becoming a republican

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf

LOL!

This is Great!

Quoted message said:

http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf

Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

-

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=peak+oil&btnG=Google+Search

"You're doin' a heckuva job, Brownie!" - bu$h, a few days
before his FEMA chief, Micheal Brown was forced to resign
because of his gross incomptence.

"The tools that enable Cuba save lives and preserve
human dignity during hurricanes are socialist values
and organization." - Dr. W.T. Whitney Jr

Ever wonder who benefits from the 150 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21

http://www.commondreams.org/
http://www.truthout.org/
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
http://counterpunch.org/
http://responsiblewealth.org/

"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm

"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.

"God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them. And then
he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did."
-- George W. Bush

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the
will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the
Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."
-- Adolf [censored]

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron...

Hank 'stopbu$h'@torture.gov said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf

Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
during the whole war in Iraq.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

JMW said:

Hank 'stopbu$h'@torture.gov said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf

Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
during the whole war in Iraq.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam conflict.

It's okay if we get more careful about throwing away lives.

Dally

Dally said:

JMW said:

Hank 'stopbu$h'@torture.gov said:

[email hidden] wrote:

>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf

Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
during the whole war in Iraq.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hank 'stopbu$h'@torture.gov said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf

Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
during the whole war in Iraq.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

Ohhhh! OK, we can dispose of a few more American lives then. Woooo I feed
better now.

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

Dally said:

JMW said:

Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
>[email hidden] wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
>
> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
during the whole war in Iraq.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

Dally said:

JMW wrote:
> Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
>>[email hidden] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
>>
>> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
>
>
> In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
> majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
> in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
> during the whole war in Iraq.
>
> Just thought I'd share that with you.

And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?

What part of "part" did you not understand?

"WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hank 'stopbu$h'@torture.gov said:

[email hidden] wrote:

> http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf

Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
during the whole war in Iraq.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

Ohhhh! OK, we can dispose of a few more American lives then. Woooo I
feed better now.

Maybe AIDS will get a few more.

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

Dally said:

JMW wrote:

>Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
>
>>[email hidden] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
>>
>>Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
>
>
>In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
>majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
>in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
>during the whole war in Iraq.
>
>Just thought I'd share that with you.

And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?

The big businesses depending on slave labor wanted to keep their slaves,
but the Southern people dying at Gettysburg were fighting out of
patriotism harnassed to the benefit of the big slave-dependent businesses.

You can pretend a war isn't about economic interests if you wave enough
flags.

HTH

Dally

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

Dally said:

JMW wrote:

>Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
>
>>[email hidden] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
>>
>>Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
>
>
>In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
>majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
>in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
>during the whole war in Iraq.
>
>Just thought I'd share that with you.

And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?

The big businesses depending on slave labor wanted to keep their slaves,
but the Southern people dying at Gettysburg were fighting out of
patriotism harnassed to the benefit of the big slave-dependent businesses.

You can pretend a war isn't about economic interests if you wave enough
flags.

HTH

Dally

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:

>[email hidden] wrote:
>
>
>> http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
>
> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!

In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
during the whole war in Iraq.

Just thought I'd share that with you.

Ohhhh! OK, we can dispose of a few more American lives then. Woooo I
feed better now.

Maybe AIDS will get a few more.

You're a sick man. I do hope that you think of the things that you say.
Concentrate on them and think about the hate within your speech and thought.

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

Dally said:

JMW wrote:
> Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
>>[email hidden] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
>>
>> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
>
>
> In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
> majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops
> died
> in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
> during the whole war in Iraq.
>
> Just thought I'd share that with you.

And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam
conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?
--
Om.

Yup, Lincoln had no problem with the territorial states having slavery.

"WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

Dally wrote:
> JMW wrote:
> > Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
> >>[email hidden] wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
> >>
> >> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
> >
> >
> > In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
> > majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops
> > died
> > in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
> > during the whole war in Iraq.
> >
> > Just thought I'd share that with you.
>
> And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
> Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam
> conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?

No, Om you are right. Lincoln had this new weapon - a Gatling gun that he
was keen to try out in a war - just to see how well it worked in combat
conditions. So he invented the slavery issue to get the South to get [censored]
and start the civil war. France was too far away and he couldn't be bothered
with Canada. It wasn;t slavery that was the issue you are right

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

Dally wrote:
> JMW wrote:
> > Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
> >>[email hidden] wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
> >>
> >> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
> >
> >
> > In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
> > majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
> > in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
> > during the whole war in Iraq.
> >
> > Just thought I'd share that with you.
>
> And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
> Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam
> conflict.

Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
slaves.

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?

What part of "part" did you not understand?

Missed that "part".

Mea Culpa. ;-)
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

In article <[email hidden]>,

David said:

"WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:

> Dally wrote:
> > JMW wrote:
> > > Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
> > >>[email hidden] wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
> > >>
> > >> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
> > > majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops
> > > died
> > > in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
> > > during the whole war in Iraq.
> > >
> > > Just thought I'd share that with you.
> >
> > And in 1863 under a Republican president there were more casualties at
> > Gettysburg, PA in four days than there were in the entire Vietnam
> > conflict.
>
> Part of that was because Democrats wanted to keep African-Americans as
> slaves.
>

I thought it was determined that the civil war really was not all about
slavery?

No, Om you are right. Lincoln had this new weapon - a Gatling gun that he
was keen to try out in a war - just to see how well it worked in combat
conditions. So he invented the slavery issue to get the South to get [censored]
and start the civil war. France was too far away and he couldn't be bothered
with Canada. It wasn;t slavery that was the issue you are right

Bigger, better weapons we need to show off with?
Are you saying that is what the mid-east war is about too? ;-)

Bush and his genital prosthesis?

<tongue lodged firmly in cheek here.....>
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

"WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Hank <"stopbu$h"@torture.gov> wrote:
>
>>[email hidden] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
>>
>> Entertaining and accurate link. Thanks!
>
> In 1968, under a Democratic president, and with strong Democratic
> majorities in both the House and the Senate, more American troops died
> in Vietnam during the first two months of that year than have died
> during the whole war in Iraq.
>
> Just thought I'd share that with you.

Ohhhh! OK, we can dispose of a few more American lives then. Woooo I
feed better now.

Maybe AIDS will get a few more.

You're a sick man. I do hope that you think of the things that you say.
Concentrate on them and think about the hate within your speech and

thought.

The only innocent people that get AIDS are the blood transfusion ones. And
if the [censored] would get their head straightened out and the junkies would off
themselves, we wouldn't have the issue of normal people getting it.

John said:

The only innocent people that get AIDS are the blood transfusion ones. And
if the [censored] would get their head straightened out and the junkies would off
themselves, we wouldn't have the issue of normal people getting it.

So those little newborns are evil [censored] too?

"TheBillRodgers!" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

John said:

The only innocent people that get AIDS are the blood transfusion ones.

And

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

if the [censored] would get their head straightened out and the junkies would

off

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

themselves, we wouldn't have the issue of normal people getting it.

So those little newborns are evil [censored] too?

If they're [censored], they're evil.