Hod did they get the chicken in there?
Is it really as delicious with Eazy Cheese as the back of the box
implies?
Thanks,
STRATEGY
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Hod did they get the chicken in there?
Is it really as delicious with Eazy Cheese as the back of the box
implies?
Thanks,
STRATEGY
On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Peace,
Carol
One time on Usenet said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
--
jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
rfc) said:One time on Usenet said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
Peace,
Carol, ascared
One time on Usenet said:On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
rfc) said:One time on Usenet said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
wrote:>Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
Peace,
Carol, ascared
Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)
--
jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:50:57 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
rfc) said:One time on Usenet said:On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
rfc) said:One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>
> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
Carol, ascared
Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)
Damn! Those FPs are everywhere. People should be free to eat mutated
crackers if they so desire. Where's culinary anarchy when you need
it?
Peace,
Carol
jj - rfc said:One time on Usenet said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.
Dean G.
Dean G. said:
jj - rfc said:One time on Usenet said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
wrote:>Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.
That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
injuries.
Peace,
Carol, concerned
Dean G. said:Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.
Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.
Peace,
Carol
"Damsel in dis Dress" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Peace,
Carol
I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)
kili
Damsel in dis Dress said:Dean G. said:Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.
Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.
Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
way.
Dean G.
Damsel in dis Dress said:Dean G. said:
jj - rfc said:One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>
> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.
That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
injuries.
Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.
Dean G.
Dean G. said:Damsel in dis Dress said:Dean G. said:Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.
Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
way.
Very peculiar. The first time it happened, I was trying to respond to
the initial post. Thought I was losing my mind. Tried it again and
it was fine. Went back and read the original again, and this was how
it was displaying.
Your post is apparently haunted.
Peace,
Carol
Dean G. said:Damsel in dis Dress said:Dean G. said:jj - rfc wrote:
> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >
> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>
> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.
That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
injuries.Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.
Well, that's half the battle right there. Do the hammerers each get
their own cubicle?
Peace,
Carol
kilikini said:"Damsel in dis Dress" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)
That would be much more expensive than the transporters that are
currently being used. <G>
Peace,
Carol
Damsel in dis Dress said:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -rfc) said:One time on Usenet said:On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
wrote:>Hod did they get the chicken in there?
They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....
Quoted message said:Peace,
Carol, ascared
biig said:Damsel in dis Dress said:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -rfc) said:One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]> said:
> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>
> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....
See? That's what I'm talkin' about!
Peace,
Carol
One time on Usenet said:biig said:Damsel in dis Dress said:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
rfc) wrote:>One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>>
>> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>
>Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
>Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....See? That's what I'm talkin' about!
Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...
--
jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:48:10 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
rfc) said:One time on Usenet said:biig said:Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
> rfc) wrote:
>
> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >>
> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
> >
> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>
> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
>
I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....See? That's what I'm talkin' about!
Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...
No. That's what makes it so insidious. These people are evil. You
must remain on guard at all times.
Peace,
Carol
jj - rfc said:
One time on Usenet said:biig said:Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email hidden] (jj -
> rfc) wrote:
>
> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email hidden]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >>
> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
> >
> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>
> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
>
I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....See? That's what I'm talkin' about!
Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...
Yes, there were freathers in my chicken foot....<G>.....Sharon
Quoted message said:
--
jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.