Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

BB spec-check

Started by kolchek · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,076 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 February 2011
Last activity
20 February 2011
Original author
kolchek
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,076
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi everyone,

    I'm not 100% bike-tech savvy but here goes: My BB needs replacing [play & a bit crunchy], the specs on the stock one are 68 x 124.5. The current chainline is about 50 mm. Seat-tube diameter is 34mm. The clearance between frame & chainring now is 2 mm max. The largest chainring is mounted outside the spider, the 2 smaller are inside.

    The closest BB's to 124.5mm I've found are 122.5mm & 127mm. I'm not quite sure how spacers work, but if I use the 122.5 & move the chainring 1 or 2mm out that should be about spot on. Will a spacer do the trick? I can't quite figure out where a spacer fits/how it works.

    Thanks all - & nice to be here.

    K

  2. complete info here

    sheldonbrown.combbsize.html

  3. Thanks, I'd already read through that but there's no BB listed with the dimensions I require, & no info about adapting a different sized BB to suit, if I'm not mistaken.

    Ta.

  4. Call Velo Orange. They sell BBs and shims, and mentioned on a blog entry that they had advised someone on using shims. I bet they can help you.

  5. try with your LBS, looks like you need a custom fit & repair

  6. Quoted post said:

    Originally Posted by kolchek [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]

    I'm not 100% bike-tech savvy but here goes: My BB needs replacing [play & a bit crunchy], the specs on the stock one are 68 x 124.5. The current chainline is about 50 mm. Seat-tube diameter is 34mm. The clearance between frame & chainring now is 2 mm max. The largest chainring is mounted outside the spider, the 2 smaller are inside.

    The closest BB's to 124.5mm I've found are 122.5mm & 127mm. I'm not quite sure how spacers work, but if I use the 122.5 & move the chainring 1 or 2mm out that should be about spot on. Will a spacer do the trick? I can't quite figure out where a spacer fits/how it works.


    FWIW. IMO, it's probably better to have the crankarms 1.25mm wider than 1.0mm narrower, particularly since your chanring clearance is so tight.

    But, measure your BB spindle again ... and then, a third time.

    FYI. BB spacers sleeve onto the BB cup & fit between the BB shell & the inner edge of the fixed cup to move the driveside away from the bike's center line.

    BTW. If the search becomes too tedious OR expensive, then simply consider a new crank-and-BB combination ...

    • you'll get a set of new chainrings in the process ...
    • if the new crankset that you choose uses the same chainring BCD size, then you can use your old rings, first
  7. Quoted post said:

    Originally Posted by kolchek [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]

    Hi everyone,

    I'm not 100% bike-tech savvy but here goes: My BB needs replacing [play & a bit crunchy], the specs on the stock one are 68 x 124.5. The current chainline is about 50 mm. Seat-tube diameter is 34mm. The clearance between frame & chainring now is 2 mm max. The largest chainring is mounted outside the spider, the 2 smaller are inside.

    The closest BB's to 124.5mm I've found are 122.5mm & 127mm. I'm not quite sure how spacers work, but if I use the 122.5 & move the chainring 1 or 2mm out that should be about spot on. Will a spacer do the trick? I can't quite figure out where a spacer fits/how it works.

    Thanks all - & nice to be here.

    K

    Get the 127, install on dry spindles to 30 ft lbs. Each side is only 1.5mm longer or so. Don't shim or anything like that, not necessary. The 122 will result in the CR hitting the frame.

  8. Thanks all,

    I really appreciate your attention & advice. The 127 seems the way to go.

    Cheers.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.