BHIT bill, my MPs response

Hello all, Just had a response form my MP to my BHIT e-mail. She did sign the EDM but appears to
have revised her opinion in light of further info

She also tabled a written question (855 for answer 1/12, answered 3/12/03) [DfT ref 0002 03/04]
Question was about number of cycling (a) fatalities & (b) serious injuries, divided into adult &
children, the responder was unable to say what proportion were wearing helmets (which does seem
rather strange to me in view of this debate). for your info and possible use I will attempt to
reproduce the table below

2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107
serious 731 1856 649 1840 572 1694

--
IanB

n.b. as I subscribe to two large newsgroups it may be
several days before I see a newsgroup response

 

On 12/2/04 9:51 am, in article [email protected],
"IanB" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello all, Just had a response form my MP to my BHIT e-mail. She did sign the EDM but appears to
> have revised her opinion in light of further info
>
This is actually very positive as these figures directly contradict the BHIT version of stats from
parliaments own mouth.

> She also tabled a written question (855 for answer 1/12, answered 3/12/03) [DfT ref 0002 03/04]

..d

 

Was a bit messed so tidied it up a bit. Hopefully OE won't mess it up again
when I post it

2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107
serious 731 1856 649 1840 572 1694

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004

 

In article <[email protected]>,
IanB <[email protected]> wrote:
>for your info and possible use I will attempt to reproduce the table below
>
Here's the table reformatted so that it doesn't wrap the lines:

2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731
1856 649 1840 572 1694

cheers,

Phil
--
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt

 

"Mark Thompson" <[email protected] (change warm for hot)> writes:

> Was a bit messed so tidied it up a bit. Hopefully OE won't mess it up again when I post it

Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock it
up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!

2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731
1856 649 1840 572 1694

--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

;; Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

 

> Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock
> it up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!
>
> 2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731 1856 649
> 1840 572 1694

Well, each row is on the right line anyway!

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004

 

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:35:16 GMT, Simon Brooke <[email protected]>
wrote:

>"Mark Thompson" <[email protected] (change warm for hot)> writes:
>
>> Was a bit messed so tidied it up a bit. Hopefully OE won't mess it up again when I post it
>
>Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock
>it up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!
>
> 2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731
> 1856 649 1840 572 1694

Oh well - Agent must have cocked it up!

--
Paul Lydon Winster, Derbyshire, UK

 

> it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock it up

hmmm, I'm running OE......

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.587 / Virus Database: 371 - Release Date: 12/02/2004

 

In article <[email protected]>, Mark Thompson wrote:
>> Some hope. Try this, it has hard tabs so it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock
>> it up - the lesson is don't try editing news with 'proportional' fonts!
>>
>> 2000 2001 2002 child adult child adult child adult fatal 27 98 25 111 22 107 serious 731 1856 649
>> 1840 572 1694
>
>Well, each row is on the right line anyway!

Simon did say it would take a pretty stupid text layout engine to cock it up. Mark's newreader has
cocked it up. Mark's headers include X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 So, no
suprises there then.