Road Cycling · Public discussion

Burning fat - rate

Started by Sandy · · Last activity · 23 posts · 1,219 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
31 January 2005
Last activity
4 February 2005
Original author
Sandy
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,219
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–23 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I only know two folks that ride ~ 150 miles per week and could be
    described as overweight.
    In both cases they: 1) ride pretty slow- never above 14 mph and hate to
    go uphill, and 2) they eat huge quantities of food. Calories per day
    are probably 4-5000.
    So... .

  2. "TJ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    From what I have seen today, you need a deficit of around 9000 Kcal to
    expend a kilogram of fat. Since the winter has been kind (in fêtes and
    food), I have a surfeit, and want to achieve a loss by April. Is this
    equivalence about right ? No rude questions, now, about the fit of my
    clothes - I already got a Fat Guys jersey as a gift from my daughter, in
    the US. On the other hand, I expect all sorts of rude and harassing
    comments, but "my skin is too thick" to worry.
    --
    Sandy
    Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

    *******

    La vie, c'est comme une bicyclette,
    il faut avancer pour ne pas perdre l'équilibre.
    -- Einstein, A.


    A heart rate monitor is a good tool for burning fat. 60-70% of your max
    is about the best heart rate to burn fat. This is all part of building
    your fitness base. You have an annual training plan right?

    TJ
    www.fatboy.s5.com

    WRONG!!!!! The % of energy from fat may be higher, but the overall
    energy expenditure is what matters, not the fuel. So a higher intensity
    that one can maintain is better.

    Of course, training requires an approach that calls for a high volume during
    base building. Normally, the training will take care of the few excees
    kilos.

    Quoted message said:


  3. "Warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bob M" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de :
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:50:13 -0700, TJ <[email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    > A heart rate monitor is a good tool for burning fat. 60-70% of your
    > max is
    > about the best heart rate to burn fat. This is all part of building


    your

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > fitness base. You have an annual training plan right?
    >
    > TJ

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, the harder you work out, the more fat you burn (in terms of
    calories). You tend to burn a higher percentage of fat at relatively


    low

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    HRs, but overall calorie (including fat) burning is higher at the
    higher
    HRs.

    --
    Bob in CT

    Thanks Bob - Thanks TJ -
    Did anyone ever suggest to you two, that answering the specific question


    is

    Quoted message said:

    useful ?

    Not to worry, both of their answers were so inaccurate your return is
    about
    the same.

    TJ: at those low HR's you will *probably* be burning mostly fat, IF your
    slow twitch muscles and some other things are developed sufficiently to
    burn
    mostly fat for fuel. You may want to read around on the 'net about what is
    really happening when you are building a "fitness base" properly. Try a
    google on stuff like capillary density, mitochondrial density, increasing
    these things, what intensities are best for increasing these things, etc.

    Bob: the harder you ride the more calories per hour you'll burn. The
    mixture
    of carbs/fat changes as you increase your intensity. By the time you're
    riding at say, 85% of your MHR you are likely to be burning far more carb
    calories than fat calories. Perhaps in the range of 75-80% of your MHR you
    are burning a higher ratio of carbs to fat but you're still burning lots
    of
    fat calories. Raising your resting metabolic rate can be useful too.

    None of that really matters. All that matters is creating an energy
    deficit. Seen any real fat sprinters at a World Cup event? How much "fat
    burning" riding do you think they do?

    Quoted message said:


    The other question is, how many hours per week can you ride before you run
    out of time or energy? If you can ride 20 hours per week you may be best
    riding near 70-75% of your MHR to maximize your fat burning totals.. If
    you
    can only ride 7 hours a week you may be better off riding closer to
    75%-80%
    of your MHR.

    Understand also that MHR isn't a very good way to measure intensity for a
    group of people because the lactate threshold (and some other things that
    are important) doesn't occur at the same HR% for everyone. Riding the same
    way each day isn't optimal in most cases.

    -Warren

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.