On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:04:16 +0800, Michael J. Klein
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
<[email hidden]>:
Quoted message said:I asked my LBS about putting a rear cargo rack on my new
Yukon MTB. He said that nobody does that, and it would
limit my use of the bike for off-roading.
He lied. I have a rack on my MTB and so do lots of other
people I know. The Yukon is a hartail, right? The rack will
not be in the way. Only if you wanted to hang right over the
rear wheel in extreme descents would it be an issue - and in
that case you'd probably be on the wrong bike anyway ;-)
Quoted message said:The reason that I have an MTB for street use is the nature
of the roads here. Often they are un-improved and differing
levels which I feel could be more easily negotiated by a
mountain bike rather than a road/comfort bike. Given that I
don't use it for actual hardcore off-roading, are there any
other considerations about mounting a rear cargo rack on my
MTB, other than it looking retarded?
None, probably. I had to use P-clips on my MTB because the
rack I had spare didn't have a brake bridge mounting bar,
you can get three-point mounting racks which bolt to the
brake bridge if you don't have braze-ons. You might have
trouble if you don't have eyelets, but I've never seen a
bike which didn't have at least one set of eyelets.
Sometimes you get single eyelets and have to share the
bolt with the mudguards [fenders] and sometimes you get
double eyelets.
As to looking dorky, well, I'm not qualified to comment.
We have seven active bikes in the family (4 MTBs, one
tourer, a recumbent and a triplet) and every one is fitted
with a rack.
Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.ukOpen ↗
88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
Washington University