Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Chainring and freewheel compatibility

Started by Vintage Trek · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,575 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
22 February 2010
Last activity
23 February 2010
Original author
Vintage Trek
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,575
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have an old Trek 560 that I am rebuilding bit by bit. I am thinking of replacing the original triple Biopace chainrings, which are still in great shape, with a new triple Shimano Ultegra set (52/42/30). These Ultegra chainrings say that they are meant for 9 speeds, but I have a new 7 speed Shimano freewheel (which replaced the original Helocomatic freewheel). Will these chainrings work with a 7 speed freewheel even though they are intended to be used with 9 speeds?

  2. Vintage Trek said:

    I have an old Trek 560 that I am rebuilding bit by bit. I am thinking of replacing the original triple Biopace chainrings, which are still in great shape, with a new triple Shimano Ultegra set (52/42/30). These Ultegra chainrings say that they are meant for 9 speeds, but I have a new 7 speed Shimano freewheel (which replaced the original Helocomatic freewheel). Will these chainrings work with a 7 speed freewheel even though they are intended to be used with 9 speeds?

    Yes, you can use the 9-speed Ultegra crank with your 7-speed 'stuff' ...

    BTW. If you are getting your crank through a bike shop OR mail order then you MAY want to order a crank with 52/39/30 chainrings.

    FYI. You could just replace the Biopace chainrings with ROUND chainrings ... I would just change the outer & middle rings and leave the granny as a Biopace AND only change the granny if you find that the shifting is dodgy (the smaller, 39t middle ring should expedite shifting between the middle & Biopace granny) ... you will just have to lower the front derailleur to a new height which is appropriate for the outer chainring.

  3. Thanks for your help. I'll see what I can find out there.

  4. Vintage Trek said:

    I have an old Trek 560 that I am rebuilding bit by bit. I am thinking of replacing the original triple Biopace chainrings, which are still in great shape, with a new triple Shimano Ultegra set (52/42/30). These Ultegra chainrings say that they are meant for 9 speeds, but I have a new 7 speed Shimano freewheel (which replaced the original Helocomatic freewheel). Will these chainrings work with a 7 speed freewheel even though they are intended to be used with 9 speeds?

    Yep, just install and ride. As for a 52/39/30..those came out with the advent of 10s, but that will work also. However, if ya do get the 52/39/30 option, you will need the deep cage FD(specific for a 52/39/30, like 6603) or getting the chain off the 39 will be 'iffy'.
    However, I think a 42 middle, on a well set up triple, if best since on a well set up triple, you get full range of the rear cassette in the middle, I think the 39 is a wee bit to small. IMO, of course as gearing is personal.

  5. Vintage Trek said:

    Thanks for your help. I'll see what I can find out there.

    Remember that eBay can be a source for new-or-used chainrings ...

    AND, if-and-when you do decide that you want a new crankset & BB, then you can probably find what you want on eBay.

  6. Peter@vecchios said:

    Yep, just install and ride. As for a 52/39/30..those came out with the advent of 10s, but that will work also. However, if ya do get the 52/39/30 option, you will need the deep cage FD(specific for a 52/39/30, like 6603) or getting the chain off the 39 will be 'iffy'.
    However, I think a 42 middle, on a well set up triple, if best since on a well set up triple, you get full range of the rear cassette in the middle, I think the 39 is a wee bit to small. IMO, of course as gearing is personal.

    FWIW. The reason I suggested a 39t, in addition to making shifting onto a Biopace granny easier (in theory), is because it is probably slightly easier to find a set of 52/39 or 53/39 chainrings than a set of 52/42 ...

    AND, I would rather treat a granny as a bail-out granny rather than worry about the middle chainring optimizing the usable intermediate gearing ... but, I'm not touring.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.