Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

BB spindle slightly too short

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 15 posts · 885 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
10 December 2007
Last activity
14 December 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
885
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello all,
    I am building my first bike.
    I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    mm's to go.
    So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    perfect...
    What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    do the trick or just destroy the crank?

    Thanks,
    Federico

  2. Quoted message said:

    I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    mm's to go.
    So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    perfect...
    What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    do the trick or just destroy the crank?

    I've actually had some success shimming this way, to salvage toasted
    cranks. I made a shim from an aluminum beverage can, just a right-
    angled piece to cover two adjacent faces of the square. I used lots
    of grease and tightened the bejasus out of the fixing bolt.

    (This is not something I'd do for a paying customer, but I did it as a
    "charity case" for a local homeless guy, and it seemed to work pretty
    well.)

    Another option is to put a spacer under the right-side bottom bracket
    mounting ring.

    This is the traditional item for that:

    http://harriscyclery.net/itemdetails.cfm?ID=836

    Sheldon "Where There's A Will..." Brown
    +---------------------------------------------------+
    | If you oppose making marriage legally available |
    | to all adults, you are promoting promiscuity. |
    +---------------------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  3. Quoted post said:

    Hello all,
    I am building my first bike.
    I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    mm's to go.
    So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    perfect...

    How did you arrive at that diagnosis, especially if the crankset
    *really is* NOS? Are you certain the BB spindle is symmetrical (L/R)?

    Quoted message said:

    What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    do the trick or just destroy the crank?

    IMO, a shim of that sort is a real "last resort" measure. Spacer(s)
    under the right side cup are the easiest/cheapest solution, assuming
    the problem really does lie with the right crankarm.

    Any reasonable LBS should have spacers, or buy online:

    http://www.biketoolsetc.com

    http://www.loosescrews.com

    Quoted message said:

    Federico

  4. Quoted message said:

    Hello all,
    I am building my first bike.
    I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    mm's to go.
    So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    perfect...
    What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    do the trick or just destroy the crank?

    Thanks,
    Federico

    I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.

  5. Peter Cole said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hello all,
    I am building my first bike.
    I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    mm's to go.
    So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    perfect...
    What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    do the trick or just destroy the crank?

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks,
    Federico

    I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.

    I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?

  6. Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hello all,
    I am building my first bike.
    I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    mm's to go.
    So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    perfect...
    What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    Thanks,
    Federico


    I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.

    I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?

    The latter.

  7. Peter Cole said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Hello all,
    > I am building my first bike.
    > I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    > Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    > should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    > My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    > crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    > spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    > mm's to go.
    > So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    > perfect...
    > What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    > What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    > do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    > Thanks,
    > Federico
    I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?

    The latter.

    Hmm....you found that method preferable to either installing the
    proper length BB spindle or placing spacers under the RH cup?

  8. Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    On Dec 11, 6:21 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> Hello all,
    >> I am building my first bike.
    >> I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    >> Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    >> should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    >> My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    >> crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    >> spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    >> mm's to go.
    >> So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    >> perfect...
    >> What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    >> What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    >> do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    >> Thanks,
    >> Federico
    > I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    > the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.
    I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?


    The latter.

    Hmm....you found that method preferable to either installing the
    proper length BB spindle or placing spacers under the RH cup?

    Obviously. I use shims all the time on various locations on bikes, I
    don't see the problem.

  9. Peter Cole said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:

    Ozark Bicycle wrote:
    > On Dec 11, 6:21 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> [email hidden] wrote:
    >>> Hello all,
    >>> I am building my first bike.
    >>> I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    >>> Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    >>> should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    >>> My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    >>> crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    >>> spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    >>> mm's to go.
    >>> So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    >>> perfect...
    >>> What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    >>> What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    >>> do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    >>> Thanks,
    >>> Federico
    >> I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    >> the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.
    > I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    > or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?
    The latter.

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm....you found that method preferable to either installing the
    proper length BB spindle or placing spacers under the RH cup?

    Obviously. I use shims all the time on various locations on bikes, I
    don't see the problem.

    The problem? A concern about distorting the crankarm/spindle
    interface, making the crankarm more likely to have a problem fitting a
    properly sized spindle at another time.

  10. On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:33:00 -0800 (PST), "[email hidden]"

    may have said:

    Hello all,
    I am building my first bike.
    I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    mm's to go.
    So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    perfect...
    What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    do the trick or just destroy the crank?

    As long as the inner sprocket adequately clears the chainstay when
    pedalling, you may not need to worry about it. Unless the front der
    is too close to the crank to shift properly, or you're in a situation
    which necessitates that you must go with measurements and numbers
    alone instead of getting on the bike and trying it out, I'd advise
    riding it to see which front/rear sprocket combination you'll actually
    use most. If those would be closer to being aligned by moving the
    right crank away from the seat tube, by all means, either swap out the
    BB for a longer one, or add a shim under the right-hand BB flange if
    that works. (Sometimes the shim isn't useful; I've had 110mm and
    113mm BB setups on which a shim under the right flange caused the left
    crank to hit the chainstay or caused the left cup to bottom out on the
    end of the shell threads before it clamped the BB.)

    If the setup you've assembled does an adequate job, I'd use it and not
    worry about the numbers.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  11. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    On Dec 11, 6:21 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> Hello all,
    >> I am building my first bike.
    >> I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    >> Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    >> should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    >> My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    >> crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    >> spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    >> mm's to go.
    >> So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    >> perfect...
    >> What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    >> What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    >> do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    >> Thanks,
    >> Federico
    > I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    > the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?

    The latter.

    Hmm....you found that method preferable to either installing the
    proper length BB spindle or placing spacers under the RH cup?

    Once I considered a spacer behind the RH cup but nixed the idea because
    IMO it would have left too little of an overlap at the RH cup/BB shell
    interface. My concern was that the minimal overlap could result in
    stressed and worn right side cup/shell threads.

    For a 75 KG rider with English Al BB cups/steel frame, is there a
    minimum overlap recommended?

  12. Quoted message said:

    If the setup you've assembled does an adequate job, I'd use it and not
    worry about the numbers.

    Thanks for the detailed explanation.
    Unfortunately the current setup doesn't work since the right crank is
    too close to the seat tube and the front derailer isn't able to clear
    the small chainring / big sprocket combination (which is really
    useful!). Also I am afraid that, with such a low chainline, I will get
    a lot of chainrub in the middle chainring / small sprockets
    combination, which I use quite often.
    So I really need to move the right crank further to the right...

    Bye,
    Federico

  13. Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    On Dec 12, 7:35 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > Ozark Bicycle wrote:
    >> On Dec 11, 6:21 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>> [email hidden] wrote:
    >>>> Hello all,
    >>>> I am building my first bike.
    >>>> I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    >>>> Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    >>>> should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    >>>> My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    >>>> crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    >>>> spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    >>>> mm's to go.
    >>>> So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    >>>> perfect...
    >>>> What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    >>>> What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    >>>> do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    >>>> Thanks,
    >>>> Federico
    >>> I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    >>> the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.
    >> I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    >> or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?
    > The latter.
    Hmm....you found that method preferable to either installing the
    proper length BB spindle or placing spacers under the RH cup?


    Obviously. I use shims all the time on various locations on bikes, I
    don't see the problem.

    The problem? A concern about distorting the crankarm/spindle
    interface, making the crankarm more likely to have a problem fitting a
    properly sized spindle at another time.

    Not going to happen.

  14. Peter Cole said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:

    Ozark Bicycle wrote:
    > On Dec 12, 7:35 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
    >>> On Dec 11, 6:21 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>> [email hidden] wrote:
    >>>>> Hello all,
    >>>>> I am building my first bike.
    >>>>> I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    >>>>> Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    >>>>> should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    >>>>> My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    >>>>> crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    >>>>> spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    >>>>> mm's to go.
    >>>>> So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    >>>>> perfect...
    >>>>> What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    >>>>> What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    >>>>> do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    >>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>> Federico
    >>>> I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    >>>> the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.
    >>> I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    >>> or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?
    >> The latter.
    > Hmm....you found that method preferable to either installing the
    > proper length BB spindle or placing spacers under the RH cup?
    Obviously. I use shims all the time on various locations on bikes, I
    don't see the problem.

    Quoted message said:

    The problem? A concern about distorting the crankarm/spindle
    interface, making the crankarm more likely to have a problem fitting a
    properly sized spindle at another time.

    Not going to happen.

    Perhaps you're correct; I've only done this (shim on spindle) with
    crankarms already having problems. I'm not inclined to use
    (sacrifice?) a fully functional crankarm to find out.

  15. Ozark Bicycle said:
    Peter Cole said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    On Dec 13, 6:54 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > Ozark Bicycle wrote:
    >> On Dec 12, 7:35 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
    >>>> On Dec 11, 6:21 am, Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>>> [email hidden] wrote:
    >>>>>> Hello all,
    >>>>>> I am building my first bike.
    >>>>>> I bought a BB with a 110mm spindle (square taper) and a new-old-stock
    >>>>>> Shimano FC-M510 crankset. According to the Shimano's specs, this
    >>>>>> should give a 47.5mm chainline.
    >>>>>> My measured chainline is, however, a few mm's shorter. If I remove the
    >>>>>> crank bolts, I can see that the right crank almost mushrooms the
    >>>>>> spindle (2mm left), while the left crank definitely has a few more
    >>>>>> mm's to go.
    >>>>>> So, the diagnosis seems to be that the right crank isn't really
    >>>>>> perfect...
    >>>>>> What should I do? Replace the BB with a 113mm spindle?
    >>>>>> What if I add a tiny shim between the spindle and the crank? Will it
    >>>>>> do the trick or just destroy the crank?
    >>>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>> Federico
    >>>>> I've shimmed the crank, as Sheldon describes, on one bike where I had
    >>>>> the same problem. Worked fine -- lots of miles, big rider.
    >>>> I'm curious: did you shim the crank to make a damaged crankarm usable,
    >>>> or to compensate for a too short BB spindle?
    >>> The latter.
    >> Hmm....you found that method preferable to either installing the
    >> proper length BB spindle or placing spacers under the RH cup?
    > Obviously. I use shims all the time on various locations on bikes, I
    > don't see the problem.
    The problem? A concern about distorting the crankarm/spindle
    interface, making the crankarm more likely to have a problem fitting a
    properly sized spindle at another time.


    Not going to happen.

    Perhaps you're correct;

    I was correct at least once, that's all I needed.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.