Is the conventional wisdom on chain lube for downhillers - that the primary concern should be minimizing wear and tear on the chain to extend its lifespan - missing the point entirely? Are we prioritizing the wrong factors in our lube choices, and as a result, sacrificing performance and durability in the process?
It seems to me that most discussions around chain lube for downhillers focus on the longevity of the chain, with many riders opting for dry or wax-based lubes that promise to repel dirt and grime. However, Im not convinced that this is the right approach. Downhill riding is notoriously demanding on chains, with frequent high-speed descents, technical features, and rough terrain all demanding rapid acceleration and deceleration.
In this context, isnt the primary concern actually keeping the chain running smoothly and consistently, rather than just trying to make it last as long as possible? If were sacrificing performance and durability in the name of minimizing wear and tear, are we really getting the best results? Shouldnt we be looking for lubes that provide superior durability and performance, even if it means the chain needs to be replaced a bit more frequently?
Ive heard some riders swear by using very thin, synthetic lubes that are designed to penetrate deep into the chain, providing exceptional lubricity and wear protection. Others claim that thicker, more viscous lubes are the way to go, as they provide a more substantial barrier against contamination and wear.
So, whats the real story here? Are we just following the conventional wisdom without questioning its assumptions, or is there something more at play? Should we be rethinking our approach to chain lube for downhillers, and prioritizing performance and durability over longevity? What are your experiences, and what do you think is the best approach?