Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

beginner racing bike

Started by Ron Bott · · Last activity · 22 posts · 578 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
3 July 2004
Last activity
7 July 2004
Original author
Ron Bott
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
578
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I would like to return to some road racing after a layoff of about 10
    years. While recently looking at some equipment, I felt a bit
    overwhelmed by the options, variety, as well as the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike with a
    Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus components. I guess the
    thought was the bike would be reasonably priced, perform well, but not
    be overly expensive to replace parts, etc. when the eminent crashes of
    beginner racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always preferred
    the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in the heirachy that
    would be recommended for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry level racing
    setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would like a nice, solid bike,
    but it needn't be overly extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that
    would matter for frame slection materials.

    Thanks in advance-
    Ron Bott

  2. "Ron Bott" wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today?

    Things are not much different in terms of longevity, although alu frames
    have expanded their influence into some of the most expensive frames you can
    buy. Consider getting a used bike, maybe from e-bay or
    rec.bicycles.marketplace where you can get more bike for your buck. If you
    prefer new, and are price conscious you will more than likely end up with an
    aluminum bike, but good steel can be had. Even titanium, from r.b.r's own
    Mark Hickey: http://www.habcycles.com/road.html

    Quoted message said:

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always preferred
    the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in the heirachy that
    would be recommended for racing?

    I'm partial to Campy Chorus too, although Shimano is less expensive often
    more easily available. You can look over Campy components here:
    http://www.campagnolo.com/newprodc.php They market CENTAUR as their
    "groupset introducing the hi-end of the Campagnolo range."

    Quoted message said:

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry level racing
    setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would like a nice, solid bike,
    but it needn't be overly extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that
    would matter for frame slection materials.

    For starters you might look at
    Gunnar (esp. for good, inexpensive steel):
    http://www.waterfordbikes.com/gunnar/data/index.htm

    Giant: http://www.giant-bicycle.com/default_200406.asp

    Raleigh: http://www.raleighusa.com/

  3. Ron Bott said:

    I would like to return to some road racing after a layoff of about 10
    years. While recently looking at some equipment, I felt a bit
    overwhelmed by the options, variety, as well as the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike with a
    Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus components. I guess the
    thought was the bike would be reasonably priced, perform well, but not
    be overly expensive to replace parts, etc. when the eminent crashes of
    beginner racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always preferred
    the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in the heirachy that
    would be recommended for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry level racing
    setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would like a nice, solid bike,
    but it needn't be overly extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that
    would matter for frame slection materials.

    Beginner? The beginners I know use Tiagra if they're lucky!

    Most basic frames are alu these days, and the fat tubes prevent the
    metal fatiguing as quickly as the old Vitus ones.

    I would try and get 10-speed Campag if possible, as that's what everyone
    else will be using and it's filtering down to the lower groups each year.

  4. Ron Bott said:

    I would like to return to some road racing after a layoff of about 10
    years. While recently looking at some equipment, I felt a bit
    overwhelmed by the options, variety, as well as the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike with a
    Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus components. I guess the
    thought was the bike would be reasonably priced, perform well, but not
    be overly expensive to replace parts, etc. when the eminent crashes of
    beginner racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always preferred
    the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in the heirachy that
    would be recommended for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry level racing
    setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would like a nice, solid bike,
    but it needn't be overly extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that
    would matter for frame slection materials.


    The conservative choice would still be a good steel race
    frame with Campagnolo Centaur at about $1500 &up or with
    Chorus at $2300 &up, custom built with handbuilt wheels and
    race quality peripherals, tubs or clinchers.

    Factory bikes will generally be a little less but then
    you'll need to negotiate parts swaps with the dealer to get
    the exact setup you desire.

    Neither steel or aluminum are altogether better or worse,
    there being a range of materials, techniques, designs and
    quality control ( Or lack thereof) in both.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  5. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
    says...

    Quoted message said:


    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today?

    All aluminum frames will eventually fail. The test is how long it will
    be before they fail. When a German magazine did a tes on frames a
    Cannondale was one of the frames they could not break. How the frame
    is built is more important than the material.

    Quoted message said:

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always preferred
    the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in the heirachy that
    would be recommended for racing?

    Veloce is nice stuff.

    Quoted message said:

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry level racing
    setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would like a nice, solid bike,
    but it needn't be overly extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that
    would matter for frame slection materials.

    I would look at an inexpensice aluminum frame that fits well. I don't see
    you getting much extra with the mondo dollar aluminum frames.
    -----------
    Alex

  6. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
    says...

    Quoted message said:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today?

    One more thing. I remember the Vitus frames and I never heard of any of
    them having fatigue failures. I heard of many bond failues, these frames
    were bonded. I owned one for more than 15k miles and I never had any problems
    with the frame. I kinda wish I had kept that bike.
    -------------
    Alex

  7. Campy Shampy.... I'm a DA guy, but you can get a sweet bike with
    Ultegra that will treat you just fine. If you haven't ridden or
    researched a Cannondale bike, I would highy recommend starting there.
    Their stock alu CAD7 frames come race ready(with components choices
    galore). As always, don't take my/anyone elses word for it, try a
    handful of bikes (fitted properly of course) then figure it out
    yourself.

    Oh yeah, you might want to try saddling a Cannondale (like a
    low/mid-priced R1000) first, it will save you time and money 🙂...

    Take a peek below if ya feel urge...

    Scottt

    http://www.cannondale.com/bikes/04/cusa/model-4RR1D.html

    A Muzi <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Ron Bott said:

    I would like to return to some road racing after a layoff of about 10
    years. While recently looking at some equipment, I felt a bit
    overwhelmed by the options, variety, as well as the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike with a
    Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus components. I guess the
    thought was the bike would be reasonably priced, perform well, but not
    be overly expensive to replace parts, etc. when the eminent crashes of
    beginner racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always preferred
    the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in the heirachy that
    would be recommended for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry level racing
    setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would like a nice, solid bike,
    but it needn't be overly extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that
    would matter for frame slection materials.


    The conservative choice would still be a good steel race
    frame with Campagnolo Centaur at about $1500 &up or with
    Chorus at $2300 &up, custom built with handbuilt wheels and
    race quality peripherals, tubs or clinchers.

    Factory bikes will generally be a little less but then
    you'll need to negotiate parts swaps with the dealer to get
    the exact setup you desire.

    Neither steel or aluminum are altogether better or worse,
    there being a range of materials, techniques, designs and
    quality control ( Or lack thereof) in both.

  8. ronbott-<< I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only aluminum I
    remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap on those were that the
    aluminum would fatigue over time. Obviously with changes in
    construction, materials, etc. things are different today? >><BR><BR>

    Aluminum is cheap and easy to manufacture, hence a lot of aluminum. An aluminum
    frameset can work for you, a stoopid light one will not last.

    ronbott-<< I always preferred
    the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in the heirachy that
    would be recommended for racing? >><BR><BR>

    Any group will 'work for racing'. Gruppos won't make you faster or slower. Find
    a bike shop that can make up a package for you. Like less expensive things that
    may get broken in crashes, like rear ders. Spend the $ on the frameset and te
    wheels. The rest is not important .

    Go to a bike shop that will do a fit on you, on a fit cycle. Then pick a
    frameset and then build the bike specifically the way you want it. Fit is more
    important than anything. Stay away from bike shops that do the 'stand over,
    ride around the paring lot' type fit.

    I'd say a well fitting aluminum or steel frameset, Veloce or Mirage or a mix,
    or Centaur for a wee biot less weight but identical performance. Ideally a good
    wheel builder will build your wheels, not just somebody taking smething outta a
    box.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  9. Jim-<< I'm partial to Campy Chorus too, although Shimano is less expensive
    often
    more easily available. >><BR><BR>

    Don't get the first part of this. Chorus is cheaper than 10s DA, Centaur is
    certainly going to be less than 10s ultegra.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  10. "Qui si parla Campagnolo " wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    Don't get the first part of this. Chorus is cheaper than 10s DA, Centaur


    is

    Quoted message said:

    certainly going to be less than 10s ultegra.

    I was just thinking Record ($1689.00) to DA ($1289.00), Chorus ($1229.00) to
    Ultegra ($659.00) as a top-of-the-line to top-, second-to-second comparison.
    So Chorus is cheaper than DA but more expensive than Ultegra. Never mind
    that in your and my opinion the Chorus is a far better groupset than the
    Ultegra. Prices are from Colorado Cyclist just to use a ready online
    reference. Groups are full groups with the same list of components
    included.

    JF

  11. Jim-<< I was just thinking Record ($1689.00) to DA ($1289.00), Chorus
    ($1229.00) to
    Ultegra ($659.00) as a top-of-the-line to top-, second-to-second comparison.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Here we go...ya know a Ford Crown Victoria is way less than a Mercedes 500
    SEL..both top of the line.

    I think ya gotta look at materials, not heirarchy. It was simplier when Chorus
    was all aluminum, now with carbon, a bit tougher. BUT I compare DA 10s with
    Chorus still, Centaur with ultegra. Titanium, of which there is about what a
    'ti bolt kit' from SRP offered now in 2004 Record(17 'bits), makes for the
    price of Record.

    BTW-I doubt you will find DA 10s, WITH hubs for less than about $1600.

    Must compare with hubs, as DA 10s hubs are so expensive.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  12. "Qui si parla Campagnolo " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Jim-<< I was just thinking Record ($1689.00) to DA ($1289.00), Chorus
    ($1229.00) to
    Ultegra ($659.00) as a top-of-the-line to top-, second-to-second


    comparison.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Here we go...ya know a Ford Crown Victoria is way less than a Mercedes 500
    SEL..both top of the line.

    I think ya gotta look at materials, not heirarchy. It was simplier when


    Chorus

    Quoted message said:

    was all aluminum, now with carbon, a bit tougher. BUT I compare DA 10s


    with

    Quoted message said:

    Chorus still, Centaur with ultegra. Titanium, of which there is about what


    a

    Quoted message said:

    'ti bolt kit' from SRP offered now in 2004 Record(17 'bits), makes for the
    price of Record.

    BTW-I doubt you will find DA 10s, WITH hubs for less than about $1600.

    Must compare with hubs, as DA 10s hubs are so expensive.


    On the other hand, at the price of $1600 for the group, with hubs, DA 10 is
    *priced* to match Record 10, not Chorus or Centaur. The other thing to look
    at in comparing DA 10 to Record 10 is weight. For that same $1600, DA 10 is
    "lighter" than Record 10. Add in the fact that DA 10 appears to be in short
    supply, real or not, plus all the fact that it is the *group to get* as all
    the pros ride it - thus increasing demand, and well, you may want to believe
    that DA 10 is "equivalent" to Chorus or Centaur, but the reality of price,
    weight and desireability makes it closer match to Record....

  13. Alex Rodriguez said:

    All aluminum frames will eventually fail. The test is how long it will
    be before they fail. When a German magazine did a tes on frames a
    Cannondale was one of the frames they could not break. How the frame
    is built is more important than the material.

    Every time the 'Tour' (iirc) magazine article is mentioned, I feel a
    need to remind everyone that they had to make certain compromises to
    the testing regime - namely they were forced to use a high stress /
    short time accelerated life testing approach, rather than the MUCH
    more expensive and time-consuming (but more realistic) "same stress -
    same time" approach.

    The tour test would be appropriate if the bike were to be ridden by an
    800 pound gorilla with a great sprint, though... ;-)

    (suddenly it occurs to me how cool it would be to train an 800 pound
    gorilla to ride a bike and put him up against Cipo in an exibition
    race).

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $695 ti frame

  14. On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:24:16 -0700, Mark Hickey <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Alex Rodriguez said:

    All aluminum frames will eventually fail. The test is how long it will
    be before they fail. When a German magazine did a tes on frames a
    Cannondale was one of the frames they could not break. How the frame
    is built is more important than the material.

    Every time the 'Tour' (iirc) magazine article is mentioned, I feel a
    need to remind everyone that they had to make certain compromises to
    the testing regime - namely they were forced to use a high stress /

    Careful -- surely you mean load, not stress, right?

    Quoted message said:

    short time accelerated life testing approach, rather than the MUCH
    more expensive and time-consuming (but more realistic) "same stress -
    same time" approach.

    The tour test would be appropriate if the bike were to be ridden by an
    800 pound gorilla with a great sprint, though... ;-)

    (suddenly it occurs to me how cool it would be to train an 800 pound
    gorilla to ride a bike and put him up against Cipo in an exibition
    race).

    Now that would be a fine sight to see! But what outfits would they
    wear?!? We'd have to enforce strict regulations to ensure Cipo didn't
    dress up as a gorilla or something. ;-)

  15. Quoted message said:

    I would look at an inexpensice aluminum frame that fits well. I don't see
    you getting much extra with the mondo dollar aluminum frames.

    Try Cervelo Team Soloist. www.cervelo.com

  16. Mark Hickey said:


    The tour test would be appropriate if the bike were to be ridden by an
    800 pound gorilla with a great sprint, though... ;-)

    (suddenly it occurs to me how cool it would be to train an 800 pound
    gorilla to ride a bike and put him up against Cipo in an exibition
    race).

    Would the gorilla shave his legs?

    -=Dave=-

  17. Mark-<< namely they were forced to use a high stress /
    short time accelerated life testing approach, rather than the MUCH
    more expensive and time-consuming (but more realistic) "same stress -
    same time" approach. >><BR><BR>
    << The tour test would be appropriate if the bike were to be ridden by an
    800 pound gorilla with a great sprint, though... ;-) >><BR><BR>

    well said mark. Same goes for crank/BB 'stiffness' testing as well as wind
    tunnel tersting of bike parts, W/O a rider on the bike. How to 'decieve' with
    numbers.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  18. BFD-<< On the other hand, at the price of $1600 for the group, with hubs, DA 10
    is
    *priced* to match Record 10, not Chorus or Centaur. >><BR><BR>

    Well, also remember that mailorder does not a 'standard' make. We price DA and
    Chorus very closely together, including hubs. Samo for ultegra(altho we really
    can't get it now) with centaur, Veloce with 105.

    BFD<< For that same $1600, DA 10 is
    "lighter" than Record 10. >><BR><BR>

    Not so, per the Velonews article of the groups. DA 10s and Chorus 10s are about
    the same.

    BFD-<< Add in the fact that DA 10 appears to be in short
    supply, real or not, >><BR><BR>

    You can say that again. We cannot find 10s cogsets.

    BFD<< Chorus or Centaur, but the reality of price,
    weight and desireability makes it closer match to Record.... >><BR><BR>

    Here in the republic, we sell 20-25 Record groups PLUS 15-20 Chorus groups for
    one DA 10s group. OEM, from Specialized, Giany, Trek, does not a standard make
    either.

    BFD-<< all the fact that it is the *group to get* as all
    the pros ride it >><BR><BR>

    TdF has more Campag teams than shimano PLUS, like Dean and some other bike
    stuff(ksyriums), giving it away for free or 'bro' deals skews the appearance of
    what actually 'sells'.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  19. [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo ) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    BFD-<< On the other hand, at the price of $1600 for the group, with hubs, DA 10
    is
    *priced* to match Record 10, not Chorus or Centaur. >><BR><BR>

    Well, also remember that mailorder does not a 'standard' make. We price DA and
    Chorus very closely together, including hubs. Samo for ultegra(altho we really
    can't get it now) with centaur, Veloce with 105.


    My LBS sells the DA 10 group for $1600. How much do you sell your DA
    10 group for? Less than $1600?

    Quoted message said:

    BFD<< For that same $1600, DA 10 is
    "lighter" than Record 10. >><BR><BR>

    Not so, per the Velonews article of the groups. DA 10s and Chorus 10s are about
    the same.


    Actually, according to the "official" websites, Record is the lightest
    of the 3 groups mentioned. Record 10 group (no pedals or headset)
    weighs in at 2671g, DA 10 group weighs 2696g and Chorus 10 group
    weighs 2836. I would say its more like DA 10 and Record 10 are "about
    the same"....

    Quoted message said:

    BFD-<< Add in the fact that DA 10 appears to be in short
    supply, real or not, >><BR><BR>

    You can say that again. We cannot find 10s cogsets.

    BFD<< Chorus or Centaur, but the reality of price,
    weight and desireability makes it closer match to Record.... >><BR><BR>

    Here in the republic, we sell 20-25 Record groups PLUS 15-20 Chorus groups for
    one DA 10s group. OEM, from Specialized, Giany, Trek, does not a standard make
    either.


    Since you appears to be selling so much more Campy 10 than DA 10, how
    much are you selling these groups for?

    Quoted message said:

    BFD-<< all the fact that it is the *group to get* as all
    the pros ride it >><BR><BR>

    TdF has more Campag teams than shimano PLUS, like Dean and some other bike
    stuff(ksyriums), giving it away for free or 'bro' deals skews the appearance of
    what actually 'sells'.


    Agree, OEM gets the best deal and can "package" a group in a
    *complete* bike for way less than what you, the shops, can get it for.
    That's how mail-order has survived all these years.....

  20. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    ...
    Here in the republic, we sell 20-25 Record groups PLUS 15-20 Chorus groups for
    one DA 10s group....

    And would you not be promoting Campy over Shimano to your customers, Mr.
    Chisholm? Is not this sample therefore biased?

    --
    Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.