrong or I don't have stones. Something comes out I can get it analysed. That's the best I can do without a CT scanner.
Also you claim the flush doesn't work, and in another post you warn again the fact that if it does what it does then the stones could pierce the tubes? I'll find out for myself thanks, then I will know. Anth
"Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:orac- [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, "Anth"
Quoted message said:
If nothing comes out then it's bunkum.
Not if you don't have any stones in the first place. If there are no stones there, then even if the flush WERE efficacious, you would expect nothing to come out. Without an ultrasound of the gallbladder BEFORE any flushes, to document the presence of stones, you have no way of knowing if the flushes do what it is claimed that they do.
Quoted message said:
"Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:orac- [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, "Bew"
<qw@nonamewhatsover>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
wrote:
> Anth , What you need to realise is that those who ridicule the alternative approaches are > not going to be swayed no matter what you or anyone
else
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
says
Quoted message said:
> . I have done the flush many times and I know it works as does my
doctor
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
,
Quoted message said:
HOW do you know it "works"? Did you have an ultrasound of the liver
and
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
gallbladder before the treatment confirming that you actually had stones? Do you have ultrasound studies done before and after the
flushes
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
that shows a decrease in the number of stones? Did you actually find stones in your stool and submit them for analysis to show that they actually are stones? If the answer to the last two questions is "no," you don't know the flush "works." You only think or assume it does.
[Snip]
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with |questions?"
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
Ok started the flush procedure 1 pint of apple juice 20.30 (I will be continuing this till I drink the potion on Saturday and end up in hospital) It's all your fault!!! Anth (Normally I eat very little cooked/procesed food anyways but I do like my sweeties)
"toby jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Also you claim the flush doesn't work, and in another post you warn again the fact that if it does what it does then the stones could pierce the tubes?
You clearly didn't understand what I said.
Quoted message said:
I'll find out for myself thanks, then I will know.
The problem is, you won't.
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
Also you claim the flush doesn't work, and in another post you warn again the fact that if it does what it does then the stones could pierce the tubes?
You clearly didn't understand what I said.
Quoted message said:
I'll find out for myself thanks, then I will know.
We had absolutely no problem with this flush. It worked and caused no discomfort except the hunger for the day. A couple bouts of diarrhea in the late morning and it was basically over except a good healthful feeling or cleanliness.
Many stones came out each time but my wife's gallbladdar was so hard they thought she had cancer. Biopsy on it proved hardened with scar tissue from so much abuse to it. The stones destroyed it. The stones IMO are from the liver mostly and this is excellent for your health to cleanse your liver anyway.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
We'll see. Anth
"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Most of stones for us came out after resuming normal eating again.
Don't
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
wory, you can't miss them because of their turquoise colour.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
(and on top of that I added 8floz of celery juice 20:42) Anth
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
The usual from someone who swears by the scientific method. I will know. The point is you won't and you will still be parroting assumptions that is doesn't work. I will find out. Anth
"Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:orac- [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, "Anth"
Quoted message said:
The problem is I will.
No, the problem is that you think you will know, but you won't.
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me |with questions?"
Did they scan the gall bladder and find stones then no/reduced stones after the flush? Did you get the stones sent off to a lab? Cheers Anth
"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
We had absolutely no problem with this flush. It worked and caused no discomfort except the hunger for the day. A couple bouts of diarrhea in
the
Quoted message said:
late morning and it was basically over except a good healthful feeling or cleanliness.
Many stones came out each time but my wife's gallbladdar was so hard they thought she had cancer. Biopsy on it proved hardened with scar tissue from so much abuse to it. The stones destroyed it. The stones IMO are from the liver mostly and this is excellent for your health to cleanse your liver anyway.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
We'll see. Anth
"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:5pydnfIONJRWRtrdRVn- [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Most of stones for us came out after resuming normal eating again.
Don't
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
wory, you can't miss them because of their turquoise colour.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]... > (and on top of that I added 8floz of celery juice 20:42) Anth > > "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > "]news:[email hidden]... > >