Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Appropriate Use Policy

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 69 posts · 3,329 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
7 February 2005
Last activity
16 February 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,329
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–69 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:26:14 -0000, "Dave Larrington"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    One of the minimal number of classical wossnames in my collection is
    Saint-Saen's Symphony No. 3 on which, if I remember correctly, the Orchestre
    Symphonique de Montréal were in a studio in Canada while Peter Hurford was
    playing the organ parts in Chartres cathedral.

    I have that too :-)

    Peter Hurford is a very nice man, not at all the "behold the Great
    Artist" type. As mentioned elsewhere, his Decca recording of the
    collected Bach organ works is some of my favourite music.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  2. Just zis Guy said:
    Quoted message said:

    Easier than a Mellotron though... ("Tuning Mellotrons doesn't"- Robert
    Fripp).

    Quoted message said:

    I can well believe it.

    The problem was that the electric motors used to run the tapes would
    slow down the more keys you pushed, so the more notes in a chord the
    flatter it would be. So depending on how you'd play it, I guess you'd
    aim for a natural tuning that would be right with the modal number of
    keys used in any given chord you might play in a piece... Good game!

    Mellotrons don't sound anything like the instruments they were meant to
    sound like, but they do sound rather wonderful on their own terms anyway.

    Quoted message said:

    Somewhere on Radio 3's Listen Again there
    should be an interview with Bob Moog broadcast on Sunday evening, if
    you're interested.

    Might dig that out, thanks for the tip.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. Mark McNeill said:

    Wildly OT, I know, but does anybody know of a newsgroup for recumbent
    bikes & trikes?

    There is one around here, that can be uncovered with a suitable "mark as
    read" filter. Signal to noise becomes /actually tangible/ if you put
    the word "Dolan" in it.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  4. Response to Peter Clinch:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Wildly OT, I know, but does anybody know of a newsgroup for recumbent
    bikes & trikes?

    There is one around here, that can be uncovered with a suitable "mark as
    read" filter. Signal to noise becomes /actually tangible/ if you put
    the word "Dolan" in it.

    Oh, he's already in the bozo bin, along with a couple of others.

    I used to lurk here a long while ago, when I was thinking of going bent.
    Now that I am, and have been for over a year, I thought I'd come back,
    though I don't expect to contribute much.

    --
    Mark, UK.

    "For men become civilized, not in proportion to their
    willingness to believe, but in their readiness to doubt."

  5. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:15:34 -0000, Mark McNeill
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Get with the programme, Ed. If you want to hear Bach as Bach heard it
    himself then a harpsichord or an organ is the instrument of choice.

    Quoted message said:

    It's a complex issue, I know, but Bach's approval of the fortepianos he
    tried, and his description of keyboard pieces as just that - pieces for
    keyboard - give a fair amount of leeway for what is right and proper for
    performances of Bach's keyboard works. I was persuaded of some of the
    merits of Bach on the piano by Glenn Gould's two publicly released
    recordings of the Goldberg Variations; if you haven't heard Murray
    Perahia's recording of the same piece, you're missing a most
    extraordinary treat.

    I think I said elsewhere, I prefer the Perahia recording to the Gould,
    although I couldn't say why. Possibly Perahia is more lyrical, I
    don't know.

    Quoted message said:

    <Devil's advocate> But all this begs the question, why on earth should we
    want to hear Bach as Bach heard it?

    That was a response to Ed's assertion that live music is less pure
    than studio recordings. I have no particular preference either way -
    well, maybe a slight preference in that I actually like the sound of
    the harpsichord, but I like piano music as well. Listen to Goldberg
    (played on the piano) back to back with Chopin and Ed's assertions
    regarding the unimportance of influences are shown up for the
    falsehood they truly are.

    Quoted message said:

    Historical accuracy in performance
    is not an aesthetic virtue; I'd submit it has nothing to do with
    aesthetics at all (as witness so many scratchily worthy recordings by
    e.g. Heinrich Goebel and his Cologne bunch). Research may illuminate all
    sorts of details of score or performance; but that doesn't mean that the
    one-to-a-part performances by Rifkin, say, or Jeggsie's sewing-machine
    tempi, are intrinsically *better* - in any sense other than drily
    historical - than Karajan's big-band approach. </Devil's advocate>

    I think you might be arguing with the wrong person here - Ed is the
    one saying that some versions of the classics are intrinsically more
    worthy than others. I have several different versions of a number of
    pieces, each interpreted slightly differently. I like the scholarly
    approach of the Academy of Ancient Music, and I like the balls-out
    Karajan style too.

    Quoted message said:

    Wildly OT, I know, but does anybody know of a newsgroup for recumbent
    bikes & trikes?

    I think there might be one at rec.music.classical but ICBW :-)

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  6. Response to Just zis Guy, you know?:

    Quoted message said:

    I think I said elsewhere, I prefer the Perahia recording to the Gould,
    although I couldn't say why. Possibly Perahia is more lyrical, I
    don't know.

    IMO Perahia's tempi are all pretty much perfect. ISTR he said he
    approached the variations as dances. I have a real love/hate thing with
    Gould: he had an incredible technique, married to mannerisms which can
    (again, of course, IMO) illuminate a piece marvellously (the Partitas,
    the Goldbergs), or be utterly maddening (some of the 48, the English
    Suites, the French Suites, the Italian Concerto, his Haydn, his
    Mozart...).

    Quoted message said:

    I think you might be arguing with the wrong person here

    Indeed, and TBH I wasn't arguing at all - apart from the devil's advocate
    thing, your post just reminded me of arguments I used to have re the
    Historically-Informed-Performance/big-band controversy. There are
    aspects of the HIP movement I love, and I think their recordings should
    form an important part of any collection; but obv., it doesn't follow
    that a HI performance is necessarily closer to The Truth than non-HI.
    But you know that. :-)

    --
    Mark, UK.

    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple,
    neat, and wrong."

  7. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:49:12 -0000, Mark McNeill
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    it doesn't follow
    that a HI performance is necessarily closer to The Truth than non-HI.

    All performances should be historically informed - what the performers
    choose to do with that information is what makes music fun :-)

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  8. Just zis Guy said:

    ...
    The other day I listened back to back to the rondo from Mozart's Eb
    horn concerto no. 4 played by Dennis Brain, Barry Tuckwell and Peter
    Damm. Three very different performances, and any judgment of which is
    best is entirely subjective....

    As a Chicago partisan, I insist you add Clevenger to the list!

    --
    Tom Sherman - Earth

  9. Just zis Guy said:

    All performances should be historically informed - what the performers
    choose to do with that information is what makes music fun :-)

    E.g. Handel-Beecham Messiah. 😉 Has anyone ever sung "Why do the
    nations" better than Giorgio Tozzi [1]?

    [1] Another Chicagoan.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Earth

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.