BHIT bill, my MPs response

Discussion in 'UK and Europe' started by Ianb, Feb 12, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ianb

    Ianb Guest

    Hello all, Just had a response form my MP to my BHIT e-mail. She did sign the EDM but appears to
    have revised her opinion in light of further info

    She also tabled a written question (855 for answer 1/12, answered 3/12/03) [DfT ref 0002 03/04]
    Question was about number of cycling (a) fatalities & (b) serious injuries, divided into adult &
    children, the responder was unable to say what proportion were wearing helmets (which does seem
    rather strange to me in view of this debate). for your info and possible use I will attempt to
    reproduce the table below

    2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107
    serious 731 1856 649 1840 572 1694

    --
    IanB

    n.b. as I subscribe to two large newsgroups it may be
    several days before I see a newsgroup response
     
    Tags:


  2. On 12/2/04 9:51 am, in article [email protected],
    "IanB" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Hello all, Just had a response form my MP to my BHIT e-mail. She did sign the EDM but appears to
    > have revised her opinion in light of further info
    >
    This is actually very positive as these figures directly contradict the BHIT version of stats from
    parliaments own mouth.

    > She also tabled a written question (855 for answer 1/12, answered 3/12/03) [DfT ref 0002 03/04]

    ..d
     
  3. Was a bit messed so tidied it up a bit. Hopefully OE won't mess it up again
    when I post it :)

    2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107
    serious 731 1856 649 1840 572 1694

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004
     
  4. Simon Brooke

    Simon Brooke Guest

    "Mark Thompson" <[email protected] (change warm for hot)> writes:

    > Was a bit messed so tidied it up a bit. Hopefully OE won't mess it up again when I post it :)

    Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock it
    up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!

    2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731
    1856 649 1840 572 1694

    --
    [email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
     
  5. > Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock
    > it up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!
    >
    > 2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731 1856 649
    > 1840 572 1694

    Well, each row is on the right line anyway!

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004
     
  6. Paul Lydon

    Paul Lydon Guest

    On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:35:16 GMT, Simon Brooke <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >"Mark Thompson" <[email protected] (change warm for hot)> writes:
    >
    >> Was a bit messed so tidied it up a bit. Hopefully OE won't mess it up again when I post it :)
    >
    >Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock
    >it up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!
    >
    > 2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731
    > 1856 649 1840 572 1694

    Oh well - Agent must have cocked it up!

    --
    Paul Lydon Winster, Derbyshire, UK
     
  7. > it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock it up

    hmmm, I'm running OE......

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.587 / Virus Database: 371 - Release Date: 12/02/2004
     
  8. In article <[email protected]>, Mark Thompson wrote:
    >> Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock
    >> it up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!
    >>
    >> 2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731 1856 649
    >> 1840 572 1694
    >
    >Well, each row is on the right line anyway!

    Simon did say it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock it up. Mark's newreader has
    cocked it up. Mark's headers include X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 So, no
    suprises there then.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...