Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

carbon plane crashworthiness?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 67 posts · 1,383 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 September 2007
Last activity
28 September 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
67
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,383
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 67
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    There are many types of composites in aircraft - the differences are mainly
    in the resin (or matrix) properties and methods of manufacture. It's almost
    a certainty that the composites used in the 787 are not used by bike
    manufacturers (the latter using cheaper alternatives).

    But hey, we all just need to calm the f&^* down. According to r.b.t.'s
    resident "metallurgist" (he went to materials skool), all Boeing needs to do
    is listen to the composites - they will either talk or sing before they fail
    (and burn), in plenty of time beforehand. It's a perfect job for a CF
    Whisperer!

  3. Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes.

    eh? has this nimrod been inside a plane in the last 46 years? nothing
    but composites. they burn devastatingly. having a carbon skin's not
    going to make damn-all difference to the smell of roasting pork.

    Quoted message said:

    He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  4. Jambo said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    There are many types of composites in aircraft - the differences are mainly
    in the resin (or matrix) properties and methods of manufacture. It's almost
    a certainty that the composites used in the 787 are not used by bike
    manufacturers (the latter using cheaper alternatives).

    But hey, we all just need to calm the f&^* down. According to r.b.t.'s
    resident "metallurgist" (he went to materials skool), all Boeing needs to do
    is listen to the composites - they will either talk or sing before they fail
    (and burn), in plenty of time beforehand. It's a perfect job for a CF
    Whisperer!

    hey moron, you figured out what "plasticity" is yet?
    hey moron, you figured out what "density" is yet?
    hey moron, you figured out what "modulus" is yet?

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.htm
    l

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    If I should die in a plane crash, I'd prefer for a spectacular one. CF
    fits the bill! 🙂
    --

  6. Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    Quoted message said:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    Quoted message said:

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    Quoted message said:

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boei...
    l

    Quoted message said:

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    If I should die in a plane crash, I'd prefer for a spectacular one. CF
    fits the bill! 🙂
    --- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    words that may become a regretful portent

  7. jim beam said:
    Jambo said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boei...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    Quoted message said:

    There are many types of composites in aircraft - the differences are mainly
    in the resin (or matrix) properties and methods of manufacture. It's almost
    a certainty that the composites used in the 787 are not used by bike
    manufacturers (the latter using cheaper alternatives).

    Quoted message said:

    But hey, we all just need to calm the f&^* down. According to r.b.t.'s
    resident "metallurgist" (he went to materials skool), all Boeing needs to do
    is listen to the composites - they will either talk or sing before they fail
    (and burn), in plenty of time beforehand. It's a perfect job for a CF
    Whisperer!

    hey moron, you figured out what "plasticity" is yet?
    hey moron, you figured out what "density" is yet?
    hey moron, you figured out what "modulus" is yet?

    Jim:

    Your behavior is skewing fourth grade if you hadn't noticed.

    FYI.

    D'ohBoy

  8. Artoi said:

    If I should die in a plane crash, I'd prefer for a spectacular one. CF
    fits the bill! 🙂
    --

    Plane crashes should be jagged, not bristly!

  9. Quoted message said:

    There are many types of composites in aircraft - the differences are
    mainly in the resin (or matrix) properties and methods of manufacture.
    It's almost a certainty that the composites used in the 787 are not used
    by bike manufacturers (the latter using cheaper alternatives).

    This is categorically untrue. Presently, the domestic carbon fiber bike
    industry (at least one manufacturer anyway) is using a high-modulus carbon
    fiber that is not allowed to be exported into China (or many other
    countries). This stuff is very expensive, extraordinarily high-quality and
    has many military applications.

    Boeing has spent a fair amount of time in Waterloo, Wisconsin lately.
    Perhaps you can figure out why.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    "Jambo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    There are many types of composites in aircraft - the differences are
    mainly in the resin (or matrix) properties and methods of manufacture.
    It's almost a certainty that the composites used in the 787 are not used
    by bike manufacturers (the latter using cheaper alternatives).

    But hey, we all just need to calm the f&^* down. According to r.b.t.'s
    resident "metallurgist" (he went to materials skool), all Boeing needs to
    do is listen to the composites - they will either talk or sing before they
    fail (and burn), in plenty of time beforehand. It's a perfect job for a
    CF Whisperer!

  10. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    There are many types of composites in aircraft - the differences are
    mainly in the resin (or matrix) properties and methods of manufacture.
    It's almost a certainty that the composites used in the 787 are not used
    by bike manufacturers (the latter using cheaper alternatives).

    This is categorically untrue. Presently, the domestic carbon fiber bike
    industry (at least one manufacturer anyway) is using a high-modulus carbon
    fiber that is not allowed to be exported into China (or many other
    countries). This stuff is very expensive, extraordinarily high-quality and
    has many military applications.

    I'm not sure you read my statement correctly. The fact that some carbon
    fiber types are not allowed export to China says nothing about whether 787
    composites are used in the bike industry. As I've stated, there are many
    types of composites.

    You need to remember that composite components, and the particular composite
    material used, are chosen specifically for the intended use. Since the 787
    composites are new, and have specialist characteristics desirable for the
    aircraft itself, not least Boeing's specific requirement to meet its own
    BMS8-276 specification for primary structure prepregs
    (http://www.compositesworld.com/hpc/issues/2007/May/111535), it is almost a
    certainty that the composites used in the 787 are not used by bike
    manufacturers (the latter using cheaper alternatives).

    Here's an extract from the ref:
    "Without doubt, the largest supplier of 787 composite materials is Toray
    Industries (Tokyo, Japan). The company is providing its trademarked Torayca
    3900-series highly toughened carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy prepreg for the
    787's primary structure in unidirectional tape (various widths), narrow slit
    tape (for fiber placement), and woven fabric forms. The majority of the
    3900-series materials will be made with intermediate modulus T800S fiber.
    According to Earl Benton, director of sales and marketing for Toray's U.S.
    subsidiary Toray Composites (America) Inc. (TCA, Tacoma, Wash.), the T800S
    fiber, which replaced the T800H fiber used initially on the Boeing 777, is
    the result of improved carbon fiber manufacturing processes, which result in
    higher production rates, and better availability without sacrificing
    mechanical performance or the company's ability to meet Boeing's rigorous
    BMS8-276 specification for primary structure prepregs. Boeing qualified the
    prepreg's basic unidirectional product form for the 777 prior to 2004, in
    advance of the 787 program."

    On the other hand, if you are saying that the bike industry is NOT using
    cheaper alternatives to 787 composites, you will have to cite the bike
    composite material you think is as expensive as the 787 composite.

    In the matter of CF export prohibitions from the US to China, it's a
    relatively new regulation (2007); see
    http://www.hklaw.com/Publications/Newsletters.asp?IssueID=810&Article=4172

    "Under What Circumstances Do the New Restrictions Apply?
    Licensing restrictions apply if: (1) a product, software or technology is
    identified in the expanded list of controlled items; and (2) the U.S.
    exporter knows or has reason to know that the item is going to a military
    end-use."

    Which Products, Software and Technology Are Included on the New List of
    Controlled Items?

    Listed Items

    The list of products, software and technology are all items already
    identified on the Commerce Control List (CCL) of controlled dual-use goods.
    However, the new restrictions apply to items that, prior to issuance of this
    regulation, could generally be exported without a license to any country and
    entity person - except embargoed countries and certain prohibited
    end-users/end-uses. The list identifies products from various categories -
    including, but not limited to, the following:

    a.. aircraft
    b.. aero gas turbine engines
    c.. airborne communication and navigation systems
    d.. carbon fiber and prepregs for use in composite structures
    e.. hydraulic fluids "
    etc.....

    Quoted message said:

    Boeing has spent a fair amount of time in Waterloo, Wisconsin lately.
    Perhaps you can figure out why.

    Could be a gazillion things. Possibilities:
    - Trek contracts Boeing QC expertise in manufacturing their carbon fiber
    frames
    - Seek Boeing expertise in damage assessment
    - Licence Boeing composites for Trek bike frames

    Why don't you use your contacts to find out?

  11. "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jambo said:

    But hey, we all just need to calm the f&^* down. According to r.b.t.'s
    resident "metallurgist" (he went to materials skool), all Boeing needs to
    do is listen to the composites - they will either talk or sing before
    they fail (and burn), in plenty of time beforehand. It's a perfect job
    for a CF Whisperer!

    hey moron, you figured out what "plasticity" is yet?

    Why yes, beamboy. Metal is NOT plastic, no matter how much you try to spin
    it.

    Quoted message said:

    hey moron, you figured out what "density" is yet?

    Why yes, beamboy. Look at my other post for my definitive definition of
    "weight" and "density", in terms you can understand!

    Quoted message said:

    hey moron, you figured out what "modulus" is yet?

    Why yes, beamboy. Specific modulus >< Young's modulus, no matter how much
    you try to spin it.

    Can you provide some advice? If I go to "materials skool", will I also be
    able to hear CF talking or singing to me before they fail? I want to start
    my own company, CF Whisperers Inc.

  12. Jambo' [email protected] said:

    "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jambo said:

    But hey, we all just need to calm the f&^* down. According to r.b.t.'s
    resident "metallurgist" (he went to materials skool), all Boeing needs to
    do is listen to the composites - they will either talk or sing before
    they fail (and burn), in plenty of time beforehand. It's a perfect job
    for a CF Whisperer!

    Quoted message said:

    hey moron, you figured out what "plasticity" is yet?

    Why yes, beamboy. Metal is NOT plastic, no matter how much you try to spin
    it.

    Quoted message said:

    hey moron, you figured out what "density" is yet?

    Why yes, beamboy. Look at my other post for my definitive definition of
    "weight" and "density", in terms you can understand!

    Quoted message said:

    hey moron, you figured out what "modulus" is yet?

    Why yes, beamboy. Specific modulus >< Young's modulus, no matter how much
    you try to spin it.

    Can you provide some advice? If I go to "materials skool", will I also be
    able to hear CF talking or singing to me before they fail? I want to start
    my own company, CF Whisperers Inc.

    Yes, I suppose if you had the education and the social skills you
    could start a company that manufactures embedded acoustic emission
    transducers. You know, those things they build into composite parts
    to hear them crack? Of course if you or jb had either of those
    attributes, it would deny me the pleasure of watching the two of you
    type out of your asses at each other.


  13. Quoted message said:

    Boeing has spent a fair amount of time in Waterloo, Wisconsin lately.
    Perhaps you can figure out why.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    Trek is investigating CF inspection techniques for 3rd party supplied
    parts ?
    They probably want to make sure they aren't getting carbon wrapped
    fiberglass TCT bike frames from some creative supplier.

    Scott G.
    Who doesn't remember seeing Treks name in Aviation Week.

  14. Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:
    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html
    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    My Kestrel's probably safe without a couple tons of jet fuel onboard. I
    can't recall any crash of mine with actual flames although as a winter
    bike I have thought about it.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  15. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I suppose if you had the education and the social skills you
    could start a company that manufactures embedded acoustic emission
    transducers. You know, those things they build into composite parts
    to hear them crack?

    It's good to see that you seem to know what acoustic emission transducers
    are, but then again, it's not that hard to Google.

    However, Acoustic Emission techniques make use of transducers that detect
    mechanical movement IN THE COMPONENT due to impact or excitation, which are
    then transformed and amplified into electronic signals - the transducers DO
    NOT detect sound (even though sound is part of the energy release of the
    material that has been deformed or fractured)
    http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/9811/Huang/Huang-9811.html
    http://www.acousticemission.net/background.asp

    So, I think I can legitimately say that I avoided "typing out of my ass".

    Quoted message said:

    Of course if you or jb had either of those
    attributes, it would deny me the pleasure of watching the two of you
    type out of your asses at each other.

    And of course, if your opinion mattered to me, I would be mucho hurt.

  16. "A Muzi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    My Kestrel's probably safe without a couple tons of jet fuel onboard. I
    can't recall any crash of mine with actual flames although as a winter
    bike I have thought about it.

    Well obviously you don't ride fast enough!

  17. On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:28:12 -0500, A Muzi <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:
    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html
    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    My Kestrel's probably safe without a couple tons of jet fuel onboard. I
    can't recall any crash of mine with actual flames although as a winter
    bike I have thought about it.

    Dear Andrew,

    Some day, I'll find the story whose Walter-Mitty-esque hero, driving
    an ordinary sedan and imagining a more exciting life as a race car
    driver, fantasizes about flames shooting from the dashboard clock.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  18. A Muzi said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    My Kestrel's probably safe without a couple tons of jet fuel onboard. I
    can't recall any crash of mine with actual flames although as a winter
    bike I have thought about it.

    Maybe a carbon version of the Moots Snoots, with white gas stored in
    each fork leg and the down tube, would do the job.

  19. Quoted message said:

    It looks as if Boeing is imitating RBT:

    "Forty-six-year veteran Vince Weldon contends that in a crash landing
    that would be survivable in a metal airplane, the new jet's innovative
    composite plastic materials will shatter too easily and burn with
    toxic fumes. He backs up his views with e-mails from engineering
    colleagues at Boeing and claims the company isn't doing enough to test
    the plane's crashworthiness."

    "Boeing vigorously denies Weldon's assertions, saying the questions he
    raised internally were addressed to the satisfaction of its technical
    experts."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2003889663_boeing180.html

    At least we don't worry about carbon fiber bicycle frames burning.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Here's a 7 minute video of Sam Whittingham and others at Battle
    Mountain, with lots of interesting details, such as the search of the
    maximum allowable 2/3% slope in the western U.S.:

    At 1:30, Whittingham comments on carbon fiber, kevlar, and crashing.

    🙂

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  20. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    Here's a 7 minute video of Sam Whittingham and others at Battle
    Mountain, with lots of interesting details, such as the search of the
    maximum allowable 2/3% slope in the western U.S.:

    At 1:30, Whittingham comments on carbon fiber, kevlar, and crashing.

    🙂

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Thanks Carl. General FYI, here's the salient quote:

    "The kevlar is really important for crashing 'cause carbon fibre gives
    it the strength but the kevlar gives it its resistance to wearing
    through if you fall over."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.