Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Brooks saddle choice

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 30 posts · 1,452 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 May 2008
Last activity
4 May 2008
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
30
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,452
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 30
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

  2. Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    Really no answer to this as everybody's bum is a little different and
    bike fit has a big effect on saddle comfort. Go to a shop that has a
    good selection that also has a test or trade policy. Probably a B-17
    or perhaps a Swift but hard to say. I tried Brooks twice(a Swift and a
    Swallow) and I couldn't get used to them. I use SSM Rolls now, have
    for years, still made by Selle San marco.

  3. Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    It is hard to advise on a saddles, but my choice in that situation would
    be the Brooks Team Professional or possibly the B17 narrow.

    I use the above saddles with bar tops 2" to 4" below the saddle and they
    work for me. YBMV

    Marcus

  4. Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com said:
    Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    Quoted message said:

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    Really no answer to this as everybody's bum is a little different and
    bike fit has a big effect on saddle comfort. Go to a shop that has a
    good selection that also has a test or trade policy. Probably a B-17
    or perhaps a Swift but hard to say. I tried Brooks twice(a Swift and a
    Swallow) and I couldn't get used to them. I use SSM Rolls now, have
    for years, still made by Selle San marco.

    The Rolls would be a great choice for a sporty commuter. Classic, flat
    and firm. B-17 if you insist on Brooks. Both run around 30GBP in the
    UK.

  5. Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    The best advice is 'get your butt to a bikeshop with several models of
    Brooks saddles and try them'. They are too expensive to just mail order
    based on advice from someone with a different shape of behind.

    Lou

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    I've been riding Brooks Pros on my road bikes for over 30 years. I used to
    ride Avocet saddles on my MTBs because the gel gave me some extra comfort
    off road.

    Everyone's sitting area is different. You need to determine your personal
    requirements. A properly fitting, properly adjusted saddle should provide
    support for the "sit bones" on both sides of the rear of your pelvis.
    These points are generally wider apart in women than in men.

    You should feel no pressure in the middle or front of your crotch region.
    If you have problems with a "sleepy winky" the saddle is not properly
    adjusted or it's not correct for your anatomy.

    Also you should not feel too much of your body weight distributed to your
    hands.

    Here's a breakdown of the various Brooks models by width across the rear
    of the saddle:

    B17 Standard - Wide flat rear saddle area - suitable for riding upright
    bars. Popular with many commuters.

    Professional - Narrower in the rear and mid section for more performance
    oriented riding.

    Swift - Slightly narrower than a Pro but with cut away sides in the mid
    section for weight savings and less possibility of chafing.

    Swallow - Even narrower than the Swift with cut away sides and titanium
    rails.

    B17 Narrow - Reintroduced??? version of very narrow leather saddles that
    were popular on track bikes before the introduction of plastic saddles.

    They also make various models with coil springs in the rear that were
    designed for upright riding positions on very rough roads.

    Brooks makes a lot of "vanity" versions with different "colour" leather,
    large copper rivets, chrome or copper plated rails plus some with titanium
    rails.

    The conventional wisdom is that it takes about 300 miles to break in a
    Brooks saddle. I have some Brooks Pros that are still as hard as the day
    that I bought them - my butt broke in to them instead.

    Saddles with thick padding or gel may feel comfortable for short distances
    but can start causing numbness after riding some distance because they let
    you sink into them too much.

    About a year and a half ago I discovered WTB saddles. They offer a wide
    selection of anatomically designed saddles for different uses. I prefer
    the Pure-V models because they provide a wide flat area in the rear like a
    brooks Pro. They also have a gel padded area in the midsection and nose to
    ease any pressure on the "personal" areas.

    A lot of other brands are now offering similar models. You may be able to
    find a LBS with test or sample saddles that you can try out.

    Good luck,

    Chas.

  7. "Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    "Really no answer to this as everybody's bum is a little different and
    bike fit has a big effect on saddle comfort. Go to a shop that has a
    good selection that also has a test or trade policy. Probably a B-17
    or perhaps a Swift but hard to say. I tried Brooks twice(a Swift and a
    Swallow) and I couldn't get used to them. I use SSM Rolls now, have
    for years, still made by Selle San marco."

    Peter,

    I've only ridden a few miles on a Brooks Swift. I bought an old bike last
    year with an almost new Swallow on it. Neither of those saddles are very
    comfortable for me. I ride Brooks Pros on most of my road bikes. Some of
    the Pros are more comfortable than others.

    I've also been riding WTB Pure-V saddles on both road and MTBs and found
    them very satisfactory. The gel in the mid section helps prevent "sleepy
    winky" syndrome.

    Chas.

  8. * * Chas said:

    The gel in the mid section helps prevent "sleepy
    winky" syndrome.

    Surely you mean the less vulgar "CPS"? ;-) (cold penis syndrome)

    I'll again post that for those needing support for wide bones, that
    otherwise like those wtb saddles, the Velo Tempo S2 is a great
    solution for not much money.

  9. B-17 standard is the way to go. I wont ride anything else

    Lou Holtman said:
    Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    Quoted message said:

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    The best advice is 'get your butt to a bikeshop with several models of
    Brooks saddles and try them'. They are too expensive to just mail order
    based on advice from someone with a different shape of behind.

    Lou

  10. In my experience the bottom-of-the-line standard-width B17 is a better
    saddle than the more expensive versions. I have three standard B17's
    and had one B17 professional. The standard saddles all broke in much
    faster, probably under 50 miles.
    The professional model never broke in after about 500 miles and
    several months, with resultant saddle sores. I sold it on Craigslist
    for $10 less than I paid. It was a reasonably-priced lesson.
    I see no reason to spring for those Swallows and Swifts. Some users
    trim the B17 leather down to resemble those racy models, but that's
    risky.
    Used Brooks saddles on Ebay are also risky. I bought several and most
    of them were dried out and hard as rocks, which never got better. I
    sold them at a local fleamarket.

    rick b.

  11. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Lou Holtman said:
    Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars
    set 2 inches below the saddle.

    Quoted message said:

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the
    best choice for me. TIA

    The best advice is 'get your butt to a bikeshop with several models
    of Brooks saddles and try them'. They are too expensive to just
    mail order based on advice from someone with a different shape of
    behind.


    B-17 standard is the way to go. I wont ride anything else

    Which works for you but not for me. I find the Brooks Professional is a
    more comfortable saddle- however, I recently acquired a Ti Brooks Pro
    which did not suit me. Close examination and comparison to my other
    Brooks Pros (one of which I have been using more than 30 years) showed
    me that Brooks changed the shape in the past few years. It's slight but
    it's enough to make the saddle a torture device.

    The new-shape B.17 might now be a better choice for me, but I haven't
    tried one yet.

    Anyway Lou's advice is spot-on- Brooks saddles have to be tried to see
    which suits one best.

  12. "landotter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    * * Chas said:

    The gel in the mid section helps prevent "sleepy
    winky" syndrome.

    Surely you mean the less vulgar "CPS"? ;-) (cold penis syndrome)

    I'll again post that for those needing support for wide bones, that
    otherwise like those wtb saddles, the Velo Tempo S2 is a great
    solution for not much money.

    It's always cold in Sverge - except when the mosquitoes are out. ;-)

    Chas.

  13. "Tim McNamara" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Lou Holtman said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars
    > set 2 inches below the saddle.

    > I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    > comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the
    > best choice for me. TIA

    The best advice is 'get your butt to a bikeshop with several models
    of Brooks saddles and try them'. They are too expensive to just
    mail order based on advice from someone with a different shape of
    behind.


    B-17 standard is the way to go. I wont ride anything else

    Which works for you but not for me. I find the Brooks Professional is a
    more comfortable saddle- however, I recently acquired a Ti Brooks Pro
    which did not suit me. Close examination and comparison to my other
    Brooks Pros (one of which I have been using more than 30 years) showed
    me that Brooks changed the shape in the past few years. It's slight but
    it's enough to make the saddle a torture device.

    The new-shape B.17 might now be a better choice for me, but I haven't
    tried one yet.

    Anyway Lou's advice is spot-on- Brooks saddles have to be tried to see
    which suits one best.

    I have 3 or 4 Brooks Pros made during the past few years and they haven't
    broken in after hundreds of miles of riding on each of them. My older Pros
    are still super comfortable after many 1000s of miles of riding. I use a
    dial protractor to adjust the seat angle and -11° measured at the very
    rear of the saddle has been the best for me but on several of the newer
    Pros I've had to go to -14° to avoid pressure in the mid section of the
    saddle.

    B17s are too wide in the rear for me whereas the Pros are just right width
    wise. Most people I've seen riding B17s seem to like them level.

    Chas.

  14. "rick b" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In my experience the bottom-of-the-line standard-width B17 is a better
    saddle than the more expensive versions. I have three standard B17's
    and had one B17 professional. The standard saddles all broke in much
    faster, probably under 50 miles.
    The professional model never broke in after about 500 miles and
    several months, with resultant saddle sores. I sold it on Craigslist
    for $10 less than I paid. It was a reasonably-priced lesson.
    I see no reason to spring for those Swallows and Swifts. Some users
    trim the B17 leather down to resemble those racy models, but that's
    risky.
    Used Brooks saddles on Ebay are also risky. I bought several and most
    of them were dried out and hard as rocks, which never got better. I
    sold them at a local fleamarket.

    rick b.

    Something that I noticed years ago about the B17s is the leather is
    generally thinner than on the Pros. The newer fancy B17s seem to have the
    same thicker leather as the Pros.

    Chas.

  15. * * Chas said:


    B17 Narrow - Reintroduced??? version of very narrow leather saddles that
    were popular on track bikes before the introduction of plastic saddles.

    The B17 Narrow (B17N) has been around forever, I think there is also
    re-released variation with laces sides.
    IIRC it formed the basis of the original Swallow and is pretty much the
    same size.

    I think you are thinking of the B17 Sprinter which was a popular track
    saddle many, many seasons ago and has been re-released for a limited
    run, it is only 133mm wide.

    Marcus

  16. "Marcus Coles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    * * Chas said:


    B17 Narrow - Reintroduced??? version of very narrow leather saddles


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    were popular on track bikes before the introduction of plastic


    saddles.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The B17 Narrow (B17N) has been around forever, I think there is also
    re-released variation with laces sides.
    IIRC it formed the basis of the original Swallow and is pretty much the
    same size.

    I think you are thinking of the B17 Sprinter which was a popular track
    saddle many, many seasons ago and has been re-released for a limited
    run, it is only 133mm wide.

    Marcus

    You're probably correct but they all look painful to me....

    Chas.

  17. Quoted message said:

    I commute to work on a Dawes Giro 300 (03 model), with the bars set 2
    inches below the saddle.

    I need a new saddle. Brooks saddles are widely considered very
    comfortable. There are a wide range of models, which would be the best
    choice for me. TIA

    Brooks saddles are very comfortable and properly cared for will last a
    lifetime. Do you keep your bike indoors when at work, or at least under
    a roof? Rain and sun will shorten the life of a leather saddle. If you
    have to keep the bike outdoors in the weather or ride in rain a lot, you
    may find a leather covered plastic shell saddle will last longer.

    --

    John ([email hidden])

  18. * * Chas said:

    "landotter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    * * Chas said:

    The gel in the mid section helps prevent "sleepy
    winky" syndrome.


    Surely you mean the less vulgar "CPS"? ;-) (cold penis syndrome)

    I'll again post that for those needing support for wide bones, that
    otherwise like those wtb saddles, the Velo Tempo S2 is a great
    solution for not much money.

    It's always cold in Sverge - except when the mosquitoes are out. ;-)


    "landotter" self-reportedly lives in Nashville, Tennessee.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  19. B-17N's are a** hatchets. The standard is what every other saddle
    maker wishes they couldmake!!!

    Marcus Coles said:
    * * Chas said:

    B17 Narrow - Reintroduced??? version of very narrow leather saddles that
    were popular on track bikes before the introduction of plastic saddles.

    The B17 Narrow (B17N) has been around forever, I think there is also
    re-released variation with laces sides.
    IIRC it formed the basis of the original Swallow and is pretty much the
    same size.

    I think you are thinking of the B17 Sprinter which was a popular track
    saddle many, many seasons ago and has been re-released for a limited
    run, it is only 133mm wide.

    Marcus

  20. On May 3, 12:51 am, Tom Sherman <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    * * Chas said:

    "landotter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On May 2, 11:45 am, "* * Chas" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > The gel in the mid section helps prevent "sleepy
    > winky" syndrome.
    Surely you mean the less vulgar "CPS"? ;-) (cold penis syndrome)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'll again post that for those needing support for wide bones, that
    otherwise like those wtb saddles, the Velo Tempo S2 is a great
    solution for not much money.

    Quoted message said:

    It's always cold in Sverge - except when the mosquitoes are out. ;-)

    "landotter" self-reportedly lives in Nashville, Tennessee.

    Actually, I try to not mention my city by name as a matter of habit on
    Usenet. Perhaps you had the location on the tip of your tongue because
    you like to stalk people with your flippy flag.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.