Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Autoclaved Concrete

Started by Dan · · Last activity · 22 posts · 790 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
1 December 2006
Last activity
4 December 2006
Original author
Dan
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
790
Views / 30 days
7

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. * * Chas said:

    "Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Johnny Sunset said:

    * * Chas wrote:

    >"Johnny Sunset" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >
    >
    >>Dan wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>Concrete isn't a good choice if you want a heavy bike. Pick steel

    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>titanium.
    >>>
    >>>Steel 490 pcf
    >>>Titanium 280 pcf
    >>>Aluminum 170 pcf
    >>>Concrete 150 pcf
    >>>Autoclaved concrete 40 pcf
    >>>Wood 35 pcf
    >>
    >>Depleted uranium has a specific gravity of about 1185 pcf.
    >>
    >>--
    >>Tom Sherman - Post Free or Die!
    >
    >DU has some drawbacks, especially if you ever want to have kids...

    A polymer coating would stop the alpha radiation. DU is safe when
    covered with a barrier that stops alpha radiation (intact powder
    coating would likely be sufficient) and not ingested. The real

    danger

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    comes from DU when it burns and forms oxide particles that can be
    inhaled.

    Guess I won't find a market for my new lead-shielded saddles, then.

    Mark J.

    Tungsten provides better radiation shielding and has a higher density
    than lead.

    Chas.

    Yes, but lead is more (heh heh) "supple" to better fit your anatomy!

    Mark J.

  2. "Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    * * Chas said:

    "Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Johnny Sunset wrote:

    >* * Chas wrote:
    >
    >
    >>"Johnny Sunset" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >>news:[email hidden]...
    >>
    >>
    >>>Dan wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>Concrete isn't a good choice if you want a heavy bike. Pick


    steel

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    or

    Quoted message said:

    >>>>titanium.
    >>>>
    >>>>Steel 490 pcf
    >>>>Titanium 280 pcf
    >>>>Aluminum 170 pcf
    >>>>Concrete 150 pcf
    >>>>Autoclaved concrete 40 pcf
    >>>>Wood 35 pcf
    >>>
    >>>Depleted uranium has a specific gravity of about 1185 pcf.
    >>>
    >>>--
    >>>Tom Sherman - Post Free or Die!
    >>
    >>DU has some drawbacks, especially if you ever want to have kids...
    >
    >
    >A polymer coating would stop the alpha radiation. DU is safe when
    >covered with a barrier that stops alpha radiation (intact powder
    >coating would likely be sufficient) and not ingested. The real

    danger

    Quoted message said:

    >comes from DU when it burns and forms oxide particles that can be
    >inhaled.

    Guess I won't find a market for my new lead-shielded saddles, then.

    Mark J.

    Tungsten provides better radiation shielding and has a higher


    density

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    than lead.

    Chas.

    Yes, but lead is more (heh heh) "supple" to better fit your anatomy!

    Mark J.

    A lot cheaper too!

    Chas.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.