UK and Europe · Public discussion

Blatent Plug (sorry)

Started by Nathaniel Porte · · Last activity · 49 posts · 2,089 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
8 June 2003
Last activity
14 June 2003
Original author
Nathaniel Porte
Posts
49
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,089
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–49 of 49
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Adrian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    James Hodson ([email hidden]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
    were saying :

    Quoted message said:

    Whatever. I am not premitted to drive because of a medical condition. I use a bicycle

    May I ask what medical condition makes you unable to use one form of road transport, yet leaves
    you in a condition to safely operate another, more strenuous, form of road transport?

    More than one. I have an entirely unrelated condition to James, and for a few weeks had no driving
    licence. Cycling was fine though.

    In both cases, I think the reasoning is down to the amount of damage one may cause by losing control
    of one's vehicle.

    I'll never be allowed to drive big lorries or planes...

    cheers, clive

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    James Hodson ([email hidden]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
    were saying :

    Quoted message said:

    Whatever. I am not premitted to drive because of a medical condition. I use a bicycle

    May I ask what medical condition makes you unable to use one form of road transport, yet leaves
    you in a condition to safely operate another, more strenuous, form of road transport?

    Epilepsy, or unexplained fit. When I was in hospital for appendicitis, I was taken off the
    anaesthetic too quickly, and had some form of seizure (I don't react well to an awful lot of
    anaesthetics - the normal ones dentists use don't work at all, just give me pins and needles!).

    I had to have an EKG, and only after a, er, brain-doctor-person (what the hell are they called?)
    took a look at them, and said there were no abnormal patterns, was I sure that I could keep on
    driving. If there'd been abnormal ones, they'd have written to the DVLA and had my license
    cancelled.

    I'd have been able to ride a bike, but not drive a car.

    Pete.

    --
    NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you Remove the news and underscore
    from my address to reply by mail

  3. Pete Smith ([email hidden]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Whatever. I am not premitted to drive because of a medical condition. I use a bicycle

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    May I ask what medical condition makes you unable to use one form of road transport, yet leaves
    you in a condition to safely operate another, more strenuous, form of road transport?

    Quoted message said:

    Epilepsy, or unexplained fit.

    I had to have an EKG, and only after a, er, brain-doctor-person (what the hell are they called?)

    Did you mean EEG? Neuro-physician - or at least, it was on Monday when I took the F-i-L for an EEG.

    Quoted message said:

    took a look at them, and said there were no abnormal patterns, was I sure that I could keep on
    driving. If there'd been abnormal ones, they'd have written to the DVLA and had my license
    cancelled.

    Isn't there something like a "clean" year after the last fit required, in order to be allowed to
    drive? It certainly was when a mate had a bout of epilepsy a year or two ago.

    Quoted message said:

    I'd have been able to ride a bike, but not drive a car.

    You'd be allowed to. You're allowed to ride a bicycle, legally, if blind. The risk of having an
    epileptic fit, though, while cycling is surely exactly the same (assuming it's not made worse by the
    exertion) as while driving? Sure, the consequences will probably be less serious for third parties -
    but they'll probably be more serious for you.

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Pete Smith ([email hidden]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Whatever. I am not premitted to drive because of a medical condition. I use a bicycle

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    May I ask what medical condition makes you unable to use one form of road transport, yet leaves
    you in a condition to safely operate another, more strenuous, form of road transport?

    Quoted message said:

    Epilepsy, or unexplained fit.

    I had to have an EKG, and only after a, er, brain-doctor-person (what the hell are they called?)

    Did you mean EEG? Neuro-physician - or at least, it was on Monday when I took the F-i-L
    for an EEG.

    Yes, sorry. I'm sure there's a special term for head doctors though. Like a Cardiologist looks
    after hearts.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    took a look at them, and said there were no abnormal patterns, was I sure that I could keep on
    driving. If there'd been abnormal ones, they'd have written to the DVLA and had my license
    cancelled.

    Isn't there something like a "clean" year after the last fit required, in order to be allowed to
    drive? It certainly was when a mate had a bout of epilepsy a year or two ago.

    Normally, yes. In my case, my EEG came up OK, and it is a known side- effect of being taken off this
    particular anaesthetic too quickly, so they said there wasn't a problem.

    Pete.

    --
    NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you Remove the news and underscore
    from my address to reply by mail

  5. Pete Smith ([email hidden]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure there's a special term for head doctors though. Like a Cardiologist looks after hearts.

    Yep, a Neuro-Physiologist. At least, it was certainly the Neuro-Physiology dept we were in,
    according to the appointment letter, the signs, and the staff's badges....

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Pete Smith ([email hidden]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure there's a special term for head doctors though. Like a Cardiologist looks after hearts.

    Yep, a Neuro-Physiologist. At least, it was certainly the Neuro-Physiology dept we were in,
    according to the appointment letter, the signs, and the staff's badges....

    Perhaps _they_ forgot the word for head-doctor, and made something up :-p

    Pete.

    --
    NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you Remove the news and underscore
    from my address to reply by mail

  7. Pete Smith ([email hidden]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure there's a special term for head doctors though. Like a Cardiologist looks after
    hearts.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yep, a Neuro-Physiologist. At least, it was certainly the Neuro-Physiology dept we were in,
    according to the appointment letter, the signs, and the staff's badges....

    Quoted message said:

    Perhaps _they_ forgot the word for head-doctor, and made something up
    :-p

    It *was* Luton hospital. Nothing would surprise me.

  8. Firstly, sorry for the delay in replying.

    "Nick Finnigan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Nathaniel Porter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Nick Finnigan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Nathaniel Porter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > "Nick Finnigan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > "]news:[email hidden]...
    > >
    > > How would you define 'much less congested', and what
    > > benefits would that have for town centre shoppers (say)?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That is still traffic into the town centre.

    Yes, but traffic which is easier to accomodate in Britains towns.

    Quoted message said:

    Using bikes instead of a car increases traffic.

    Not in terms of space require it doesn't

    So 'much less congested' means 'half as many cars' ?

    Bikes and pedestirans (and to a lesser extent busses) take up less footprint than cars when occupied
    fully. More people needn't mean more congestion.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So a 3 mile walk+bus journey into Coventry off peak would
    take roughly how long door-to-door, compared with a car?

    From where?

    If it matters, Westwood Heath.

    So you're maybe 30 seconds further away form Coventry than I am. It'd take you at most 50 minutes to
    walk to Coventry CC - by car it'd take a good half hour by car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If off-peak journeys into a by-passed town centre are congested, doesn't that mean they are
    attractive?

    All it means is that people are driving through the town.

    Why are people driving through a by-passed town cenre if not commuting to and from work?

    To get into the town centre shopping, for a start.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It doesn't mean they're stopping and spending money. Many do - many do not, and those


    who

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    don't make shopping less attractive for those who do.

    So we should only go into a town centre to spend money?

    No, but people who drive (and indeed walk, cycle, take the train etc.) through town without shopping
    there are taking a service provided by that town without returning anything, which is unfair if it
    is unecessary.

  9. "Nathaniel Porter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Nick Finnigan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > > How would you define 'much less congested', and what
    > > > benefits would that have for town centre shoppers (say)?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > So a 3 mile walk+bus journey into Coventry off peak would
    > take roughly how long door-to-door, compared with a car?

    If it matters, Westwood Heath.

    So you're maybe 30 seconds further away form Coventry than I am. It'd take you at most 50 minutes
    to walk to Coventry CC - by car it'd take a good half hour by car.

    No, I am nowhere near Coventry, I am just using it as an example to see what travel benefits you
    think residents would have from much less congestion. It seems they would be able to walk at
    3.6mph, rather than having to walk at 3.6mph or drive at 6mph. Any claims that the average vehicle
    speed in the West Midlands is 20mph might be fictional..

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.