General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Chicken in a Biscuit

Started by STRATEGY · · Last activity · 22 posts · 453 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 March 2006
Last activity
30 March 2006
Original author
STRATEGY
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
453
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    Is it really as delicious with Eazy Cheese as the back of the box
    implies?

    Thanks,

    STRATEGY

  2. On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Peace,
    Carol

  3. One time on Usenet said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    --
    jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

  4. On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -

    rfc) said:
    One time on Usenet said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?

    Peace,
    Carol, ascared

  5. One time on Usenet said:

    On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -

    rfc) said:
    One time on Usenet said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?

    Peace,
    Carol, ascared

    Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
    much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)

    --
    jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

  6. On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:50:57 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -

    rfc) said:
    One time on Usenet said:

    On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -

    rfc) said:

    One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
    > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >
    > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?

    Carol, ascared

    Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
    much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)

    Damn! Those FPs are everywhere. People should be free to eat mutated
    crackers if they so desire. Where's culinary anarchy when you need
    it?

    Peace,
    Carol

  7. jj - rfc said:
    One time on Usenet said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

    Dean G.

  8. Dean G. said:


    jj - rfc said:
    One time on Usenet said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

    That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
    would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
    injuries.

    Peace,
    Carol, concerned

  9. Dean G. said:

    Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.

    Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
    it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
    postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.

    Peace,
    Carol

  10. "Damsel in dis Dress" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Peace,
    Carol

    I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)

    kili

  11. Damsel in dis Dress said:
    Dean G. said:

    Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.

    Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
    it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
    postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.

    Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
    way.

    Dean G.

  12. Damsel in dis Dress said:
    Dean G. said:


    jj - rfc said:

    One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
    > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >
    > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

    That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
    would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
    injuries.

    Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.

    Dean G.

  13. Dean G. said:
    Damsel in dis Dress said:
    Dean G. said:

    Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.

    Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
    it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
    postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.

    Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
    way.

    Very peculiar. The first time it happened, I was trying to respond to
    the initial post. Thought I was losing my mind. Tried it again and
    it was fine. Went back and read the original again, and this was how
    it was displaying.

    Your post is apparently haunted.

    Peace,
    Carol

  14. Dean G. said:
    Damsel in dis Dress said:
    Dean G. said:

    jj - rfc wrote:
    > One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
    > > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > >
    > > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    >
    > Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

    That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
    would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
    injuries.

    Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.

    Well, that's half the battle right there. Do the hammerers each get
    their own cubicle?

    Peace,
    Carol

  15. kilikini said:

    "Damsel in dis Dress" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)

    That would be much more expensive than the transporters that are
    currently being used. <G>

    Peace,
    Carol

  16. Damsel in dis Dress said:


    On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -

    rfc) said:
    One time on Usenet said:

    On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?


    I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    Quoted message said:

    Peace,
    Carol, ascared

  17. biig said:
    Damsel in dis Dress said:


    On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -

    rfc) said:

    One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
    > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >
    > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?


    I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

    Peace,
    Carol

  18. One time on Usenet said:
    biig said:
    Damsel in dis Dress said:


    On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
    rfc) wrote:

    >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >>
    >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    >
    >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?


    I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

    Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...

    --
    jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

  19. On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:48:10 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -

    rfc) said:
    One time on Usenet said:
    biig said:

    Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
    > rfc) wrote:
    >
    > >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:

    > >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    > >> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > >>
    > >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    > >
    > >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
    >
    > Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    >
    I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

    Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...

    No. That's what makes it so insidious. These people are evil. You
    must remain on guard at all times.

    Peace,
    Carol

  20. jj - rfc said:


    One time on Usenet said:
    biig said:

    Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
    > rfc) wrote:
    >
    > >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:

    > >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
    > >> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > >>
    > >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    > >
    > >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
    >
    > Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    >
    I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

    Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...

    Yes, there were freathers in my chicken foot....<G>.....Sharon

    Quoted message said:


    --
    jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.