Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Blocking

Started by RS · · Last activity · 26 posts · 989 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
15 July 2007
Last activity
23 July 2007
Original author
RS
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
989
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

  2. RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.


    Not sure about that reader, but I use ThunderBird which lets you filter
    by senders address. It's free.

  3. RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

    Dear RS,

    You're not likely to find much about WinWin, so a new program may be
    worth a try. Search for killfile on this page:

    http://www.newsreaders.com/win/clients.html

    Here's a thread from January about Windows newsreaders:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/8fcc382928b55ef1/61324650bd9e37f4?lnk=gst&q=talk+is+cheap+carl&rnum=1#61324650bd9e37f4

    or http://tinyurl.com/2qfrf5

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  4. Quoted message said:
    RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

    Dear RS,

    You're not likely to find much about WinWin, so a new program may be
    worth a try. Search for killfile on this page:

    http://www.newsreaders.com/win/clients.html

    Here's a thread from January about Windows newsreaders:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/8fcc382928b55ef1/61324650bd9e37f4?lnk=gst&q=talk+is+cheap+carl&rnum=1#61324650bd9e37f4

    or http://tinyurl.com/2qfrf5

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Aaargh! Another typo! WinVin, not WinWin.

    CF

  5. RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

    Another vote for Thunderbird. You can block senders and subjects. Not
    too terribly sophisticated, but if you take the time to maintain it a
    little as needed, it works fine.

  6. RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

    Problem with blocking, kill files, etc is that it does not block
    replies to undesirable person, which usually quote him/her. I find it
    easier to just not read what I don't want to. So, someone like Carl,
    who is one of the nicest guys in the group (he prefaces everything
    with "dear" and finishes with "love"😉 may be replying to someone
    completely obnoxious and you end up seeing the post of the unwanted
    person.

    Andres

  7. Quoted message said:
    RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

    Problem with blocking, kill files, etc is that it does not block
    replies to undesirable person, which usually quote him/her.

    A bit of kill-file-fu fixes that, with rules governing message bodies.

    I'm using pan, by the way, which is brilliant for *nix systems running X.
    My second choice would be slrn, which is surprisingly efficient.

    --
    Luigi de Guzman
    http://ouij.livejournal.com

  8. catzz66 said:
    RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

    Another vote for Thunderbird....

    [This message posted with Thunderbird]

    Thunderbird's interface and graphics are practically the same as
    Netscape Communicator 4.x through 7.x, so it is the logical upgrade for
    old Netscape users.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  9. [email hidden] wrote (in part):

    Quoted message said:

    ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...

    Andres

    He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    addressing a slightly confused child.

    Now, that's not to say I'm not an opinionated ass but I like to think
    I am somewhat 'nicer' than the lowest common denominator, or, as he is
    otherwise known, Bill Sornson.

    D'ohBoy, who felt so long as we were opining about others.....

  10. Luigi de Guzman said:
    Quoted message said:
    RS said:

    I'm using WinVin newsreader. Does anyone know if its possible to
    configure this to block a particular poster on this group? Most of us
    seem interested in Bikes and related technical issues. A very few are
    not.

    Problem with blocking, kill files, etc is that it does not block
    replies to undesirable person, which usually quote him/her.

    A bit of kill-file-fu fixes that, with rules governing message bodies.

    I'm using pan, by the way, which is brilliant for *nix systems running X.
    My second choice would be slrn, which is surprisingly efficient.


    Both of those newsreaders are available for windows. Check
    http://pan.rebelbase.com/download/. Most windows users would probably
    prefer pan. I use slrn, because run in a transparent beryl gnome
    terminal I can still read applications beneath my newsreader. It's at
    http://slrn.org/.

  11. chuck said:

    I use slrn, because run in a transparent beryl gnome
    terminal

    Wow, serious geek-dom!

  12. D'ohBoy said:

    [email hidden] wrote (in part):

    Quoted message said:

    ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...

    Quoted message said:

    Andres

    He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    addressing a slightly confused child.

    Let's call a spade a spade:

    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    or, for the cautious:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)

  13. Ozark Bicycle said:
    D'ohBoy said:

    [email hidden] wrote (in part):

    Quoted message said:

    ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...
    Andres


    He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    addressing a slightly confused child.

    Let's call a spade a spade:

    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    or, for the cautious:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)

    Damn it, I hate having to agree with "Ozark Bicycle". Forwarding private
    emails without the permission of the author is inexcusable.

    I believe that "Dear Carl" still owes me an apology for calling me a liar.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  14. Tom \'Johnny Sunset\' Sherman said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:
    D'ohBoy said:

    [email hidden] wrote (in part):

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...
    > Andres
    He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    addressing a slightly confused child.

    Quoted message said:

    Let's call a spade a spade:

    Quoted message said:

    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    Quoted message said:

    or, for the cautious:

    Quoted message said:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    Quoted message said:

    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)

    Damn it, I hate having to agree with "Ozark Bicycle".

    Suck it up, you'll live. ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Forwarding private
    emails without the permission of the author is inexcusable.

    But being a "gossipy, back-biting busybody" is A-OK with you?

  15. Tom 'Johnny Sunset' Sherman said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:
    D'ohBoy said:

    [email hidden] wrote (in part):

    > ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the
    > group... Andres
    He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    addressing a slightly confused child.

    Let's call a spade a spade:

    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    or, for the cautious:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)

    Damn it, I hate having to agree with "Ozark Bicycle". Forwarding
    private emails without the permission of the author is inexcusable.

    I believe that "Dear Carl" still owes me an apology for calling me a
    liar.

    Don't hold your breath! LOL

    Bill "just ask 'Alan Baggins'" S.

  16. Ozark Bicycle said:
    D'ohBoy said:

    [email hidden] wrote (in part):

    Quoted message said:

    ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...

    Quoted message said:

    Andres

    He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    addressing a slightly confused child.

    Let's call a spade a spade:

    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    or, for the cautious:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)

    Perhaps I haven't been paying enough attention to your screeds, but this
    strikes me as something new. Isn't your usual shtick that Carl and Sheldon
    were partners in crime? Now you're complaining that Carl violated
    Sheldon's rights?

    For what it's worth, I'm sure Carl is really, really remorseful that he
    tried to help you out.

    No harm would have come of any of these private exchanges if they hadn't
    been made public. That was your doing.

  17. Bill Sornson said:
    Tom 'Johnny Sunset' Sherman said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    On Jul 18, 6:12 pm, D'ohBoy <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > [email hidden] wrote (in part):
    >
    >> ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the
    >> group... Andres
    > He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    > (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    > addressing a slightly confused child.
    Let's call a spade a spade:

    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    or, for the cautious:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)


    Damn it, I hate having to agree with "Ozark Bicycle". Forwarding
    private emails without the permission of the author is inexcusable.

    I believe that "Dear Carl" still owes me an apology for calling me a
    liar.

    Don't hold your breath! LOL

    Bill "just ask 'Alan Baggins'" S.

    LOL. Or was it "Alan Braggins"? 😉

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  18. Ozark Bicycle said:
    Tom \'Johnny Sunset\' Sherman said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    On Jul 18, 6:12 pm, D'ohBoy <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > [email hidden] wrote (in part):
    >> ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...
    >> Andres
    > He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    > (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    > addressing a slightly confused child.
    Let's call a spade a spade:
    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8
    or, for the cautious:
    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8
    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)


    Damn it, I hate having to agree with "Ozark Bicycle".

    Suck it up, you'll live. ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Forwarding private
    emails without the permission of the author is inexcusable.

    But being a "gossipy, back-biting busybody" is A-OK with you?

    Dear Ozark Bicycle,

    My omission of specific mention of "gossipy, back-biting busybody" was
    not intended to include those characteristics among acceptable behavior.

    "Smarmy Tom"

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  19. Gary Young said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:
    D'ohBoy said:

    [email hidden] wrote (in part):

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Andres

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    addressing a slightly confused child.

    Quoted message said:

    Let's call a spade a spade:

    Quoted message said:

    http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    Quoted message said:

    or, for the cautious:

    Quoted message said:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8

    Quoted message said:

    (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    forwards private emails to third parties".)

    Perhaps I haven't been paying enough attention to your screeds, but this
    strikes me as something new. Isn't your usual shtick that Carl and Sheldon
    were partners in crime? Now you're complaining that Carl violated
    Sheldon's rights?

    There was yet anonther party involved, the party both St. Sheldon and
    Smarmy Carl *slandered*. It's convenient to forget that, eh, Gary?

    Go get your delicate panties in a wad somewhere else, you bore me.

    Quoted message said:


    For what it's worth, I'm sure Carl is really, really remorseful that he
    tried to help you out.

    Oh, yeah, I'm quite sure he wanted to "help", and not just spread
    gossip and slander......

    Quoted message said:
  20. Tom \'Johnny Sunset\' Sherman said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:
    Tom \'Johnny Sunset\' Sherman said:

    Ozark Bicycle wrote:
    > On Jul 18, 6:12 pm, D'ohBoy <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> [email hidden] wrote (in part):
    >>> ....someone like Carl, who is one of the nicest guys in the group...
    >>> Andres
    >> He is 'nice', but I find the 'dear' annoying and his tone pedantic
    >> (now, now, OB, no need to chime in). It is frequently as if he is
    >> addressing a slightly confused child.
    > Let's call a spade a spade:
    >http://tinyurl.com/2sz9p8
    > or, for the cautious:
    >http://preview.tinyurl.com/2sz9p8
    > (I will resist the urge to add "gossipy, back-biting, busybody who
    > forwards private emails to third parties".)
    Damn it, I hate having to agree with "Ozark Bicycle".

    Quoted message said:

    Suck it up, you'll live. ;-)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Forwarding private
    emails without the permission of the author is inexcusable.

    Quoted message said:

    But being a "gossipy, back-biting busybody" is A-OK with you?

    Dear Ozark Bicycle,

    My omission of specific mention of "gossipy, back-biting busybody" was
    not intended to include those characteristics among acceptable behavior.

    I understand.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.