General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Carb Loading vs. Fat Loading?

Started by Karl Hungus · · Last activity · 11 posts · 2,853 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 September 2003
Last activity
3 November 2003
Original author
Karl Hungus
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,853
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I hear a lot of folks here refer to carb loading from time to time, and that it's a potentially
    beneficial step in preparing for a longer event, such as a marathon. It seems, however, the Atkins
    people think that fat loading might be better:

    atkins.com28 742445.html

  2. Karl Hungus said:

    I hear a lot of folks here refer to carb loading from time to time, and that it's a potentially
    beneficial step in preparing for a longer event, such as a marathon. It seems, however, the Atkins
    people think that fat loading might be better:

    atkins.com28 742445.html

    Unless your bodyfat levels are dangerously low, why would you need to purposely load up on fats for
    an endurance event? Also, the article mentions the importance of protein and is actually advocating
    a moderate fat diet (42% of total calories). The remaining 58% of calories would come from carbs
    and protein.

  3. Karl Hungus said:

    I hear a lot of folks here refer to carb loading from time to time, and that it's a potentially
    beneficial step in preparing for a longer event, such as a marathon. It seems, however, the Atkins
    people think that fat loading might be better:

    atkins.com28 742445.html

    Tell ya what, YOU try it, and write me if you live.

  4. Karl Hungus said:

    I hear a lot of folks here refer to carb loading from time to time, and that it's a potentially
    beneficial step in preparing for a longer event, such as a marathon. It seems, however, the Atkins
    people think that fat loading might be better:

    atkins.com28 742445.html

    From Article

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Where is her body going to find the protein to fuel her for those 45 minutes on the stair-climbing
    machine?

    Wow very interesting. When did protein become the main source for the body to create energy?

    Also after actually looking at the abstract of teh first study used as a "basis" of
    teh article.

    jap.physiology.org115

    The comparison was between a group of cyclist that ate a high fat or high carb diet for 6-7 days,
    rested on the 8th day but both groups had a high carb diet on the 8th day. On teh 9th day they ate a
    pre excercise meal, not mentioned of what I'm assuming high carb, and then rode for 4 hours.

    This actually make a little more sense as carbs are usually replaced within 24-48 hrs. A carb
    depleted athlete on high fat woudl have significant amount of fatty truglycerides(SP) avaialable for
    endurance and once teh carbss were replaced would be good to go. The low fat 17%< woudl have fewer
    tryglicerides floating around adn less "endurance" based fuel. Notice that the TT performance was
    the same for both groups. Imagine what it woudl have been without the Carb loading.

    When people start twisting and or blatently miss quoting studies to pass there wares you
    know that somethings wrong with the product.

    BTW I didn't bother looking up the other two studies referenced.

    ~Matt

  5. "Radioactive Man" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Karl Hungus said:

    I hear a lot of folks here refer to carb loading from time to time, and


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it's a potentially beneficial step in preparing for a longer event, such


    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a marathon. It seems, however, the Atkins people think that fat loading might be better:

    atkins.com28 742445.html

    Unless your bodyfat levels are dangerously low, why would you need to purposely load up on fats
    for an endurance event? Also, the article mentions the importance of protein and is actually
    advocating a moderate fat diet (42% of total calories). The remaining 58% of calories would come
    from carbs and protein.

    You call 42% fat, "moderate"? That is about what Americans are getting already.

  6. <MJuric> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Karl Hungus said:

    I hear a lot of folks here refer to carb loading from time to time, and


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it's a potentially beneficial step in preparing for a longer event, such


    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a marathon. It seems, however, the Atkins people think that fat loading might be better:

    atkins.com28 742445.html

    From Article

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Where is her body going to find the protein to fuel her for those 45


    minutes on the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    stair-climbing machine?

    Wow very interesting. When did protein become the main source for the body to create energy?

    Also after actually looking at the abstract of teh first study used as a "basis" of teh article.

    jap.physiology.org115

    The comparison was between a group of cyclist that ate a high fat or high carb diet for 6-7 days,
    rested on the 8th day but both groups had a high carb diet on the 8th day. On teh 9th day they ate
    a pre excercise meal, not mentioned of what I'm assuming high carb, and then rode for 4 hours.

    This actually make a little more sense as carbs are usually replaced within 24-48 hrs. A carb
    depleted athlete on high fat woudl have significant amount of fatty truglycerides(SP) avaialable
    for endurance and once teh carbss were replaced would be good to go. The low fat 17%< woudl have
    fewer tryglicerides floating around adn less "endurance" based fuel. Notice that the TT
    performance was the same for both groups. Imagine what it woudl have been without the Carb
    loading.

    When people start twisting and or blatently miss quoting studies to pass there wares you know that
    somethings wrong with the product.

    BTW I didn't bother looking up the other two studies referenced.

    ~Matt

    It should be noted that a recent paper by Bussau showed that one day of very high CHO could do a
    great job of glycogen loading. In Bussau the subjects consumed 10g/kg the day before and 24 hours
    later had as much glycogen in the muscle as doing that protocol for several days.

    Consuming the high CHO diet over all those days would probably not have had a significant impact on
    glycogen stores. And over such a short period of time, there would be little detraining so the
    cumulative effect of glycogen depletion on training impulse would be minimal.

  7. Sam said:


    "Radioactive Man" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Karl Hungus said:

    I hear a lot of folks here refer to carb loading from time to time, and


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it's a potentially beneficial step in preparing for a longer event, such


    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a marathon. It seems, however, the Atkins people think that fat loading might be better:

    atkins.com28 742445.html

    Unless your bodyfat levels are dangerously low, why would you need to purposely load up on fats
    for an endurance event? Also, the article mentions the importance of protein and is actually
    advocating a moderate fat diet (42% of total calories). The remaining 58% of calories would come
    from carbs and protein.

    You call 42% fat, "moderate"? That is about what Americans are getting already.

    Yes. A diet with 42% of its total calories from fat would be only about 24% fat by weight (of those
    components that have calories). You could very easily get this by throwing a little parmesian cheese
    or avacado onto a salad. - no need to smother it with bacon bits. "High" fat would be a salad
    smothered in bacon bits.

  8. Quoted message said:

    It seems, however, the Atkins people think that fat loading might be better:

    from the who gives a **it world, I happen to fat load the day before my races be that dinner and/or
    breakfast but I assure you it hasn't anything to do with the moronic Atkins diet. I probably eat
    about 25% of my calories from fat.

    --
    Doug Freese "Caveat Lector" [email hidden]

  9. Doug Freese said:

    I probably eat about

    Ever see "Sanford and Son" Doug? Practice doing an imitation of Fred having "the big one", grabbing
    your chest and falling over. That is your future.

  10. noPok said:

    Ever see "Sanford and Son" Doug? Practice doing an imitation of Fred having "the big one", grabbing
    your chest and falling over. That is your future.

    On 25% *calories* (ie less than <<10% by weight) from fat? If you're right, I'm gonna go back to
    school and set up as a cardiologist in the states. After 5 year's practicing, I'll be able to buy
    Florida, let alone go live there...

  11. steve common said:
    noPok said:

    Ever see "Sanford and Son" Doug? Practice doing an imitation of Fred having "the big one",
    grabbing your chest and falling over. That is your future.

    On 25% *calories* (ie less than <<10% by weight) from fat? If you're right, I'm gonna go back to
    school and set up as a cardiologist in the states. After 5 year's practicing, I'll be able to buy
    Florida, let alone go live there...

    Of course I'm right, you fat porker.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.