Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

brakes placement

Started by Gerrit Van Wijk · · Last activity · 6 posts · 641 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 June 2003
Last activity
2 July 2003
Original author
Gerrit Van Wijk
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
641
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. With sleak vbrakes it seems to me a front brake could be behind the steerer tubes and the back brake
    could be in front of the seatstay tubes without getting in the way. It would give panniers more
    room. Could it lead to more squeeling? Or less brake power?

  2. --On Friday said:

    With sleak vbrakes it seems to me a front brake could be behind the steerer tubes and the back
    brake could be in front of the seatstay tubes without getting in the way. It would give panniers
    more room. Could it lead to more squeeling? Or less brake power?

    I think the problem would be what to mount the brake arms to, for they can't simply be
    free-floating, they need a secure point on the frame to pivot from. At least, this is the only major
    constraint I see.

    -Mike

  3. gerrit van wijk said:

    With sleak vbrakes it seems to me a front brake could be behind the steerer tubes and the back
    brake could be in front of the seatstay tubes without getting in the way.

    If the front brake was behind the steerer tube, the arms would foul the downtube when the handlebars
    were rotated.
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> Distortion Field!

  4. "gerrit van wijk" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    With sleak vbrakes it seems to me a front brake could be behind the


    steerer

    Quoted message said:

    tubes and the back brake could be in front of the seatstay tubes without getting in the way. It
    would give panniers more room. Could it lead to more squeeling? Or less brake power?

    I suspect that cable routing also has a lot to do with it.

  5. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by James Messick
    "gerrit van wijk" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    With sleak vbrakes it seems to me a front brake could be behind the


    steerer
    Quoted message said:

    tubes and the back brake could be in front of the seatstay tubes without getting in the way. It
    would give panniers more room. Could it lead to more squeeling? Or less brake power?



    I suspect that cable routing also has a lot to do with it.

    I have placed the rear brake on the underside of the chainstays on my homebuilt recumbent... there has been no noticable drop in performance.

  6. Quoted message said:

    I have placed the rear brake on the underside of the chainstays on my homebuilt recumbent... there
    has been no noticable drop in performance.

    My 1988 mtn bike, still in use as a rainy day commuter bike, came new with the rear brakes mounted
    under the chainstays. They are plenty powerful ( more so than any of my road bikes) - but they tend
    to pick up lots of grit and such from the road, since they are so close to it. I've worn out 3 sets
    of rims on the rear only, since the rear brake pads so often act like sandpaper on the rims.

    I've recently fitted harder pads on the rear, and using the rear brake less.

    erik Brooks, Seattle commuter

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.