General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Chocolate sources

Started by Michael · · Last activity · 12 posts · 1,031 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 January 2005
Last activity
29 January 2005
Original author
Michael
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,031
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm thinking about making some chocolate candy with
    something a touch more expensive than the buck fifty
    per pound Nestle's semisweet chips I've been using.
    I've done the google for chocolate with iffy results.
    Could anybody recommend some good places to buy
    chocolate for candymaking online?

    Thank you, Michael

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael said:

    I'm thinking about making some chocolate candy with
    something a touch more expensive than the buck fifty
    per pound Nestle's semisweet chips I've been using.
    I've done the google for chocolate with iffy results.
    Could anybody recommend some good places to buy
    chocolate for candymaking online?

    For *camdymaking*? You know that you don't use chocolate chips in
    candymaking, right?

    Chocosphere has a fantastic selection of high-end chocolate--more for
    eating than for cooking.

    <http://www.chocosphere.com>

    If that's *too* high end, just pick up some Ghirardelli. Far better than
    Nestle, and any decent supermarket should carry it.

    --
    to respond (OT only), change "spamless.invalid" to "optonline.net"

    <http://www.thecoffeefaq.com/>

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Scott said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael said:

    I'm thinking about making some chocolate candy with
    something a touch more expensive than the buck fifty
    per pound Nestle's semisweet chips I've been using.
    I've done the google for chocolate with iffy results.
    Could anybody recommend some good places to buy
    chocolate for candymaking online?

    For *camdymaking*? You know that you don't use chocolate chips in
    candymaking, right?

    Chocosphere has a fantastic selection of high-end chocolate--more for
    eating than for cooking.

    <http://www.chocosphere.com>

    If that's *too* high end, just pick up some Ghirardelli. Far better than
    Nestle, and any decent supermarket should carry it.

    Dove is better........ ;-d
    --
    K.

    Sprout the MungBean to reply

    "I don't like to commit myself about heaven and hell‹you
    see, I have friends in both places." --Mark Twain

  4. Scott wrote:

    For *camdymaking*? You know that you don't use chocolate chips in
    candymaking, right?

    ************
    Huh? I've made lots of candy with Nestle's semisweet chocolate
    chips!

    Thanks for the links.

    Michael

  5. "Michael" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm thinking about making some chocolate candy with
    something a touch more expensive than the buck fifty
    per pound Nestle's semisweet chips I've been using.
    I've done the google for chocolate with iffy results.
    Could anybody recommend some good places to buy
    chocolate for candymaking online?

    I've been verry happy with Trader Joe's semi-sweet chocolate chips,
    actually.

  6. "Michael" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm thinking about making some chocolate candy with
    something a touch more expensive than the buck fifty
    per pound Nestle's semisweet chips I've been using.
    I've done the google for chocolate with iffy results.
    Could anybody recommend some good places to buy
    chocolate for candymaking online?

    Thank you, Michael

    Unless you really want to buy online, I would assume your supermarket would
    have some nicer brands, certainly Ghiradelli, and maybe Scharffen Berger.
    These may be bars and not chips, though.

    -T

  7. at Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:12:06 GMT in
    <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] (Katra) wrote :

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Scott said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael said:

    I'm thinking about making some chocolate candy with
    something a touch more expensive than the buck fifty
    per pound Nestle's semisweet chips...

    Chocosphere has a fantastic selection of high-end chocolate--more for
    eating than for cooking.

    There's no need to make a distinction between "eating" and "cooking"
    chocolate. If a chocolate isn't good for eating, it isn't good for cooking.

    About the only thing that can sometimes make "eating" chocolate difficult
    for cooking is format. Buying multiple small bars is a bit awkward,
    although certainly better than the alternative of buying Baker's Chocolate.

    But it doesn't matter, anyway, because Chocosphere carries good chocolate
    in all formats - from small 8g sample squares up to 10 lb blocs. There's
    hardly a loser among the chocolates they carry.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If that's *too* high end, just pick up some Ghirardelli. Far better
    than Nestle, and any decent supermarket should carry it.

    Dove is better........ ;-d

    Not IMHO, not by a long shot. Dove may have better *texture* than
    Ghirardelli, but then again, if you want the ultimate in texture you should
    go to Chocosphere anyway and get the Hachez Cocoa D'Arriba. But
    Ghirardelli's flavour is a good deal better and stronger than Dove,
    especially for their bittersweet bars.

    OTOH, again, on Chocosphere, you can do better still in flavour, with
    companies like Michel Cluizel, Domori, Guittard, and Amedei.
    Notwithstanding, Ghirardelli is still excellent and very widely available.

    --
    Alex Rast
    [email hidden]
    (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply)

  8. I have some experience with Ghiradelli. A friend gave me a big bar
    that is sold on very limited occasions at Sam's Club. It was good,
    but in my opinion it was no better than the Nestle's chips I use. I
    also note that Sam's Club sells Ghiradelli chips that are cheaper
    than the Nestle's. This leads me to think that Ghiradelli sells
    "cheap"
    chocolate as well as the higher quality that they are noted for.

  9. Quoted message said:
    Michael' robison_m said:

    I'm thinking about making some chocolate candy with
    something a touch more expensive than the buck fifty
    per pound Nestle's semisweet chips I've been using.
    I've done the google for chocolate with iffy results.
    Could anybody recommend some good places to buy
    chocolate for candymaking online?

    www.bakerscatalogue.com

    ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
    ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
    *********
    "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
    Sheldon
    ````````````

  10. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Alex Rast) said:

    There's no need to make a distinction between "eating" and "cooking"
    chocolate. If a chocolate isn't good for eating, it isn't good for cooking.

    But would it be a waste of money to use top of the line chocolate for
    cooking in recipes that call for many other ingredients? That is, while
    I certainly wouldn't use Baker's (brand) chocolate to make fudge,
    wouldn't it be overkill to use Amedei Porcelana?

    --
    to respond (OT only), change "spamless.invalid" to "optonline.net"

    <http://www.thecoffeefaq.com/>

  11. at Sun, 23 Jan 2005 03:45:16 GMT in
    <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] (Scott) wrote :

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Alex Rast) said:

    There's no need to make a distinction between "eating" and "cooking"
    chocolate. If a chocolate isn't good for eating, it isn't good for
    cooking.

    But would it be a waste of money to use top of the line chocolate for
    cooking in recipes that call for many other ingredients? That is, while
    I certainly wouldn't use Baker's (brand) chocolate to make fudge,
    wouldn't it be overkill to use Amedei Porcelana?

    It's certainly not a waste of money to use top-of-the-line chocolate for
    recipes that call for other ingredients - you really *can* tell the
    difference. In many cases, the difference is stunning. Part of the issue is
    that some people don't realise that the difference between good chocolate
    and bad chocolate really is very large - it's not a subtle distinction.

    For example, I used Amedei Chuao to make brownies, and the results were,
    pretty much as I expected, out-of-this-world. Some people might think
    brownies too lowbrow for Amedei Chuao, but I think precisely the reverse,
    that the taste of Chuao harmonises perfectly with the tastes you want in a
    brownie and is hence an ideal choice.

    Meanwhile, it might be a waste to use Amedei Porcelana in fudge, but not
    because it would be a waste to use good chocolate, but rather because
    Porcelana, which has a mild, delicate flavour, might not be the best
    chocolate in this application, which demands a bolder and more assertive
    chocolate. I'd probably want to use something like Domori Puertomar. BTW,
    Domori's Porcelana is also considerably better than Amedei's version. I
    used it to make an icing for a chocolate cake - where it was the perfect
    choice.

    That's not to say you can't get good results with quality chocolate that
    isn't necessarily at the top of the snob-appeal scale - e.g. Ghirardelli,
    Callebaut, etc., but it's virtually impossible to get good results with
    chocolate that's genuinely *bad*, e.g. Baker's, Hershey's milk chocolate,
    etc.

    --
    Alex Rast
    [email hidden]
    (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply)

  12. I went to the chocosphere site and I'm interested in buying
    some chocolate there and I'd like to know if the Guittard High
    Sierra White would be good for a colored coating for truffles.
    And what about the Guittard's Classic "Oban" Cocoa Liquor
    (Unsweetened Chocolate) Wafers? Is that good chocolate?
    I can buy both these chocolates in bulk for around $5 a pound,
    which I think is a fairly reasonable price if it's good chocolate.
    Thank you, Michael

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.