Quoted message said:On 30 Jun 2006 05:58:07 -0700, "Brian Tkatch"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
[snip]
Quoted message said:One thing about that Sheldon Brown site, however, is that the
background many times makes the text difficult for me to read. Well, i
just highlight it to read it, so it's ok.
B.
Dear Brian,
Some day, web-page designers will look at a book or word processor
screen and notice the advantages of a blank background.
Until then, we have to deal with the fuzz and clutter of
something-or-other logos that make it hard to read what we're
interested in.
It's unlikely that anyone would guess what the logo is on this page
unless they scrolled down to the explanation:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/
Of course, a clearer design on the background logo would only make the
text even harder to read.
To be fair, the background isn't that bad, but your comment reminds me
just how low my standards have sunk. Like the apocryphal frog in the
pot on the stove that fails to notice the water temperature slowly
rising, I've gotten used to web-page backgrounds that make it hard to
read their own text.
Switch back and forth from the link above with its endless logo
background to this one with its plain desert yellow for a good
comparison:
http://sheldonbrown.com/home.html
Much easier to read.
Or look at this large new section:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/
No wallpaper pattern of bicycle wheels, just a blank khaki background.
(There! I've vented my spleen and lashed out with unprovoked fury at
Sheldon Brown! That'll teach him to provide an enormous free resource
of wonderful bicycling stuff for the likes of me to enjoy! I should
have worked in something about burning the Harris site to the ground
to get rid of that logo, but probably someone would fail to read
Sheldon's explanation of the logo and take me seriously.)
(Now I'm filled with remorse. What can I do to make up for savaging
Sheldon's innocent logo? I could hit the delete button and not send
this post . . . Fat chance.)
(Hmmm . . . Jobst has been politely asking me via email to please use
tinyURL for the long addresses I fling about in other posts because
some posters have to copy and paste four lines together just to see
what nonsense I'm talking about. So I'll try to tinyURL long addresses
as penance. I'll start right now . . . Oops, Sheldon's site may have
background logos, but it has nothing but short, sensible URL's.)
Carl Fogel
Thanx for the reply. 🙂
I also don't mean to complain about the free resource. Well, actually i
do, it does bother me. But i don't mean for the complaint to cause any
negativity for the (gracious) provider, just to vent some frustrations,
however slight, as they are worse to bottle up, and perhaps, even the
provider would accept it as constructive criticism, and be thankful for
the honest comment.
B.