OK, I have 150 miles on my new Corsa and here are my initial
riding impessions. I have been riding an Optima Baron,
almost exclusively, for the last 3 years so I will be making
some comparisons of the two bikes.
The M5 seat of the Corsa is smaller than the Optima seat on
my Baron. It is about 2 inches shorter in length and 1 inch
narrower. The 2" of reduced length is between the 2 bends
of the seat. Overall, the seat fits me pretty well and is
not uncomfortable, although right now I would say that the
Optima seat is a bit more comfortable for me, but that is
likely because I am accustomed to it. With more miles on
the Corsa, I'm sure I'll become more accustomed to it's
seat and it will feel perfectly comfortable. I have no
problem with neck fatigue, or pain, but then I didn't on
the Optima seat either.
My Corsa is the large frame and with the seat stays fully
reclined, the seat clamp is just about right in the middle
of the adjustment range. The seat angle is slightly more
than the seat on my Baron, which is fully reclined, but not
by much. When the handlebars are set for my arms fully
extended, the riser angle is almost perfectly in line with
the head tube. Even with the height adjustment of the stem
fully lowered, the handlebars are still a few inches higher
than I need. The superman position is certainly different
than what I am used to but it is not uncomfortable.
The Corsa is a fast and efficient bike. On a flat, smooth
road, my Baron is faster for the same percieved effort, but
not by much. Into a stiff wind, the Baron also seems to be a
bit easier to maintain speed, but again , not by much. It is
really difficult to quantify any differences, because I only
have about 200 road miles this year. Although the spinning
work I have done, at the local YMCA, have my heart and lungs
in excellent shape, my legs still need some more road miles
and are getting stronger every ride.
The Corsa is definitely quicker, when accelerating from a
stop, and also seems to be a better climber, on the hills
in my area. This is no doubt due to it's lighter weight. I
haven't weighed either bike but my just hefting them, the
Corsa is noticably lighter. Handling is excellent. It is
quicker responding than my Baron but is predictable and
smooth. I am still getting used to it but I am pretty
steady on it right now. Starting is a bit trickier, so far,
but again, I have had no real problems. The stiffness of
the Corsa and overall ride quality, seem to be about the
same as my Baron.
Bottom line, so far, with my limited miles, is that the
Corsa is a very comfortable ride and is certainly capable of
being ridden at a fast pace, by those capable of riding it
so. It might be slightly less efficient on flat, smooth
rural roads but for all long rides, in varied terrain, it is
probably capable of being ridden just as fast as my Baron.
For hillier rides, it might even be faster, for me.
I did a short mile ride last Friday evening, on mostly rural
roads, with light winds, but about 60 percent of the ride
was on a glacial moraine, with rolling, to slightly hiily
roads. Even after going through my home town and riding the
streets for a couple of miles I ended up doing 29.5 miles in
1:32. I did not push myself really hard and only had about
100 road miles for the year. It appears that I might not be
getting many road miles on my Baron for awhile and will be
riding the Corsa.
Harry Jiles