UK and Europe · Public discussion

Bike Shaped Objects

Started by Tim Hall · · Last activity · 17 posts · 681 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
26 June 2006
Last activity
30 June 2006
Original author
Tim Hall
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
681
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This weekend saw me, two other alleged grown ups and 13 Scouts riding
    from Guildford along the North Downs, then south to Crawley. A Good
    Time Was Had By All. We camped overnight at a Scout site on Box Hill.

    But the bikes! Many of the kids had 99 quid full suspension bike
    shaped objects. This is the first time I've had to study such things
    in detail and they are <preaching to the choir> gob smackingly bad.
    So heavy, almost heavier than the lads riding them. One parent
    proudly told me he'd got two for 99 quid. That's 50 quid a bike, with
    springs at each end. I bit my tongue, it wasn't the time or place for
    a lecture.

    However (hurrah!) the enthusiasm of the kids overcame the quality of
    the bikes. They just kept going, undaunted, and most managed their own
    personal Alpe d'Huez riding up the zig zags to get to the top of Box
    Hill.

    No p*nct*r*s but: One set of loose cones, two saddles too low, one set
    of badly adjusted brakes, one slipping gear cable (this less than a
    mile from the start) and the piece de wossname, a crank that fell off.
    Having been ridden loose for a few miles the hole in the crank was
    shagged, so it got retightened about half a dozen times over the
    weekend. Yes, a bike check before hand would have been a good idea.

    Only 20 miles per day, but they enjoyed it hugely, and were back in
    time to watch a sporting event on the tv.

    Tim

  2. Tim Hall said:


    But the bikes! Many of the kids had 99 quid full suspension bike
    shaped objects. This is the first time I've had to study such things
    in detail and they are <preaching to the choir> gob smackingly bad.
    So heavy, almost heavier than the lads riding them. One parent
    proudly told me he'd got two for 99 quid. That's 50 quid a bike, with
    springs at each end. I bit my tongue, it wasn't the time or place for
    a lecture.

    I bought my 8yo a Kona Hula on ebay, absolutely fantastic. A real bike,
    21 speed, rapidfire, butted aluminium frame, and so light. Bid 127
    pounds, would have paid more. New price is 280. You can get real bikes
    for kids, but they start at about 150-200 without full suspension. The
    24" wheel kona Stab is about 1200, but I think that is of more appeal
    to persons of limited stature, rather than age.

    Quoted message said:

    However (hurrah!) the enthusiasm of the kids overcame the quality of
    the bikes. They just kept going, undaunted, and most managed their own
    personal Alpe d'Huez riding up the zig zags to get to the top of Box
    Hill.

    Keep pumping the chocolate bourbons, 1 per 2-3 miles, followed by
    bananas. Considering bike weight as fraction of body weight, those
    children have to work pretty hard. Think mgh.

    Quoted message said:

    No p*nct*r*s but: One set of loose cones, two saddles too low, one set
    of badly adjusted brakes, one slipping gear cable (this less than a
    mile from the start) and the piece de wossname, a crank that fell off.
    Having been ridden loose for a few miles the hole in the crank was
    shagged, so it got retightened about half a dozen times over the
    weekend. Yes, a bike check before hand would have been a good idea.

    Standard stuff for the kids bikes around my way. I tend to check most
    of the bikes in the road.

    Quoted message said:

    Only 20 miles per day, but they enjoyed it hugely, and were back in
    time to watch a sporting event on the tv.

    Portugal by a headbutt!

    regards,
    daren
    --
    remove outer garment for reply

  3. Tim Hall said:

    This weekend saw me, two other alleged grown ups and 13 Scouts riding

    No p*nct*r*s but: One set of loose cones, two saddles too low

    This surprises me; I'd have expected 15 (!!) saddles to
    be too low.

    I have gone on several 25 mile sponsored rides; I go
    as a "rider/mechanic/helper". At the gathering point I have
    a small kit of tools, 2 track pumps (schrada and presta),
    and some squirt lube.

    For the vast majority of people turning up,

    * I inflate the tyres to the pressure printed
    on the tyre; their tyres are normally at 1/3 to 1/2
    of this pressure when they arrive.

    * I lubricate the chain, which is normally dry going
    on rusty.

    * I raise the saddle by an inch. Possibly more.

    These 3 action are appropriate and required for around
    70% of people (or their bikes), IME, over 5 rides of 50 people a time.

    BugBear

  4. "Tim Hall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    But the bikes! Many of the kids had 99 quid full suspension bike
    shaped objects. This is the first time I've had to study such things
    in detail and they are <preaching to the choir> gob smackingly bad.
    So heavy, almost heavier than the lads riding them. One parent
    proudly told me he'd got two for 99 quid. That's 50 quid a bike, with
    springs at each end. I bit my tongue, it wasn't the time or place for
    a lecture.

    Tim

    But now is a good time to give advice on what parents should do.

    My 8 yr old's Giant is a supposedly reputable make - I tried, not from Argus
    or Halfords but it's still too heavy.
    Economics - a bike that will be outgrown in 2-3 years is not worth designing
    properly as it costs too much. Adding another few dozen gears and suspension
    parts is cheaper and attractive to the children. Is that what happens?
    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!
    Lol

  5. Lol wrote on 27/06/2006 00:13 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!
    Lol

    The Islabikes at the York Rally looked very nice. Well made childrens
    bikes at reasonable prices.

    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  6. Tony Raven said:

    Lol wrote on 27/06/2006 00:13 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!
    Lol

    The Islabikes at the York Rally looked very nice. Well made childrens
    bikes at reasonable prices.

    Definitely 'no frills' - ie no unnecessary extras and well designed
    parts to fit small hands. And the pricing was very competitive. I'm
    definitely considering one for Rachel but she seems to want lots of
    gears.. However the design lends itself to upgrading and uses good
    quality parts.

    They say they offer a buy-back part exchange on their bikes - wonder
    what happens to the used ones?

    ...d

  7. David Martin said:


    Tony Raven said:

    Lol wrote on 27/06/2006 00:13 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!
    Lol

    The Islabikes at the York Rally looked very nice. Well made childrens
    bikes at reasonable prices.

    We've just bought one for our three year old (the Cnoc). He loves it!

    It's well thought out -- the review in the last Velovision was pretty
    spot on, but for those who don't subscribe: you get a coaster brake on
    the back (little legs can push the pedals back easily), plus a proper
    front rim brake (U brake? V brake? One of those where the brake cable
    goes across the top with a noodle) with a nice light action & a
    reach-adjustable brake handle. The handlebars sized for small
    hands. Proper saddle. Nice solid looking frame. All very shiny in
    silver and black.

    Not a *light* bike, but still considerably lighter than the children's
    bikes I looked at in the local bike shops which appeared to be made
    out of cast iron and weighed more than the adult bikes.

    Quoted message said:

    Definitely 'no frills' - ie no unnecessary extras and well designed
    parts to fit small hands. And the pricing was very competitive. I'm
    definitely considering one for Rachel but she seems to want lots of
    gears.. However the design lends itself to upgrading and uses good
    quality parts.

    They say they offer a buy-back part exchange on their bikes - wonder
    what happens to the used ones?

    Since she (Isla that is) has only just started up I doubt there are
    very many used ones yet! Presumably they'll be sold on as second hand
    bikes. You'd probably get more money selling on via ebay though.

    Phil

    --
    http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt

  8. Lol said:


    But now is a good time to give advice on what parents should do.

    My 8 yr old's Giant is a supposedly reputable make - I tried, not from Argus
    or Halfords but it's still too heavy.
    Economics - a bike that will be outgrown in 2-3 years is not worth designing
    properly as it costs too much. Adding another few dozen gears and suspension
    parts is cheaper and attractive to the children. Is that what happens?
    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!
    Lol

    Not so, there are plenty of well-designed bikes, they do however cost.
    We have gone down the following route.

    Began with a 12" Raleigh Bluebell, about thirty years old, solid tyres,
    stabilizers
    moved to a 16" Raleigh Kobo: red, steel, not light but well made
    (UKP80)
    moved to a 20" Trek MT60, silver, light, aluminium, VERY adjustable,
    6speed (UKP180)
    moved to a 24" Kona Hula, green, very light aluminium 21speed (used
    UKP127, new 280)

    Am also considering a 24" road bike (Giant TCR), altough the Kona is so
    light I wonder about the advantages.

    Up to 24" bikes have all lasted 2-3 years. It helps greatly that I have
    two sons, 3yrs apart, so bike handover occurs at the same time. I also
    believe that buying quality will recover more of the cost come resale
    time. All bikes should be in sex-neutral colours as a matter of course.
    Never buy anything branded Action Man\Power Rangers\Barbie\Bratz... as
    the licensing costs would be better spent on useful functional
    components (like V-brakes!).

    For quality 24" bikes; Dawes (Hybrid), Kona (MTB), Trek (MTB and road),
    Giant (MTB and Road), also Specialized. Prices start at about 250. If
    you want something slightly cheaper head to Decathalon. Avoid Halfords,
    but especially avoid Toys-R-Us. Buy quality used over new every time,
    they are harder to find, but I have bought two used Trek MT60's for
    friends and am looking for another!

    We also have a KMX K class, but that is more for fun, again having two
    boys makes the price bearable.

    regards,
    daren
    --
    remove outer garment for reply

  9. Lol wondered:

    Quoted message said:

    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!

    Probably go for an Islabikes, as everyone else seems to have suggested
    so far:
    <url:http://www.islabikes.co.uk/>

    Unless the child in question insists that the bike has to be a certain
    colour (pink, in my case), in which case go for a Puky and just live
    with the extra weight:
    <url:http://www.puky.net/homepage/>

    --
    Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  10. In article <[email hidden]>

    Danny Colyer said:

    Lol wondered:

    Quoted message said:

    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!

    Probably go for an Islabikes, as everyone else seems to have suggested
    so far:
    <url:http://www.islabikes.co.uk/>

    Unless the child in question insists that the bike has to be a certain
    colour (pink, in my case), in which case go for a Puky and just live
    with the extra weight:
    <url:http://www.puky.net/homepage/>


    How hard is it to paint a frame pink?

  11. Lol said:

    "Tim Hall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    But the bikes! Many of the kids had 99 quid full suspension bike
    shaped objects. This is the first time I've had to study such things
    in detail and they are <preaching to the choir> gob smackingly bad.
    So heavy, almost heavier than the lads riding them. One parent
    proudly told me he'd got two for 99 quid. That's 50 quid a bike, with
    springs at each end. I bit my tongue, it wasn't the time or place for
    a lecture.

    Tim

    But now is a good time to give advice on what parents should do.

    My 8 yr old's Giant is a supposedly reputable make - I tried, not from Argus
    or Halfords but it's still too heavy.
    Economics - a bike that will be outgrown in 2-3 years is not worth designing
    properly as it costs too much. Adding another few dozen gears and suspension
    parts is cheaper and attractive to the children. Is that what happens?
    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!
    Lol

    a) Buy decent 2nd hand bikes, ex-shop display or last year's models.

    b) As Daren points out, if you've got more than one child then spend more money on the first bike for the eldest - it'll pay dividends when you pass it on to the next (and the next etc).

    c) Learn bicycle maintenance! Teach it to the kids as they wear their bikes out. A decent bike will be easier to maintain/repair and will last much, much longer. It'll also be nicer/more fun to ride, and maintenance will instil a sense of pride/ownership.

    Basically, I'm suggesting spending a little more. I remember as a kid contributing some of my pocket money to the more expensive presents I received. Made me appreciate the value of the things.

    I recycle bikes for friends and charity. This involves repairing those bikes that are repairable (or worth repairing) and stripping useful parts from those that aren't. I'm constantly appalled at the low quality of the kids bikes I receive - £99 bikes aren't worth recycling and there's little of worth to be taken from them. Generally, they're heavy, the suspensions sucks, the cranks fail and the levers break - cheap [censored] from top to bottom.

    There are exceptions to the [censored] bikes for kids (though not at £99). As well is IslaBikes, I find that Saracen make nice kids bikes and are reasonable value, and Specialized are hard to beat for quality (and cool).

    Wheelist

  12. wheelist said:
    Quoted message said:

    My 8 yr old's Giant is a supposedly reputable make - I tried, not from
    Argus
    or Halfords but it's still too heavy.
    Economics - a bike that will be outgrown in 2-3 years is not worth
    designing
    properly as it costs too much. Adding another few dozen gears and
    suspension
    parts is cheaper and attractive to the children. Is that what happens?
    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!
    Lola) Buy decent 2nd hand bikes, ex-shop display or last year's models.

    b) As Daren points out, if you've got more than one child then spend
    more money on the first bike for the eldest - it'll pay dividends when
    you pass it on to the next (and the next etc).

    Absolutely.. We bought the Raleigh Kobo16 for each of our two. Heavy
    but solid and almost indestructible first bike. A tad overgeared on
    grass but I might be able to remedy that.

    So far they have been passed down a couple of times with no
    modification/maintenance needed. (#2 son has one, second oldest cousin
    has the other.) I envisage them moving on to a few other kids in their
    lifetime. Good value at 90 quid, though now I would get the Cnoc16 from
    Isla as 10 quid either way won't make much difference in teh long term
    but the bike is better.

    Quoted message said:

    c) Learn bicycle maintenance! Teach it to the kids as they wear their
    bikes out. A decent bike will be easier to maintain/repair and will
    last much, much longer. It'll also be nicer/more fun to ride, and
    maintenance will instil a sense of pride/ownership.

    Quoted message said:

    Basically, I'm suggesting spending a little more. I remember as a kid
    contributing some of my pocket money to the more expensive presents I
    received. Made me appreciate the value of the things.

    That is a good idea.. Rachel currently borrows Alan's MTB (Giant MTX
    250, a 24" wheel), though the seat won't quite go high enough (she can
    now start off without having to be sat on the seat). Peter (4.5 yo)
    decided he wanted a go on it and could almost ride it. Maybe I have
    been too pessimistic on size and he should be riding the 20" (now
    looking at the Islabikes for Rachel - just have to decide whether she
    should get road[cross] or mountain, and which size)

    Quoted message said:

    I recycle bikes for friends and charity. This involves repairing those
    bikes that are repairable (or worth repairing) and stripping useful
    parts from those that aren't. I'm constantly appalled at the low
    quality of the kids bikes I receive - £99 bikes aren't worth recycling
    and there's little of worth to be taken from them. Generally, they're
    heavy, the suspensions sucks, the cranks fail and the levers break -
    cheap [censored] from top to bottom.

    Absolutely. Plastic coated steel brakes (to look like decent resin
    brakes), pressed steel brakes, [censored], badly machined hubs. Much can be
    recycled though the 'precision' components (shifters etc.) are usually
    toast.

    Quoted message said:

    There are exceptions to the [censored] bikes for kids (though not at £99). As
    well is IslaBikes, I find that Saracen make nice kids bikes and are
    reasonable value, and Specialized are hard to beat for quality (and
    cool).

    Giant do a good range of reasonable quality bikes. Anyway, I'll
    probably hire/borrow some over the holidays to see what is good, and
    then she'll be up to the Go-Ride club to try some other bits. (I can
    see shoes/cleats on the horizon - she has already asked)

    ...d

  13. Rob Morley said:

    In article <[email hidden]>

    Danny Colyer said:

    Lol wondered:

    Quoted message said:

    What does the enlightened parent do? advice please!


    Probably go for an Islabikes, as everyone else seems to have suggested
    so far:
    <url:http://www.islabikes.co.uk/>

    Unless the child in question insists that the bike has to be a certain
    colour (pink, in my case), in which case go for a Puky and just live
    with the extra weight:
    <url:http://www.puky.net/homepage/>


    How hard is it to paint a frame pink?


    Well for my 7yd we got
    http://www.falconcycles.co.uk/CORP/ShogunJunior/Sabre.html

    she love it and its not to heavy and seams quite tough. She needs the
    suspension as shes on rough tracks 98% of the time!!
    ttfn
    Jane

  14. Rob Morley said:

    How hard is it to paint a frame pink?

    To paint a chrome frame so that it looks as good as a properly powder
    coated frame, without actually getting it powder coated? Nigh on
    impossible, I believe, and I really don't want to have to bother with it.

    I suggested buying an Islabikes and decorating it with the same tape
    that I used on her unicycle, but no, it had to be properly pink.

    --
    Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  15. In article <[email hidden]>

    Danny Colyer said:
    Rob Morley said:

    How hard is it to paint a frame pink?

    To paint a chrome frame

    The Islabikes are alloy.

    Quoted message said:

    so that it looks as good as a properly powder
    coated frame, without actually getting it powder coated?

    Are proper bikes powder coated? We always used stove enamel.

    Quoted message said:

    Nigh on
    impossible, I believe, and I really don't want to have to bother with it.


    You should be able to get reasonable results with acrylic spray paint
    quite easily. But I suppose I'm biased, having been used to spraying
    frames professionally. I did use aerosols to spray the first bike I
    built when I was 14, and that looked quite smart.

    Quoted message said:

    I suggested buying an Islabikes and decorating it with the same tape
    that I used on her unicycle, but no, it had to be properly pink.


    Females are supposed to be less visually motivated than males, but when
    we were looking for bikes for my SO she seemed to care more about the
    paint than the mechanics, and she later insisted on buying a Chopper
    despite me warning her that they don't ride like proper bikes ...

  16. I said:
    Quoted message said:

    To paint a chrome frame

    and Rob Morley responded:

    Quoted message said:

    The Islabikes are alloy.

    Of course, that struck me shortly after posting. Still just as much
    hassle to paint, though. I'd have had to dismantle the bike completely,
    hide all the bits, find time and a location to paint the bike without DD
    seeing it, somewhere where it could also be left to dry without her
    seeing it, and the chances are the result would still be disappointing.
    Besides, she *loves* the flag on the Puky :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Are proper bikes powder coated? We always used stove enamel.

    Dunno. I thought powder coating was usual.

    Quoted message said:

    You should be able to get reasonable results with acrylic spray paint
    quite easily. But I suppose I'm biased, having been used to spraying
    frames professionally. I did use aerosols to spray the first bike I
    built when I was 14, and that looked quite smart.

    I got reasonable results spraying DW's mudguards and pedals purple, but
    not good enough that I'd be happy moving on to a frame. I didn't get
    particularly good results spraying my Muni rim red, which would tend to
    put me off.

    Quoted message said:

    Females are supposed to be less visually motivated than males,

    Maybe when choosing a partner, but for anything else? Surely not.

    --
    Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  17. Rob Morley said:

    Are proper bikes powder coated? We always used stove enamel.

    ..

    Stove enamelling is a popular finish here in the UK, but less so elsewhere, so you'll tend to find resprays are mostly enamelling whilst new bikes are generally powder coated.

    Pretty much the only difference is that the powder is applied dry (electrostatically) whereas enamel is sprayed on wet.

    Both process involve heating in an oven to fix the finish, and both are tougher than standard spray paint.

    It's possible to get a nice enough finish with car spray paint though. Just makesure the frame is clean, put a few coats on (sanding finely between coats) and a lacquer to finish.

    Wheelist

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.