"Andy Chequer" <andy@(youdontwantthisbitinit)thisisasparagus.com> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
|
| "alpamsfq" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
| > Andy Chequer <andy@(youdontwantthisbitinit)thisisasparagus.com> wrote...
| > >
| > > If you want to stick with sqaure taper, I've had good use from the XT
| > (UN72)
| > > BB. It's good cost/durability ratio for me, and I'm a large chap
myself.
| > >
| > > Andy Chequer
| > >
| > >
| >
| > so what's with all the bad reviews on mtbr?
| >
| > mtbr.comproduct 20373.shtmlOpen ↗
|
| > a lot of them say the xt suddenly breaks
|
| They've got their two cents, I've got mine.
|
| > or is this just from people who do 20 foot drops?
|
| Looks like it. It was never designed with such riding in mind. As you originally posted, you
| aren't into that kind of thing, and as I said, it's solid for the price if you stay near the
| ground. Besides, some people on mtbr can break anything (or certainly brag they can).
|
| Andy Chequer
|
|
I concur with Andy on this. I use the UN72 almost exclusively, and I'm even heavier than
ClydesdaleMTB (albeit somewhat shorter) and I've NEVER (knock on wood) broken one. I've worn out a
couple of older ones, but that was in due course.
---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.462 / Virus Database: 261 -
Release Date: 3/13/2003