Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Chain Maintenance

Started by angotja · · Last activity · 69 posts · 3,689 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 June 2004
Last activity
22 June 2004
Original author
angotja
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,689
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance out of your chain...

    --

  2. anagotja-<< Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance out of your
    chain... >><BR><BR>

    Keep it and the cogs, rings, pulleys clean. Connect the chain with a snap link,
    take all above off regularly to clean, lube, ride the next day.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  3. On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:30:07 GMT, angotja

    may have said:

    Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance out of your chain...

    Performance is in the rider, not the chain.

    Did you mean to ask about durability? Then follow the manufacturer's
    recommendations.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  4. Werehatrack said:

    On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:30:07 GMT, angotja <usenet-
    [email hidden]> may have said:
    Performance is in the rider, not the chain.
    Did you mean to ask about durability? Then follow the manufacturer's
    recommendations.

    W/respect, of course I mean durability (I wasn't aware that
    'performance' had such a specific connotation). I know there are a
    couple of schools of thought on this issue, and I thought it might be
    interesting/beneficial to see a discussion on this subject.

    I generally just wipe it clean and re-lube. If it is heavily soiled, I
    will use a solvent and some q-tips to clean it up as best I can, then
    re-lube & ride. I lube on a weekly/75 mi schedule, and clean as needed.

    I am interested to learn the techniques of others...

    --

  5. If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be removing that chain
    unless you put a high strength replacement pin in to replace the one you
    removed. Existing pins have a peaned end and removing and replacing will
    weaken the end of the pin and may cause you to break the chain. I speak
    from experience. By using a thinner or petrol solvent bath, you are washing
    away all the existing internal lubricant from the chain rollers and can
    cause rust to start and thusly also weakening the chain..

    Just go to Academy Sports or Nashbar and get a Finish Line chain cleaner
    gizmo ($20). Their bio cleaner works well without completely stripping the
    chain. You don't need to be cleaning it that much!!! Then generously
    recoat the chain with chain lube, wipe excess off, clean and oil the jockey
    wheels and you're done!! Shouldn't take more than 10 minutes.

    Chris
    2200 Trek

  6. On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:47:30 GMT, angotja

    may have said:

    I generally just wipe it clean and re-lube. If it is heavily soiled, I
    will use a solvent and some q-tips to clean it up as best I can, then
    re-lube & ride. I lube on a weekly/75 mi schedule, and clean as needed.

    I am interested to learn the techniques of others...

    As noted in another thread just a few topics above this one (and in
    countless others over the years), chain lube rituals are as varied as
    the people performing them. Results seem to be just as varied. The
    recommendation from SRAM for their chains is a wipe/relube regimen
    using no solvents or degreasers. Shimano's recommendations for their
    9-speed HG53 chain only advise that detergents used must be neutral;
    Shimano sells a chain lube product, which SRAM does not. Campy
    recommends that chains be cleaned on the bike using a brush or cloth
    saturated with a suitable detergent or degreaser prior to
    relubrication with their chain lube product. I don't know what KMC
    recommends. From what I can see, though, none of the chain makers
    advise removal of the chain for cleaning. There is a school of
    thought which holds that the makers are providing only a minimum and
    not an absolute spec in their recommendations, but as with everything
    else about chain lubrication, opinions vary.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  7. Which is your school of thought?

    --

  8. angotja said:

    Which is your school of thought?

    Our Lady of Perpetual Amazement.

    Bill "at certain posters, that is" S.

  9. Chris H said:

    If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be removing that
    chain unless you put a high strength replacement pin in to replace
    the one you removed.

    Either that, or get a master link from Craig, SRAM, or KMC. The KMC one is like
    $2.50 -- well worth it. You won't have to deal with this issue again.

    Quoted message said:

    Existing pins have a peaned end and removing
    and replacing will weaken the end of the pin and may cause you to
    break the chain. I speak from experience.

    Yup. You could go for months or years with no problems, but then one day...

    Quoted message said:

    By using a thinner or
    petrol solvent bath, you are washing away all the existing internal
    lubricant from the chain rollers and can cause rust to start and
    thusly also weakening the chain..

    You can't wash away the dirt without washing away the lube. But that's why you
    relube.

    Quoted message said:

    Just go to Academy Sports or Nashbar and get a Finish Line chain
    cleaner gizmo ($20). Their bio cleaner works well without completely
    stripping the chain. You don't need to be cleaning it that much!!!

    Chain cleaners work fine, but take a long time to do a good job. You really
    have to keep changing the fluid until it runs clear -- otherwise you're not
    doing any good. This takes many fluid changes, and a lot of time, and it's a
    pain. Also, if you're using bio degreaser, make sure you wash it all off with
    water afterward.

    BTDT.

    Chain cleaners are an OK idea, but they really need a much larger fluid
    reservior. As yet, no one has marketed a really good design.

    Quoted message said:

    Then generously recoat the chain with chain lube, wipe excess off,
    clean and oil the jockey wheels and you're done!! Shouldn't take
    more than 10 minutes.

    It shouldn't take that long, total.

    My method, these days:

    Use parts cleaner can, available in any auto parts store, for under $10. This
    is like a large paint can, filled with solvent, with a parts washer basket
    inside.

    When cleaning the bike, first remove the chain and drop it in the parts cleaner.
    Swish it around in the fluid with a big screwdriver. Proceed to clean the rest
    of the bike. Every so often, give the chain another swish, and lift the basket
    to let the fluid and dirt drain away. Continue cleaning the bike. When you're
    done, remove the chain from the parts cleaner, rinse it out with water, and put
    it back on the bike. Relube when it's dry. Total time spent handling the
    chain -- about 2 minutes. The dirt, oil, and cleaning fluid remains in the can,
    which can be reused for years, without polluting anything.

    Again, the best method is probably an ultrasonic parts cleaner. I've seen
    suitable ones selling on eBay for under $100 -- well worth it for a lifetime
    cyclist. It would pay for itself in 2-3 years.

    Matt O.

  10. Werehatrack said:

    On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:47:30 GMT, angotja

    may have said:

    I generally just wipe it clean and re-lube. If it is heavily soiled,
    I will use a solvent and some q-tips to clean it up as best I can,
    then re-lube & ride. I lube on a weekly/75 mi schedule, and clean as
    needed.

    I am interested to learn the techniques of others...

    As noted in another thread just a few topics above this one (and in
    countless others over the years), chain lube rituals are as varied as
    the people performing them. Results seem to be just as varied. The
    recommendation from SRAM for their chains is a wipe/relube regimen
    using no solvents or degreasers. Shimano's recommendations for their
    9-speed HG53 chain only advise that detergents used must be neutral;
    Shimano sells a chain lube product, which SRAM does not. Campy
    recommends that chains be cleaned on the bike using a brush or cloth
    saturated with a suitable detergent or degreaser prior to
    relubrication with their chain lube product. I don't know what KMC
    recommends. From what I can see, though, none of the chain makers
    advise removal of the chain for cleaning. There is a school of
    thought which holds that the makers are providing only a minimum and
    not an absolute spec in their recommendations, but as with everything
    else about chain lubrication, opinions vary.

    Forget all this "schools of thought" [censored]. This is basic mechanics and
    mechanical practice. There is no mystical knowledge to be had from chain
    manufacturers, who, remember, are in the business of selling chains (at an
    overpriced rate, too).

    Matt O.

  11. Matt O'Toole said:

    Again, the best method [of cleaning a chain] is probably an ultrasonic parts
    cleaner.

    I can't argue with that.

    Quoted message said:

    I've seen
    suitable ones selling on eBay for under $100 -- well worth it for a lifetime
    cyclist. It would pay for itself in 2-3 years.

    How do you figure? What costs will be saved by using a chain cleaner?

    I like to spend $$$ on tools as much as the next tech-nerd. And I think
    an ultrasonic cleaner would be handy on many occaions. But I can't see
    the justification for an ultrasonic cleaner.

    --
    Dave
    dvt at psu dot edu

  12. dvt said:

    Matt O'Toole wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Again, the best method [of cleaning a chain] is probably an
    ultrasonic parts
    cleaner.

    I can't argue with that.

    Quoted message said:

    I've seen
    suitable ones selling on eBay for under $100 -- well worth it for a
    lifetime cyclist. It would pay for itself in 2-3 years.

    How do you figure? What costs will be saved by using a chain cleaner?

    I like to spend $$$ on tools as much as the next tech-nerd. And I
    think an ultrasonic cleaner would be handy on many occaions. But I
    can't see the justification for an ultrasonic cleaner.

    Well, if you go through 3-4 $20 chains a year like I do -- you can cut this
    chain consumption by 2/3, in addition to the convenience and time savings. You
    can also use it for other stuff, and share with your bike-riding neighbors.

    Matt O.

  13. I'd like a ultrasonic cleaner but my 15,000 mile (~3 years) per 240-link
    chain hardly justifies it then.

    "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    | dvt wrote:
    |
    | >|
    | Well, if you go through 3-4 $20 chains a year like I do -- you can cut
    this
    | chain consumption by 2/3, in addition to the convenience and time savings.
    You
    | can also use it for other stuff, and share with your bike-riding
    neighbors.
    |
    | Matt O.
    |
    |

  14. Doug Huffman said:

    I'd like a ultrasonic cleaner but my 15,000 mile (~3 years) per
    240-link chain hardly justifies it then.

    If you're getting that kind of mileage, you're definately doing something right!

    Matt O.

  15. In article <[email hidden]>, angotja

    Quoted message said:

    Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance out of your chain..

    I posted the results of cleaning two halves ot the same chain with the two main
    methods (completely cleaning out by trashing the chain in solvent for one and a
    careful wiping of the outside of the chain with a rag with WC-40 and then with
    a dry tooth brush for the other) and then by lubricating both in exactly the
    same way. I measured the chain halves after cleaning and kept doing it until
    one of them hit 1/16 elongation. The chain half that was solvent thrashed
    reached 1/16 before the other half. I still have my original post if you wish
    to see it.

    My best guess for why is that there is lubrication that remains deep within the
    chain when one doesn't "solvent thrash" the chain.

    I quit "solvent thrashing" my chains.

    Want to buy some used paint thinner?

    Tom Gibb <[email hidden]>

  16. On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 06:30:37 GMT, angotja

    may have said:

    Which is your school of thought?

    Why waste time contemplating the inscrutable when you've got clear,
    unambiguous information from the people who made the item? If it's
    not broke, don't fix it; if the manufacturer's instructions didn't
    work for me, I'd have to figure out something else. That's not the
    case, so I don't.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  17. On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:02:41 -0400, "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]>

    may have said:

    Forget all this "schools of thought" [censored]. This is basic mechanics and
    mechanical practice. There is no mystical knowledge to be had from chain
    manufacturers, who, remember, are in the business of selling chains (at an
    overpriced rate, too).

    And the people who sell expensive chain lubes and cleaning widgets
    have no interest in increasing the amount of effort and expense
    invested in a task that ordinarily is quick and cheap if the
    instructions of the item's manufacturer are followed?

    Everyone in the supply side can be accused of distortion in
    furtherance of a vested interest, but chasing that chimera merely for
    the sake of paranoia is a fool's errand in my opinion.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  18. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be removing that chain
    unless you put a high strength replacement pin in to replace the one you
    removed. Existing pins have a peaned end and removing and replacing will
    weaken the end of the pin and may cause you to break the chain. I speak
    from experience.

    Many chains now come with a quick disconnect link that makes it very easy
    to take your chain off to clean it.

    Quoted message said:

    By using a thinner or petrol solvent bath, you are washing
    away all the existing internal lubricant from the chain rollers and can
    cause rust to start and thusly also weakening the chain..

    I've never had this problem. I rotate through two chains and at times
    one chain will sit solvent for a month with no ill effects. No rust ever.

    Quoted message said:

    Just go to Academy Sports or Nashbar and get a Finish Line chain cleaner
    gizmo ($20). Their bio cleaner works well without completely stripping the
    chain. You don't need to be cleaning it that much!!! Then generously
    recoat the chain with chain lube, wipe excess off, clean and oil the jockey
    wheels and you're done!! Shouldn't take more than 10 minutes.

    These devices do an ok job at cleaning the outside of the chain. You
    want to clean the inside of the chain. That is where all the wear occurs.
    The outside of the chain is really unimporant. It only matters if you want
    to keep your clothes/leg clean.
    ----------------
    Alex

  19. [email hidden] (TBGibb) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
    --

    Quoted message said:

    My best guess for why is that there is lubrication that remains deep within the


    chain when one doesn't "solvent thrash" the chain.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Tom Gibb <[email hidden]>

    Right-O, solvent stay inna chain and further lube is trashed.

    But what the heck, some folks boil their gunky guitar strings too...

    ST

  20. On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:24:47 -0400, Alex Rodriguez <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be removing that chain
    unless you put a high strength replacement pin in to replace the one you
    removed. Existing pins have a peaned end and removing and replacing will
    weaken the end of the pin and may cause you to break the chain. I speak
    from experience.


    As someone who unwittingly removed a fairly new Campag C9 chain from
    his road bike to clean it and then simply replaced it using the
    existing pin I was concerned to read this warning. I took my bike to
    my LBS quite prepared to replace the chain but, after subjecting the
    drive train to some stress, his view was that the chain was safe to
    use and no replacement was necessary.
    I'd be interested in any comments on that opinion.What is the risk of
    this chain breaking under normal riding conditions? While I'm not
    keen to test my teeth against my handlebars or the road, where I live,
    chains, and Campag in particular, are relatively expensive items to
    buy

    Thanks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.