UK and Europe · Public discussion

By 'eck, that were close...

Started by General Easterly · · Last activity · 11 posts · 499 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
6 January 2006
Last activity
9 January 2006
Original author
General Easterly
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
499
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Fuel tanks falls off Harrier Jet and misses cyclist by inches.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/4589508.stm

    Should have been wearing a h*lm*t, then he wouldn't have had to worry,
    what with the magic properties one gives you. :-)

  2. "General Easterly" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Fuel tanks falls off Harrier Jet and misses cyclist by inches.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/4589508.stm

    Should have been wearing a h*lm*t, then he wouldn't have had to worry,
    what with the magic properties one gives you. :-)

    very funny! Not
    I try not to enter the helmet debate and I am aware of the limitations of
    its protection. However I wear my helmet whenever I am astride my bike ( and
    several times when I have forgotten I have it on) .
    But with young people / children in low speed / fooling around / learning
    situations it has to be a good idea

    In Winter I wear mine to keep my head warm and dry and to carry an extra
    powerful LED light; and the bright yellow cover might mean I can be seen.

    And yes "mi lud" I was wearing a helmet when that man in the motorised metal
    box hit me!

    --
    Trevor A Panther
    In South Yorkshire,
    England, United Kingdom.

  3. Pinky said:

    "General Easterly" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Fuel tanks falls off Harrier Jet and misses cyclist by inches.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/4589508.stm

    Should have been wearing a h*lm*t, then he wouldn't have had to worry,
    what with the magic properties one gives you. :-)

    very funny! Not


    Come on. It is funny (as the bloke was OK).
    A spare pair of shorts would probably have been more use though.

    And your comments on helmets are perfectly valid.
    What the argument is about is compulsion to wear them, not you
    choosing to wear one when you feel it appropriate.

  4. in message <[email hidden]>, Pinky
    ([email hidden]'😉 wrote:

    [helmets]

    Quoted message said:

    But with young people / children in low speed / fooling around /
    learning situations it has to be a good idea

    Absolutely. Don't think anyone would disagree with that. Also a lot of
    off-road stuff.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ((DoctorWho)ChristopherEccleston).act();
    uk.co.bbc.TypecastException: actor does not want to be typecast.
    [adapted from autofile on /., 31/03/05]

  5. John Hearns <[email hidden]> whizzed past me shouting

    Quoted message said:


    And your comments on helmets are perfectly valid.
    What the argument is about is compulsion to wear them, not you
    choosing to wear one when you feel it appropriate.

    He's even welcome to wear one as a security blanket or with a cuddly toy
    dragon attached - so long as he doesn't expect me to do likewise.

    If the helmets were really intended as protection you wouldn't see so
    many people wearing a woolly hat underneath them, which prevents them
    fitting properly.

    --
    Sue ]🙁🙂

    Why is it always the helmet wearer that dies?

  6. "Sue White" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    John Hearns <[email hidden]> whizzed past me shouting

    Quoted message said:


    And your comments on helmets are perfectly valid.
    What the argument is about is compulsion to wear them, not you
    choosing to wear one when you feel it appropriate.

    He's even welcome to wear one as a security blanket or with a cuddly toy
    dragon attached - so long as he doesn't expect me to do likewise.

    If the helmets were really intended as protection you wouldn't see so many
    people wearing a woolly hat underneath them, which prevents them fitting
    properly.

    --
    Sue ]🙁🙂

    Why is it always the helmet wearer that dies?


    I never even asked you to wear one. It is your choice as it is mine. You are
    verging on being extremely impolite -- which I was not in any way!.

    May I add fuel to your fire by saying that your "over the top" response
    tends to be typical of the anti helmet brigade. Which is the very reason
    that I normally refrain from entering into the usual diatribe that occurs
    when helmets are ranted on about.

    I am not in favour of compulsion but I am in favour of doing what I believe
    to be in MY ( --- my --- not your) interests.

    I shall not post any more in response to this.

    Trevor A Panther
    In South Yorkshire,
    England, United Kingdom.

  7. Pinky said:

    I shall not post any more in response to this.

    That's it. Get your cheap shot in then run off.

    --
    Dave...

  8. \ /
    \ /
    \/ to you too

    "Dave Kahn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    ..

    Quoted message said:


    That's it. Get your cheap shot in then run off.

    --
    Dave...

  9. Pinky said:

    "Dave Kahn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That's it. Get your cheap shot in then run off.


    \ /
    \ /
    \/ to you too

    Thank you for confirming my opinion of you.

    (Top posting corrected.)

    --
    Dave...

  10. "Pinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Sue White" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    John Hearns <[email hidden]> whizzed past me shouting

    Quoted message said:


    And your comments on helmets are perfectly valid.
    What the argument is about is compulsion to wear them, not you
    choosing to wear one when you feel it appropriate.

    He's even welcome to wear one as a security blanket or with a cuddly toy
    dragon attached - so long as he doesn't expect me to do likewise.

    If the helmets were really intended as protection you wouldn't see so
    many people wearing a woolly hat underneath them, which prevents them
    fitting properly.

    --
    Sue ]🙁🙂

    Why is it always the helmet wearer that dies?


    I never even asked you to wear one. It is your choice as it is mine. You
    are verging on being extremely impolite -- which I was not in any way!.

    May I add fuel to your fire by saying that your "over the top" response
    tends to be typical of the anti helmet brigade. Which is the very reason
    that I normally refrain from entering into the usual diatribe that occurs
    when helmets are ranted on about.

    I am not in favour of compulsion but I am in favour of doing what I
    believe to be in MY ( --- my --- not your) interests.

    I shall not post any more in response to this.

    Good!

    Alan

    Quoted message said:


    Trevor A Panther
    In South Yorkshire,
    England, United Kingdom.

  11. "Pinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    \ /
    \ /
    \/ to you too

    "Dave Kahn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    A liar as well, you had made it clear you were not going to post any more,
    but here you are.

    Alan

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.